SpaceX revealed Next-Gen Starship is bigger and better that thrills Scientists' mind

preview_player
Показать описание
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa
==
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
=====
SpaceX revealed Next-Gen Starship is bigger and better that thrills Scientists' mind
Starship 2.0!
1)HUGE THANKS TO:
2) 🎵 ABOUT ALL TRACK IN MY VIDEO 🎵
Song: Epic Cinematic Music
support his PATREON PAGE:
Vexento & Dexento - Anesthesia
Emotional Epic Orchestra by MokkaMusic / Hope

3) SOURCES OF THUMBNAILS :

4) SOURCES OF IMAGES AND VIDEOS:
====
SpaceX’s Starship is considered the most powerful rocket ever built so far.
But have you ever thought, after Starship, will SpaceX produce any more powerful rockets?
In fact, Musk has long been hinting at a new rocket, Starship 2.0!!!
As Starship’s successor, how powerful will this rocket be?
And what superiority does it have compared to the current Starship version?
Let's find out more in today's episode of Great SpaceX!

Falcon. Dragon. Starlink. Starman.
SpaceX has contributed a lot to our spaceflight vernacular, showing just how far the company has come in its first 20 years.
Elon Musk founded SpaceX on March 14, 2002, with big dreams of creating reusable rockets, commercial spacecraft and other advanced technology. Musk has said that few believed it was possible, during an era when space agencies still dominated the industry and space hardware was mostly expendable, save for a few examples like NASA's space shuttle and its solid rocket boosters.
SpaceX revealed Next-Gen Starship is bigger and better that thrills Scientists' mind
----
To be resolved, thank you.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Those are not shots of the Saturn V. They are from the one-person mercury program in the early 1960s. The Saturn V is MUCH bigger!

ChrisBrengel
Автор

Your photo of the Saturn V was a Titan Rocket..

Someone got their rockets mixed up

gorlok
Автор

6:18 That's a Gemini spacecraft on top of a Titan II booster. NOT a Saturn V.

TimStCroix
Автор

“Starship is like wow.” That’s the whole quote. Wow.

dcle
Автор

Makes more sense to develop a nuclear powered Starship to decrease transit time.

maninifarmer
Автор

6:18 & 6:36 That's not a Saturn 5.

lnchgj
Автор

Why does your voice over keep saying "Saturn V" but your image is of a Titan II launching?

lawrenceallen
Автор

2.0 needs to be built in space already in orbit. They need to use the upcoming starships to build a giant orbiting starship factory, where the bigger 2.0 ships would be built. In space, at least 300 miles up, A spaceship, this size would be much safer for the earth's atmosphere. The Starship 2.0 would never land on earth. The smaller starships would ferry passengers from earth to a space station, where the Starship 2.0 would be docked, waiting for a trip to the moon, Mars, or whatever. On the return, the Starship 2.0 would dock to this space station. Passengers would land on earth in the smaller starships. This is, of course, at least 100 years away. They need to launch the smaller starship first.

kevinswales
Автор

Guys I'm very impressed with my South African counterpart sending rockets to space but should we not get the little starship up and down safely before expanding on an idea that hasn't flown yet actually on second thought just build them and test them.

banditcatcher.
Автор

Starship 2.0 built in orbit would never have to land on/launch from earth. 🤔

Muuip
Автор

In 60 AD Apostle Saint Andrew traveled to the area of Kiev, preached, and said, one day a great city would be built here with many churches to the glory of God. Today there is a church to Saint Andrew in Kiev. The peoples in the area were Slavic. Kyi, Shchek and Khoryv, three brothers and the sister Lybid founded Kiev in 482 AD, Kiev was named after the older brother Kyi. Kiev the older brother was King. Herodotus wrote that Hercules had founded this land.

