CARBON DATING HISTORY IS PSEUDOSCIENCE (DAMNING EVIDENCE DEBUNKS C-14 RELIABILITY)

How can we be certain that the historical accounts are accurate representations of world history? Thankfully scientific progress offers us a foolproof method to precisely date certain archaeological artifacts and place them within a historical timeline: Radiocarbon Dating.

Here, we will explore the numerous challenges when applying radiocarbon dating to artifacts originating relatively recently in our timeline, (within the last two to three thousand years). As we'll illustrate, carbon dating routinely provides dates with a margin of error ranging from one to two thousand years, casting doubt on the accuracy of these dates yielding results that are inaccurate as much as 10 times—making specimens appear far older or even dating them to the distant future.

If you enjoyed this video, please show your support by liking and subscribing to our channel.

More Videos From HISTORY HACKED:


The Truth Can Be Computed

THE ROMAN EMPIRE NEVER EXISTED

FAITH-BASED HISTORY INTV W/ ROBERT LAMONT

WTF Is Tartaria?: Intv w/ JB Slear

Ancient Egypt Exposed As Medieval

[pythontest]

As long as there is no way of going back in time and checking if the "guessed" dating is correct, carbon dating, or any other form of dating other than the social kind, is a theory at best and should be treated as such.

[thegoblin]

5.30 because maybe just maybe the time line is accurate

[ulieggermann]

What you showed us is impressive and really shocking.
But I do not like that kind of presentation. It is way too frantic!
I (not english speaking) had to save my eyes and only read the subtitles, for to understand what you were talking about...

[thegoblin]

3.19 are you just not aware of the reservoir affect?

[TerribleShmeltingAccident]

If carbon’s half-life is 5k how is it used to date anything older?