Hitchens Clashes with Galloway on the Cause of Terrorism

preview_player
Показать описание
Christopher Hitchens argues with George Galloway on the origins of Islamic fundamentalism.

Sept. 23, 2005
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

George Galloway was so close to laughing at that mother in-law joke

calebh
Автор

I'll still never get over the fact that Maher said he thought Milo Yiannoncolous reminded him of a young Hitchens.... some people completely lose all sense of perspective as soon as they hear a posh boy speak.

TheIkaraCult
Автор

It’s like we are all having the same conversation over again

JonReing
Автор

Mr. Hitchens is more needed nowadays than ever. RIP.

xtsylviacary
Автор

"With every 72 virgins, they also get 72 mothers in law"
Hitchens was fckng hilarious 😂😂😂

kpl
Автор

I miss the days when real time had more than 2 guests at the table

jamesmkoenig
Автор

George doesn't find the mother-in-law joke funny!

ruthbashford
Автор

Back when we had fascinating adversaries

sudo_nym
Автор

I love Hitchens' smiling "I'm gonna rip your lungs out" look at the audience at 3:50

weareallanimals
Автор

Weird how this was chosen since I just watched the 2000’s on CNN

joansnow
Автор

Hitchens also conveniently focused on Iraq when it was very well known that most of the so called hijackers where from Saudi Arabia. Not a word said.

bryanbelshaw
Автор

Hitchens seems to be criticizing what he perceives to be Galloway’s hypocrisy more than his actual statements. Not his best day. Galloway is presenting a more useful, cogent argument. PS Maher is the worst😂

jdagni
Автор

Ultimately Hitchens was a little short-sighted at the beginning with the "I think Bin Laden was one of a kind" comments, if he'd lived to see ISIS maybe he would've changed his opinion.

sco
Автор

I'm Iranian and let me tell you this:
Even though I agree with something Galloway says This guy is on everysingle State run media. He was on press Tv and I just saw him on RT(Russia owned station in English)

d-thec-tieve
Автор

Here I think history has proven Hitchens wrong. Nothing lasting or worth the cost was achieved in Afghanistan. It is, or soon will be, pretty much the same as it was before the US invasion, among other things, a graveyard of empires.

jeffallcock
Автор

Can you upload the whole thing please?

chrisdec
Автор

Back when you could still have a real debate about what’s going on

bartattack
Автор

5:45 I didn't realise George Galloway of all people had said that first.

joecurran
Автор

Hitchens was riddled with contradictions and I’m afraid Galloway toasted him on this issue. Gore Vidal came to a similar conclusion with Hitchens, he was blinded by his own ascetic hatred of Islam to the point he backed an illegal war. He was a smart, but the smart-arse got in his own way.

MrZedhow
Автор

It’s a shame a lot of Christopher’s arguments were timely, and thus not as useful today. Then again, he has arguments that are Timeless. He was the rarest of birds. He’s missed!

johnruggiero