The Rus were Viking tribes that settled peacefully in Kiev as far back as 750 AD with the Slavs there, 400 years before Moskva existed. The name Russia, coming from the city Moskva, has no connection to the RUS. Russia coming from Moskva started with Batu Kahn much later as a vasal under Mongolian rule. All the early Czars were Mongolian and of no connection to the RUS. The Rus were with the Slavs to the south in Kiev. Moskva were Finnish Urgic Tribes; Mosk means cow and Va water, which are Finnish names. There was no RUS there. The ethnic background of Moskva is Finnish-Urgic and Mongolian. The Rus developed the religion, city Kiev, alphabet, churches, and had its saints. The founder of Kievian Rus (800) or the Rus was a Viking named Askold or Oskold (Norse) from Sweden; not Oleg as in the Russian story. Kievian Rus exists long Before Novgorod and Oleg’s arrival there. Askold is the Slavic name. Oskold, the first King of Kievian Rus was in Kiev before Oleg in Novgorod. Oskold had 200 ships and 20, 000 warriors. Oskold was baptized in Constantinople (128 years before Volodymyr) and sent the first bishop back to Kiev. Oskold and Dir were the first Dynasty of Kievian Rus. Askold rules from the 40-60s and Dir to the 80s. Askold is buried in Kiev and the first Kievian Christian King & Dynasty. Oleg followed coming from Sweden through Novgorod and was a pagan. Russia as named today started in the city of Moskva over 400 years later after Kievian Rus or Rus. From Kiev, the capitol of Rus, Kievian culture was spread, much like the Greeks Hellenized the known world, or like the British anglicized the world by the English language. This process does not make Moskva to become RUS in as much as Persian are not Greek. How we are misled by a name; Russia. The capitol of the RUS has always been Kiev. There is no other RUS and no RUS in Moskva. Many say Ukraine began recently; but the culture of the RUS is Kievian RUS, both culture and ethnic background. Ukraine is a name given by Poland meaning outer lands. The land of the RUS before the Mongolian invasion was very large. The name RUS is a Norse name which means men that row; there are no men that row in Moskva. So Moskva adopted the name Russia while being a Mongolian vassal, essentially traitor to the RUS; and all the Czars were Mongolian-Finnish. The Culture of the Mongolian was centralized power, and that cultural imprint was passed on to present day Russia. Ukraine’s real name should be Kievian RUS, or Kievskarus! Russia began in Moskva by Batu Kahn and Novgorod conquered much later, still no connection to the Rus.

Putin & Lavrov should be ashamed of themselves, the USSR was an occupation; it never had the status of a sovereign state and due process of law that would be associated with a free society. Even today the mentality of the gulag exists. There is no freedom of press and speech, people are arrested for speech, there is no due process of law, and the religion is state run making it a totalitarian theocracy. As such, it did not deserve to exist in a free world; and history has shown such totalitarian organizations fail over time and author in many gulags. The true culture of Russia is Finno-Ugric and Mongolian, having nothing to do with the RUS (Kievian), expect borrowed as in the sense of Hellenized or Anglicized "forms" as a comparative reference. The centralized form of Russian politics is a very Mongolian imprint on culture. The actions of Putin seem to be another Mongolian invasion of Kiev; here I suggest as to the correct metaphor. I believe so. Putin & Lavrov insistence to have purview over eastern Europe also seems like paying tribute to the Mongolian Horde. Moskva started as an agglomeration of Finnish tribes, combining a Finnish name meaning cows water and developed by Mongolian culture. Mosk means cow and Va means water. The RUS are men that row, Vikings, Norse, established Kiev 400 years before (750 AD) Moskva even thought to exist. The name Russia for current nation is totally inappropriate. The current Russia started in Moskva; how misleading is the name Russia coming from Moskva that has no connection to the RUS. All the lands should be returned to Kiev; the West of Russia to Finland, and the East to Mongolia. Russia’s place on the globe appears as a temporary aberration in my view. To use threats of Nukes publicly strikes at the heart as adolescent behaviour; surely any nation or person that issues such threats and being an ally to such while not even having war imposed on them is not fit to rule. This would include allies of Russia. Oh yes, I remember, Russia didn't invent the bomb, they stole it in the 1940's and gave it to Kurchatov. Russia struggles with an identity crisis since its beginnings unoriginal to the ethnic groups. Its errors are numerous, 50 million killed by Stalin in WW2, allied to the Nazis to kill the Poles for their defeat in WW2, Holodomor where millions of Ukrainians were killed and grain stolen, and constant antagonist with Europe. We even have the Holy Mother announcing Russia’s errors at Fatima. Russia is a Mongolian culture and all the first Czars were Mongolian and Batu Kahn is the author.

Oskold was the grandson of Ragnar the king of Sweden, his name is old Norse and spoke old Norse, the name Rus is old Norse, he settled peacefully in Kiev and the Slavs made him king, he brought Christianity to Kiev with his son dir...his burial mound is where St Nicholas church is built, Oleg wasn’t even in Novgorod when this happened, and Oleg is not a Rus nor old Norse name. The Slavs called Oskold the name Askold. After came Dir, Oleg was a pagan who assassinated Dir, Oskold becomes the first dynasty...later when the line of kings get to Vladimir, he is captured at a trading post by the Mongols, the post is called Moskva, and the king killed. Moskva as a city was a Mongolian invention, and Novgorod becomes a part of that Russia by conquest, although having nothing to do with the Rus. Oskold line is Ragnar, ironside, Oskold from the King of Sweden Ragnar. Oleg is via Rurik coming much later. The accounts of Oskold are within the time, Al Mamun an Arab writer of the time wrote of Oskold, the Russian chronicles come hundreds of years later. In much the same way accounts of relevant history are better understood by those of the times, much like the Bible, dating to the original times makes the account authentic. The Russian chronicles are merely a tale and inaccurate.

