TOPAZ PHOTO AI (New Update/Version 3.2) FIRST LOOK

Topaz Affiliate Links:

TOPAZ PHOTO AI has been recently updated. Today we'll be getting a First Look at the latest update, Version 3.2.

Affiliate Links for Software I use and recommend:

Use Promo Code DK15

DXO Affiliate Links:
DXO PhotoLab 7 Affiliate Link:
DXO Filmpack 7 Affiliate Link:
DXO ViewPoint Affiliate Link:

ON1 Software Affiliate Link:
Use PROMO CODE DAVIDKELLY
Coupon valid for 20% off a purchase at ON1 Coupon is not applicable to subscriptions and cannot be combined with other discounts or promotions.

Skylum Software Affiliate Links:
Use Promo Code DAVEKELLY to receive a $10 Discount
Discount does not apply to sale items...

#TopazLabs #TopazPhotoAi #FirstLook

[charlesfisher]

Great job! I've learned so much from you. Please keep those videos for topaz AI coming. Thank you very much

[kc]

Thank you! I take a lot of pictures of birds and squirrels and I'm finding the Natural looks so much better. Fur/feathers don't look so crunchy! Go Topaz! Go Dave!

[kenmorris]

Great review of Topaz Photo AI update. Cheers from Nova Scotia...

[stevedirector]

Tony - great bonus video. I wanted alert you and your followers to a problem I have been having using Topaz Photo AI via Lightroom ever since version 3.0 came out and see if others have experienced the same thing.. Specifically, the issue is that the file that Photo AI returns to LR may be missing the EXIF data that was contained in the original RAW file. After hours (days!) of experimentation I think I have identified the cause my problem. My normal workflow has been to have LR simultaneously rename my RAW file and convert it to DNG upon import. I then send that file (which contains the EXIF data of the original RAW file) to Topaz Photo AI as you do, but the file that is returned to LR is missing the EXIF data. However, if I do not have LR rename the file on input - but only have it convert the RAW file to a DNG file (the DNG file still retains the EXIF data) - then rename the DNG file inside of LR (that is after it is imported into LR) - and then send the renamed DNG file to Photo AI, the file Photo AI returns does contain the EXIF data that was in both the original RAW and DNG file. I have had some others confirm that this has been their experience as well. I have been working with the Topaz and Adobe folks on this issue but so far it has not been resolved.

[hischildjo]

This was a great video, thank you! I just started using Topaz Photo AI 3.2 a few days ago and I must say I'm impressed. I've just begun practicing the export option from DXO 8 Elite to Topaz, choosing the appropriate suggested Camera files (have a Canon T7 Rebel) and have been pretty successful. Quite the difference between the two programs, but am finding out how nice it is to have both! Still lots to learn and am glad I found your channel!

[josdenis]

Thanks for this so useful tutorial, Dave. One does always learn something that passed unnoticed!

[SolidYellowLine]

Another very useful tutorial. Thanks Dave!

[vkmccable]

Love your videos. Always come away with a new skill. Thank you !

[hjbpsi]

again an excellent video, thanks Dave!

[peterferst]

Thanks Dave-as usual well explained, much appreciated.

[MedusaJellyFish]

Thank you for making this wonderful video ❤🎉❤

[NicolasAlexanderOtto]

I would love to see how the denoise algorithm works on starry skies because Adobe and the old DxO and topaz do all have problems with it causing artifacts.

[stevethompson]

I am a Nikon guy. I TRIED THE REFOCUS with an image I stacked, which was a dng file after stacking and the refocus image came back with the colors matching very good in the area that was sharp BUT the out of focus background was much brighter and extremely saturated.

[axelmatthies]

The new sharpening model Lens Blur V2 produces a lot of artefacts. The results of other new model "Natural" aren't much better. Both models are unusable for me. The nest thing is that there's a visible color shift in the files that are created with PAI 3.2. The .tif files are in a warmer color temparature as the original. This result I can't use for further processing. At the moment I go back ti Sharpener AI 4.1. This works fine.

[TufferImages]

Comon Topaz, we all want a Comparison view.

[jtepsr]

Dave if I had to chose one ai editor, would you pick topaz or nik and why. I shoot mostly landscape and wildlife, birds in particular

[elke]

Before and after - I don't see any big differences. I'm still using the old version before the first paid update and it will stay that way for me.

[jeffriggins]

Hi Dave! since you generally use a linear profile as a starting point for editing, doesn’t this make it difficult? Linear profiles give a flatter duller image than say camera faithfu so how would you work around that?

[kenwilcox]

I find most often whatever option you pick this software does little to make photos better. I have many times find it makes things worse.

[DomBastian]

Could you show us how it works with portraits ? Topaz Sharpen AI was so good for portraits, but with photo AI it's very bad 🤔🤔