Partial Orderings (Solved Problems) - Set 1

preview_player
Показать описание
Discrete Mathematics: Partial Orderings (Solved Problems) - Set 1
Topics discussed:
1) Solved problems on Partial Orderings.

Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]

#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #PartialOrdering
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

6:32 It's Asymmetric, not "Antisymmetric", because a is taller than b, and b is taller than a, is impossible. When you say it's Antisymmetric this means that's possible when a = b, but as we saw in Reflexivity it's not.

SylvesterDZH
Автор

problem1 b is transitive bcoz for (2, 2) & in itself is present..same for (2, 3) & (3, 3)

manvigupta
Автор

Problem 2
If a is taller than b
Then it is possible that a>b
So why it is antisymmetric
And why problem 3 is not a antisymmetric

ahmadabadi_jainil
Автор

Sir your videos are incredible..please upload vudeos on data structure

dogsgallery
Автор

Saying "You can check this on your own" instead of actually explaining things is not a good idea. It leaves so many students in doubt. Please explain why 1 and 2 were transitive

divyamthakur
Автор

Why is it trivial that in the first set R1 is transitive?

AKHAN-nobz
Автор

4:32 its transitive bcoz we have (2, 3) (3, 0) and (2, 0)

JahnaviSaxena
Автор

Sir can you upload remaining videos of data structures

cetadda
Автор

sir plzz complete other topics fast sp.Graph Theory

moinuddinshaikh
Автор

i thought R3 going to be transitive because there is {0, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2} so doesn't that makes it transitive?

ananya
Автор

b part was not transitive (2, 0) and (2, 3) were there but no (0, 3)

harshitchopra
Автор

R3 is transitive because if I am not taller than you, and you are not taller than my dad, then I am certainly not taller than my dad. Right ?

rajeshprajapati
Автор

please could you complete the data structures playlist and also make videos on engineering mathematics. Please this is an urgent request. I'm preparing for GATE and really need good videos for the above mentioned subject.

dishabyakod
Автор

i dont agree with the second exercises the second exemple, because when you define an order relation and you compare the elements a, b you must either define the relation on a set of height measurement or people, because the equal height measurement will be considered the same element, ooor i missed something in the class because this concept seems unambigious in the exemple and more complex if you can explain

bachoundaseddik
Автор

thanks a lot sir 🙏🏼 😊 ☺ ❤ 🙂 🙏🏼 😊 ☺ ❤ 🙂 🙏🏼 😊 ☺ ❤ 🙂

monicabattacharya
Автор

Sir it seems like R4 is transitive . There is (1, 2) (2, 3) and (1, 3)

chukwuedobernadette
Автор

I have sent you a message regarding to your YouTube channel. I hope it will add value for your channel. Anyway I am looking forward to kind response.

tufayelahmedraju
Автор

2:41 for (2, 0) and (2, 3) there is no (0, 3) in relation then how is it transitive???

plz explain

kevalshah
Автор

I think you are lacking some knowledge about transitive relation ... you are doing it the wrong way plz checkk 2:41

kulsoomfatima
Автор

Sorry, but the explanation for (a) is not helpful at all. I found for such an important topic that this was rushed without adequate explanation

basilbrush