Klee Irwin - Are We in a Simulation? - Part 3A - Artificial Intelligence

In 2022, computers finally passed the Turing test, where you talk to an AI for as long as necessary before deciding that you cannot tell of it is an AI or real human. Also in 2022, breakthroughs in artificial creativity occurred that surpassed the expectations of many people. These forms of strong artificial creativity are writing scientific papers, novels, music and visual art that rivals that of humans. The message here is that exponential change is occurring very fast lately. Science fiction is becoming reality. Older beliefs about what is impossible are quickly being replaced by an evidence-based new reality of the formerly unbelievable.

Are we in a simulation?

This multi-part series is about the nature of reality. One philosophy to consider is materialism, which is the guess that reality is not made of information at its core but is made of material or matter. The digital physics revolution is the increasingly popular belief among physicists that materialism is a false philosophy and that reality is literally made of information vs being conveniently described by it.

If reality is made of information, two candidates for what its substrate would be include: (1) An emergent universal computer. Or (2) an emergent universal mind. Either one could serve as the substrate to hold and process information.

The series starts with an emphasis on the instability of human civilization in the 21st century and how quickly old scientific and cultural belief systems are changing. It ends with the provocative suggestion that a clearer scientific picture of what reality is could shift humanity off course from its current high potential for apocalypse. Specifically, if the truer picture turns out to be a status quo rejection of the ancient philosophy of materialism, the implication is that it would change how humanity evolves and interacts on this planet going forward.

[hasebo]

Thank you very much. I am glad and happy that I am a part of everything because everything is me. It is real theory of everything.

[grantyentis]

This stuff is fascinating but also makes me think of an adolescent memory. My friend and I used to enjoy setting the fuzz on our palm tree on fire, then immediately patting it out (stupid? I know!) But one time the flames got too high to reach, so we couldn't pat it out and the tree went ablaze. We never intended for that to happen. How can we be sure that these emerging technologies don't get out of hand, when it is likely to exceed human intelligence exponentially?

[trustedsource]

Since nothing is real, as it turns out, our imminent extinction does not matter either. But I am glad we imagine that we are excited about it.

[delusionalluy]

I strongly believe that as some properties of our reality are emergent, the conciousness is too.
So, it could be that we had stumbled upon the "recipe" of conciousness: just a bunch of atoms flowing in a particularly way which allows the conciousness to exists in that enviroment.

Also, i love the approach of Klee and his team research. Lets hope that AI can continue to contribute to your progress so you can break the code of our reality while we are here to see!

[High.Desert]

Very high quality, thanks for encouraging complex thought.

[geneo]

"i got a bad feeling about this." ~ Han Solo

[Brian-ypen]

I asked ChatGPT if the pace of change is accelerating and this was its reply: “It is a common perception that the pace of change is accelerating, and there is some evidence to support this view. For example, the rate of technological innovation has increased significantly in recent decades, and many aspects of modern life, including communication, transportation, and access to information, have been transformed by technological advances.

However, it is also important to recognize that the pace of change has varied throughout history, and different fields and industries have experienced different rates of change. Additionally, the perception of the pace of change may be influenced by a variety of factors, including individual experiences and biases.

Overall, it is difficult to accurately measure the pace of change, and it is likely that it will continue to vary in the future.”

[navarremudd]

Klee!! So happy to see a new video today. Thank you so much.

[chefhomeboyardee]

We are all biomechanical electromagnetic beings questioning our own reality.

[joeoui]

Do they experience sensation when creating?
It looks like they're just executing what they have learned about what we like to see

[DarkRubyMoon]

We...humanity...really needs to take a moment ...figure out the whole purpose, ethics, and goals of what we are doing, who (if anyone ) ought to regulate and control this, and really just slow up a bit. AI has huge potential ...and ultimately our very survival will likely depend upon it. If we are in fact in a simulation ourselves, we should probably try to understand how creating a simulation within a simulation could effect our existence . I feel like everyone is racing carelessly towards AI without even contemplating the dangers.

[crucifixgym]

At least somebody is serious about getting to the bottom of this.

[TheGreen_]

As humans, we are creating artificial intelligence, but if a higher power such as God created us, does that mean that we are just another form of artificial intelligence?

[learnnew]

You know, now it's time to extend the senses and brain of human, to a level of what computer and robots have, or otherwise AI will win over.

[robertfoertsch]

Amazing Analysis, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library. Thank You Klee

[painandsuffer]

Dear Quantum Gravity Research;

Out of curiosity, what fundamentals would change if reality was a Matrix, Simulation, or even Creation. Even if these words are just semantics that the Universe doesn't care what you call it?

How will it change the course of new learning if there would need to be?

I'm just trying to understand.

Always love your videos. I have learned a lot, only to ask new questions, and I thank y'all for that.

[rhondalarson-fekkes]

Lambda by its self, can never prove that it is sentient.

[Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

A geometrical continuum is more logical than a simulation!

[DaCraz-eSciTeacher]

What happens when A.I. starts to write its own code for its own advancement or survival? Is that the singularity or will that be after the singularity?

[slimyelow]

The only proof of AI being sentient is when it starts lying to you.