Ukraine Challenger 2 Tanks Destruction Tactic #shorts

Ukraine Challenger 2 Tanks Destruction Tactic #ukrainenews

[showery]

This is why Scott Ritter is not a scientist but a marine. If it was true iraq would be “Chernobyl”

[spittyboii]

As a Brit I would like to thank all the Americans in this comment section who can see past these bullshit reports and understand how capable the Chally 2 really is

[maxviking]

Scott Ritter? A convicted sex abuser that exposed himself to minors online.. yeah that guy has a lot of credibility 😂😂

[steveroe]

As a 10 year veteran of the Royal Tank Regiment I find all of the this "forcast" a load of bollocks lmao 🤣
+ US intelligence has zero intelligence in it

[allthetimeitgoeslikethat]

FORMER for a reason. Those Brit tanks are solid, just like our Abrams. They will be fine.

[Grumpylove]

Awww little Ritter wants some attention and like a toddler, he doesn’t care how he gets it or, how it makes those around him look like complete fekwits, bless his cotton little socks.

[kikishoshannacarter]

Scott does not have much intelligence. 😅😂😂He doesn't know our Ukraine. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ♥️

[dungton]

So how the forecast looking right now? Apparently 1-2 Challenger II tanks was destroyed (critic still debate whether it was artillery bombardment or land mine) and i believe 5-6 of the US tank supply. I forgot how many Leopard was destroyed but from what I can tell, the Challenger II even if there’s only Twelve being sent to Ukraine, is proving it self to be worthy even if it 30 years old now. I just hope the British Gov would send the Challenger III for test drive and improve because nothing is a better teacher than the main battlefield

[Null]

As an American i would like to disown that guy because what the fuck prediction is that.

"The depleted uranium will contaminate the battlefield!!" But its fine for our abrams tanks to use it because all of a sudden its magically ok for us?

"Theyll be destroyed the moment they hit the battlefield!!" 1). TANK gets DESTROYED in WAR?!?! NO WAY!!!! 😱 😲 😱 😲 No shit sherlock thats kinda what happens and 2). The chal 2 is renowned for being a reliable and extremely effective tank. This shit if destroyed would likely have taken out at least a 5-1 kill loss ratio imo

[DARKSTAR-mnee]

Destroyed in a warehouse in western Ukraine 🤗💖🇷🇺👍

[ysy]

Scotty Ritter... all I need to know...

[williambarratt]

I love how he uses the words American and intelligence in the same sentence when the Russians couldn’t knock out a paper bag with a battleship

[srblackbirddr]

Any tank can be lost but I'd put the Chally 2 up against anything.

[richardjohnson]

Depleted Uranium bad for Ukrainians, ok with Iraqi's and Afghanistani's....

[yotatrd.]

The Challenger 2 is one of the most capable MBT’s in the planet. Like the Leo 2 and Abrams when deployed correctly and with a trained crew they will perform better than there Russian counterparts. War is hell and no man made weapon is indestructible.

[randallhibbs]

So Ritter is US intelligence? Not, he’s a Russian shrill

[kevinmulligan]

Scot ritter us a convicted child sex offender.

[mrnostalgialover]

Oh yeah the challenger 2, the tank with the thickets straight up armor out of all the modern main battle tanks, that absolute beast would demolish any Russian tin can sent its way. And depleted uranium shells don’t produce anywhere near enough radiation to be harmful. They’re called DEPLETED for a reason, they’re essentially just a really dense metal, that’s cheaper than tungsten, that can just shred through tanks like it’s nothing. If using these rounds would make all of Ukraine into Chernobyl, why is Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and all the other places that tanks using depleted uranium shells not insanely irradiated? Don’t believe dumb ass russian propaganda 🇺🇸🤝🇬🇧

[tonycavanagh]

An American predicts, if a Tank enters combat, it could be destroyed.
Wow, now that us some real deep thinking.

[paulmorgan]

Tanks get blown up in war .. Russia knows as it's lost over 2000 now 😂😂😂 👍