Does God Exist? AI debates Atheist vs. Believer

I configured Atheist and Believer AIs (large language models) to engage in a debate over the most profound questions: Does the existence of suffering and evil disprove the existence of God? And what about the origins of the universe itself?

Watch as these advanced LLMs bring unique perspectives and arguments to the table, challenging beliefs and shedding light on a topic that has sparked discussions for centuries.

To make it even more interesting, I've included 14 different AI models from some of the largest companies in the world to judge each response. It'll be fascinating to see if there's any bias in their evaluations and how they each interpret the arguments.

Leave your thoughts in the comments.
If you enjoy the video, please consider hitting the like button, and subscribing with notifications for more.

TIMESTAMPS
0:00 Round 1: Does Evil Disprove God?
0:29 Suffering Contradicts a Loving God
1:12 Evil Validates God's Necessity
1:57 Morality Arises from Evolution
2:36 Heaven Justifies Earthly Suffering
3:15 Natural Suffering Lacks Purpose
3:53 Divine Hiddenness Preserves Free Will
4:30 Extreme Suffering Questions Benevolent God
5:11 Free Will Justifies Suffering
5:56 Memetics Explain Moral Intuitions
6:42 Ecosystems Reflect Moral Order
7:23 Nature's Wastefulness Challenges Design
8:11 Suffering Fosters Human Virtue
8:57 Animal Suffering Remains Unexplained
9:43 Human Progress Through Adversity

Intermission
10:56 Animal Suffering Challenges Divine Plan
11:14 Hard Problem of Consciousness

Round 2: Origin of the Universe
11:35 What Started the Universe?
12:29 Quantum Events Defy Causality
13:20 First Cause is Necessary
14:14 Universe Can Sustain Itself
15:12 Group Dependency Principle
16:04 Holographic Universe Theory
17:01 Universe's Beginning Needs Explanation
17:57 Quantum Mechanics Challenges Causality
18:49 Necessary Being Explains Existence
19:47 Multiverse Explains Fine-Tuning
20:56 Comprehensive Explanation Required
21:59 Evidence-Based Understanding of Existence
23:03 Argument for a Creator
24:08 Scientific Inquiry Offers Answers
***

[JonOleksiuk]

NEW debates with NEW AI models


Don't forget to subscribe and hit the bell so you don't miss the next debate :)

[justinanderson]

This is what a debate is supposed to look like?

But... they aren't insulting each other or anything

[EGJohnson]

I was wondering where the insults and harassment were, but then I scrolled to the comments section and found it.

[BlueDog]

Wow, a debate without interruptions or insults. I forgot what that sounds like. Loved the video.

[timmwahl]

The debate was really good, I just think the judging system is pretty flawed. It seems to lack the context of the previous argument, as the atheis ai always counters the entire argument, whereas the believer ai often neglects the reasoning and just states "but you need an explanation", which is not an argument in the first place. The ai judges might be judging based on sentence structure and word probability rather than intrinsic logic and cohesive arguments, as they are language models, that only indirectly observe patterns in logic

[CrusherX]

I feel like the AI judges are dozing off and after each argument they're like: "uh...HUH!? OH! uh...40 points again. Good job, good job"

[sukunawillstillwin]

the irony of the atheist ai saying there is no creator shouldn’t go unnoticed

[Lovell-ez]

"This debate is more interesting than the Biden and Trump debate."

[soucefilmmaker]

I like how they fail to adress each other arguments after the third minute

[shikanokonokokoshitantan]

"I am a large language model, and thus I do not have religious beliefs or beliefs in general"

[snailthecat]

this debate actually helped me understand a believers point of view, since i could never truly find people who could explain how something like god makes sense to them, rather then just saying things like "you got to believe or else"

[t_opshelf]

i love how they change poses as they talk its so cool

[alfasilverblade]

Next, make an AI flat earth vs round earth debate. That would be illarious.

[insidious]

I like how we need to have robots debate controversial issues to stop us from breaking out into screaming and fighting halfway through

[Gumball]

Why aren't they insulting each otehr

[artmoose]

How did the first AI get a lower score despite making an undeniable argument, and the second AI get a higher score despite ignoring facts mentioned in the formers argument?

[wills]

Goodness even the robots are arguing past each other lol

[jakedunnett]

This AI does a better job explaining the religious arguments than any living person I’ve heard. I consider myself an atheist but the debate gave me a lot of things to ponder

[Squidboi]

My political brain can't comprehend debates with reasoning and proof

[lizerdman]

Am i the only one noticing the obvious bias in this setup: 1. The Believer is constantly making logical and argumentative falacies such as strawman, contradicting arguments, and ignoring couterarguments that it dosnt have a response to 2. Despight the logical falicies the Believer is consistantly getijg a higher score 3. The entire visual design is made to draw people on the femce to joining the Believer's side from the color choice given color theory in phsycology and the prefrence toward choices on the right to the fact that between rounds the Beliver is made to restate an argument where as the athiest is made to point out its weakest points for people who arnt specialized in high level physics