Kiev was a city over 1000 years before Russia even existed. Kiev was Kievian Rus before Novgorod and when Oleg arrived. Putin is kidding himself if he thinks any part of Ukraine belongs to Russia. We can see that Israel belongs to the Jews, similarly all the lands around Kiev of Kievian Rus belong to Kiev as a single nation and city state. Russia's beginnings are a wanting child begun as a captive insurgency having nothing of its own; a captive state that was reeking in servitude to Mongolia and invented by Mongolia. The entire culture of Russia from Moscow is Mongolian centralized power, a pagan culture of no empathy and Christianity. The Christianity is tainted as a state religion or theocracy and politicized. History is often obscured by being written by the ones in charge. The history of Ukraine has been obscured by the Soviet Occupation and cultural appropriations. Moscow in an attempt to appropriate a history not its own, rewrote the narrative of history to cover up its compromised origins; Kiev and Ukraine is a history much older and more civilized; making contributions to civilization. Russian despotism becomes the blueprint, foundation & model for every despot nation, look at its allies; the error of its ways has spread throughout the globe; much like the message from the Holy Mother at Fatima. Those that are sympathetic to Russian atrocities can find similarities in their own histories. Ukraine has a democracy at a local level Moscow never had and fears. Russian boundless ignorance is a type often found in the poorest of nations, and usually the poorest have a history of the hardest tyrants over them that also inflict poverty, physical and spiritual, on others they attempt to subjugate, a reflection of their own lives, an abomination of desolation.

Askold was in Constantinople in 860 and Oleg arrived in Novgorod not until 862. The Arabs referred to Askold as the Slavic King or King of the Slavs which he had been for a while. Pontius says Askold brings Christianity to Kiev from Constantinople and a bishop. Ragnar the Norse King of Sweden was born in 767 AD, his son Bjorn ironside was born in 796 AD, and grandson Oskold (Askold) was born in 820 AD. Askold arrived in Kiev in 840 and had a son Dir, Both become King and the first Christian dynasty. Askold dies and gets a burial mound in a park in Kiev. Dir follows as King. Dir is assassinated by Oleg who is a pagan. Nobody knows who Rurik is or who the father is . Oleg is a generation away from Askold. Olga of Kiev builds a church on Askold’ s burial grounds. Pontius of Constantinople says Askold brings a Bishop and Christianity to Kiev. Russia much later is a Mongolian invention...

georgejamesducas
Автор

Material to build the next one has gotta change into something lighter...

gwyn.
Автор

Couple of times you mentioned Saturn V, but the VT clip was very much NOT a Saturn V, instead it was a Titan. Still an impressive machine, but orders of magnitude smaller!!

adrianhjordan
Автор

Crazy! Elon cant stop if he tried! They probably designed the next gen Starship without the motor design to see what is possible for a launch vehicle. Hopefully SpaceX will find/create the next gen super rocket motor tech they need!

zaz
Автор

First they gotta get the "small" Starships working as orbital flight vehicles.

mustang
Автор

Doubling the height is unlikely. The area available for rocket engines goes up linearly with the cross sectional area, i.e. the square of the diameter, not the cube. So to also double the height and cube the volume and presumably mass would require dramatically better engines - better than the physics allows. So doubling the diameter makes sense, the squared available thrust would be reasonably close to the requirement for the squared cargo mass.
Of course making the vehicle taller byt emptier could provide a lot of room for lightweight and long cargo, but that doesn't seem particularly valuable.

GaryBickford
Автор

One thing we need to understand about becoming multi-planetary species is the effect of microgravity & low gravity, and the various forms of radiation (Solar, interstellar, etc.) when humans move off our planet, on human reproduction. A simple internet search of "mammalian reproduction in space" or microgravity, etc. produces shockingly little. 50b years and no one tried to have mice reproduce for a couple generations in space? Great SpaceX might want to dedicate a video about this critically important topic. Engineering bigger and bigger rockets is one thing, but preventing our species from becoming a sickly and deformed bio-mess that dies off after less than 50 years in space or on Mars is a BIG problem!

lawrenceallen
Автор

We're gonna need a montage, an Elon Musk montage, all of his claims and the people he blames are in this montage, this crazy SpaceX montage....

Gallagher
Автор

"Planetary science will just explode." Please don't jinx it

justapleb
Автор

SpaceX is having a hard enough time getting a giant 9m wide rocket off of the ground when fully stacked. At this they are pushing the limits of what regulators will allow to fly. I mean it wasn't too hard in the scheme of things to get the much smaller second stage with 3 Raptor 1 engines off of the ground. But now add in the 33 Raptor 2 engine 1st stage and stack and wow, I mean you definitely don't want to get too close to that when fully fueled and either ready to go or launching. Where ever you go along the beach, well it is hard to get big areas cleared. Even the much smaller Falcon 9 rattles the bones from miles away in a launch when everything goes to plan. Elon likes to talk, but reality is already pushing back on 9m wide and 120m tall.

ChaJ