Comparison Test: 2018 Full Size SUVs

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The Sequoia needs a full redesign but I can tell you in 10 years that will still be working perfectly fine and have the highest resale value.

Accrd
Автор

10 years later, the Seqouia 4x4 will be sold for $20, 000 while the Expedition will worth $6000 (if still running).

kamallenovo
Автор

I’ve driven that Tahoe and the luxury version of the Armada (Infiniti QX80). Both rode great and gas mileage was similar but the Infiniti QX80 performed better for me. The brakes are phenomenal, even in panic braking. Interior was very quiet compared to the Tahoe. Plus you can put regular gas in that Infiniti. The gas cap says Premium recommended not required and the horsepower to me is still great. If you can’t afford the cheapest Infiniti QX80, the Armada with the platinum trim would be a great alternative.

kalielwebb
Автор

If you want :
Reliability: Sequoia
Engine: Tahoe
Off road: Armada ( Nissan Patrol )
Technology: Expedition

faisalalmadhi
Автор

I immediately like this host. I feel like I’ve been teleported to the 60’s

xXJAKMACKXx
Автор

How did a 3.5l ecoboost get 9.8mpg and a 6.2l get 11.5mpg?! Sounds like ford wasted their time.

charlesmacgilchrist
Автор

It’s sweet to see him still doing this

geoffmorrow
Автор

This was a total bias review to help push the EcoBoost motor and this is coming from a Ford guy.

I think overall they're really trying to push these twin turbo 6 cylinder and 4 cylinder engines in these big SUVs I'm sorry as long as I'm buying a full-size SUV I want a V8 under my hood not no V6 with two turbos that's probably not going to get to 100, 000 miles before you start having problems I rather have a all motor V8

wickedvq
Автор

Reliability - Sequoia, Armada
Style, looks - Aramada,
Power - Tahoe
Overall - Armada

TrtanX
Автор

Ill take the sequoia. Looks the best, most comfortable, durable, and reliable

samjacobs
Автор

Just got the 2017 Armada, drives like a dream, super quiet cab, insane acceleration for a big SUV, and going over 100mph still feels so smooth, like going 60, and quiet cab even at 100mph. The 3rd row has plenty of room, (2 inches more legroom than tahoe I believe with slightly less shoulder/hip than tahoe due to square shape. I can still sit back there fine and I am 6'4...When you lay all the seats down it is like 7.5 ft of space for a mattress to camp in full independent suspension...My only issue is mileage, and that's a given with any big boy SUVs. I am averaging 15.9 mpg and then the back bumper makes it look like it's got a large badonkadonk. I want to find an aftermarket rear bumper since It's the only real issue I have with it. Much cheaper than the Tahoe, of the same year and it is honestly better in every way except, the exterior of the newer Tahoe is gorgeous.

Taviah
Автор

I recently rented a Yukon XL, which is basically a Suburban, which is basically a long Tahoe. LOVED driving that truck. It drove very smoothly, got amazing fuel economy with a 5.3 L (an indicated 22mpg avg), and was very comfortable. The thing I noticed about it though, is that it was very inefficient as far as the Interior space. We also had an older Dodge Caravan rental car, and in the Yukon we could fit 3 people and 3 mountain bikes with gear, and in the minivan, we could fit four people, and 4 bikes with gear. And that was a standard wheelbase Caravan, not the long wheelbase. The relatively low ceiling height of the Yukon had us laying the bikes down, while the much higher ceiling of the Caravan allowed us to stand the bikes up.

If one does not need to tow, and all-wheel drive is not a big concern, as uncool as they look the minivan is still the most practical choice as far as interior space and people moving capability.

trailrunnah
Автор

Why not use the sequoia limited or platinum?

Olph
Автор

Sorry, but the interior of the Armada was designed in 2012 yet looks better than the Expedition.

crazyone
Автор

BUY USED. DO NOT PAY FOR HIGH DEPRECIATION THE FIRST YEAR. 👍💰💰💰👍

focusedmessagemarketing
Автор

All are nice. I’d personally take the Sequoia or the Tahoe because I think in the long run, both will hold better and are simple common engines.

COYGunners
Автор

Yes rather get the Toyota last slot longer than the rest tech is not everything would prefer the older simple designed of the Toyota

ryanloveshonda
Автор

The Chevrolet Tahoe RST makes no sense at all. Why not just get a GMC Yukon Denali? Toyota needs to redesign or kill of the aging Sequoia.

gedaman
Автор

Thanks for not including the dodge durango. I dont know why sometimes is mixed with real full size suvs

davidgalvan
Автор

So the Tahoe got the best MPG and best towing and it's the best looking, but it loses because the center console is too big?!?!

The Armada is ugly inside and out

turdferguson