Health Risks of Mobile Phone RF Radiation Explained 📵 - Dr Devra Davis | Highlights

preview_player
Показать описание

DR DEVRA DAVIS[1]
Davis works on disease prevention and environmental health factors. She served as the President Clinton appointee to the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board from 1994 to 1999. She was Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, and presently acts as President of Environmental Health Trust. She lectures at American and European universities and her research has been covered in major scientific publications as well as being highlighted on major media outlets like CNN, CSPAN, CBC, BBC, and public radio.

She has also authored more than 190 publications in books and journals ranging from The Lancet and the Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American and The New York Times, and writes for blogs such as Freakonomics in the New York Times, in The Huffington Post, and elsewhere.

NON-IONIZING RF RADIATION
Non-ionizing radiation has been scientifically linked to the reduction of testosterone, memory loss, learning ability and even cancer in rats[2][3].

REFERENCES

COMPANION VIDEOS
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks for sharing. So using Bluetooth headphones wouldn’t help much? Better wired headphones?

Elskins
Автор

This probably saved a buncha years in my life. I literally sleep watching something on my phone

punchabunchabuttons
Автор

Being a Ham operator and Electronics technician since 1975... this information is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT! IT IS TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY! Smart intelligent people understand this information .

kenw.
Автор

There are other videos that are showing graphs and study reports saying that it isn't harmful as shown in this video .
I mean which is it, is it harmful or not .

rahulpatra
Автор

Look up corona in a dictionary. Comes in waves, can’t see it, can’t smell it, can’t taste it. Phones are one issue, Wi-Fi is another.

purplebutterfly
Автор

Insightful and useful video. Thank you for sharing. I wish this knowledge was more widespread. 👌

drnora
Автор

Imagine what all the electrosmog is doing to inects and plant life. USA has already lost 97% of its bumble bee population, I dunno what the stats are for normal bees

celticcc
Автор

Lately I've been following this subject closely while trying to adapt a cautionary lifestyle with these devices like putting my cellphone on airplane mode while asleep, picking up calls mostly on headset's or loud speaker..used to get these terrible migraines every year or so for the past 6 years and now I'm two years I'm free of it ..with 5G looming around the corner I can only imagine this getting worst 😩

king
Автор

Greetings from Finland or as we sometimes call it Nokialand. Truth about cell phone radiation isn't coming from Finland even though Finland is to blame about starting this modern epidemic. 6G is already being planned. And Nato has Finland now as ally. And that what 6G is best suited > used as a military weapon. 6G is not good for communication purposes. Finland is a small country and too much of it's GDP comes from revenue created by Nokia. If we lose money coming from Nokia we loose too much of our tax money. But science must but end to companies like Nokia. And even Oulu University is involved with 6G. Please Devra Davis could you contact Oulu university and discuss how much harm they are about to cause with 6G. New paper are not allowed to write about the harms of 5G ja 6G. They are suppose to be journalists not scientists. Finland has also set the base towers to send more powerful signal than countries like Italy where the base tower sends ten times less powerful signal. And one of the Finnish telephone operators was given the access to a list ranking 100 most ethical companies. How outrageous! I am sad to live in a country where we are surrounded by tech fanatic engineers that are so full with technology optimism. Thank you Devra Davis for all the good work you have done!

alpotuura
Автор

She is lying about what is shown in the rf exposure section in the phone settings It says this "iPhone is evaluated in positions that simulate uses against the head, with no separation, and when worn or carried against the torso of the body, with 5mm separation." Meaning that they have been tested in these positions (in the pocket) and have been shown to be safe?

steezi
Автор

There is an increase found. CNN article:

"Brain tumors on the rise in England, raising cell phone concerns" - CNN, Wed May 2, 2018

VenturaIT
Автор

Please please ans my mobile sar value is 0.72 watts per kilogram is it hramfull

abhinababarus
Автор

My Tenmars EMF reader just came today, same one you use in your videos. I've been going around testing everything. This is alarming. Thanks for the video. 💯

Slimothy
Автор

Microwave Radiation just emits heat energy for anyone concerned and the word Radiation isn’t doesn’t mean deadly this video has no reliable reasearch.

alexzarco
Автор

What are your thoughts of RF Ionising vs Non-ionising radiation?

petersuvara
Автор

I rarely make calls and I rarely, make calls
It's always at arms length when viewing or gaming. And most important now after this video my phone will be on other side of room when asleep and off. It's always off at night anyways. As the pocket, not sure how to word this one.

josepherickson
Автор

Is non ionizing radiation 🤦‍♂️ is not dangerous

BarudakNews
Автор

No offense but more women stay on there phones way more then men

snickers
Автор

I love conspiracy theories, it's like urban legends - fan but not true

kirylkrasouski
Автор

This is very educational. I hope everyone would get the chance to watch this.

pell