The Church Split - Leaving the Frying Pan of Extreme IFB to the Fire of Apostasy / Original Sin etc.

"The Church Split" is a podcast led by a former member of the IFB, who in the process of leaving "threw out the baby with the bath water". By refusing to acknowledge the validity of the Reformation, and choosing instead to start from scratch, they have jettisoned the fundamentals of the faith and instead adopted serious heresies. Pastors Jeff Dollar and Chris Jones discuss the various doctrines in which the men of the Church Split have departed from Orthodoxy and adopted heresies previously condemned in Church history.

#thechurchsplit

[TerrorVoid]

Having left the new ifb, and now attending a reformed Bible church. The difference is amazing. The ifb was man centered, while the reformed church is Christ honoring.

[theremnantsvoice]

Would you put Bryan Derlinger in this category?

[lukeyznaga]

There's a hyper fundamental church, a dangerous one that has an expensive college, in Dunn, North Carolina.

[nicobrits]

One of those verses you read for years but not clicking the meaning. Hosea 12:2-3 The Lord hath also a controversy with Judah, and will punish Jacob according to his ways; according to his doings will he recompense him. He took his brother by the heel in the womb, and by his strength he had power with God: I understand this as that God sees Jacob and Esau’s ‘struggling together’ in the womb Gen 25:22 as sin for which they are accountable.

[seamus]

Then: “I don’t believe sin is passed thru the way Augustine said, thru the seed literally.”
Also them: “Joseph cannot possibly be the legitimate father because then Jesus would have inherited sin from his seed.”

…. 🤔🧐

[TheChurchSplit]

This should be fun. Already a bunch of out of context clips devoid of the explanation to follow.

Also, hardly a pendulum swing. Still very theologically conservative.

[casey]

So, you leave a church over the KJV-only-ism, then you have what? Any modern version works for you?
NASB 1977 or 1995 or 2020
or NIV 1978 or 1984 or 2011
or NLT 1996 or 2004 or 2007 or 2013 or 2015
or ESV 2001 or 2007 or 2011 or 2016,
or NKJV 1982 or 1984 or (just wait, there will be another one, they are loosing market share)

And the list goes on.

Churches don't want to be KJV-Only, but then they wake up a few years down the road and realize the translation they picked just went through another revision that is not acceptable. But the church can no longer really have an opinion on translations, especially the one that chose over the KJV. A lot of NASB 1977 Churches saw this happen when the NASB 2020 came out.