Proof That Radiocarbon (C-14) Dating Methods Are False, Flawed, & Unreliable Scientifically

Показать описание

*** Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. *******

If you find it in your heart to help me be able to have more time for research, editing, uploading and resources for books.
You can donate to me as a patreon if you like:

Only do this if you are willing and able, I will continue to do what I do either way.

In this video we will be reading from chapter 15, 16, 17, & 18 of Book 1: The Issue with Chronology" from the Series: History: Fiction or Science? written by Anatoly Fomenko. In this episode of this series we will show undeniable scientific proof that Radiocarbon dating methods are false, flawed, and unreliable. We have been lied to about Carbon - 14 Datings.

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

Bought and paid for scientists can make Carbon Dating say exactly what those who write their paychecks want it to say. All your work Kurimeo has helped me on getting closer to a true understanding of the world at large in my own research. Thank you so much dude for all you've done, are doing, and will do in the future. Much love man!

iCeeYouP

I remember in school when they found a Woolly mammoth. It had to different dates...

Cedricbennettjr

Thank You Ahch. Remember Professor Cheikh Anta Diop Puttem All On Blast Over Their "Flawed" Methodologies in the Archeological and Anthropological Studies.

ramsfire

Thank you for this video. I keep telling people that these authorities are paid liars, and here is more proof.

DaughterOfKia

Bro… the fact that it was put in place the same year as the Balfour declaration is crazy. 1948. Damn. 🤦🏽‍♂️

toppcatt

50:24 Khan… this is wild… I LIVE in Baltimore about 10-15 minutes from the harbor and all that sewage…

Prester_Sean

Thanks Kumerio, I'm thankful for the work you inform us with.❤❤❤❤Moderators 🌹 🌹 🌹 🌹

TS-tkwv

On New Caldedonia / Isle of Pines —

There are cylinders made of high-quality concrete dated to be around 10, 000 to 12, 000 years old – much older than what they have been telling the world when concrete was invented.

This means that pyramid blocks were poured concrete in place. For some reason, they loved to keep the mystery of how they cut and moved the blocks.

The answer is simple —they didn't cut or move the blocks. They built the pyramids one block at a time by bringing the raw materials to the construction site.

giosasso

Dating altered, via changing insignificance of ( I ) or (Y) identifying the j/iear/year. Turning into 1000yr addition. After another reset? Maybe?

danguevara

Worked at the company that allegedly held the copyright. Despicable😮

gloriawilmer

Right on time. I’ve been hearing that they found 700, 000 year old skull found in Greece. I thought they were fishing trying to add people to old history

Randy

Great reading. Appreciate your efforts. Thanks Kurimeo.

JohnMaclane-emel

Thank you so much, I have to pause and re-listen. IM SO Grateful for you exposing this. I have a big problem with Nero abd the Church thing...and the coins, that closed to have the Silphium Plant?

pauladee