A tricky derivative using the limit definition #calculus

🌟Support the channel🌟

🌟my other channels🌟

🌟My Links🌟

🌟How I make Thumbnails🌟

🌟Suggest a problem🌟

[matheusjahnke]

You can also do it by writing the fractional powers as 4th roots and rationalizing the numerator(then simplifying)

[callmedeno]

Just curious, anyone else on their math journey (self-study) get a bit intimidated by seeing so many shorts on different topics? It's like a constant reminder of different directions to go in and how little you know. I am not complaining about it but just curious do others learning math get a bit overwhelmed when just browsing along?

[urnoob]

thought this was first principle at first cuz it looked similar

[darcash]

If x->a, then a->x, too ye? So the end you should interchange the a with x

[alis]

Gives us another reason to appericate the pwr rule

[jontedeakin]

Thank you for ahowing these! I really appreciate it and they help a lot! Please keep doung them 😊

[Joedex]

Let's not do that again I already passed that class please stop make it stop please aauughh

[gdmathguy]

you can simply just do the definition of derivative limit on x^a, find out that it always results in ax^(a-1) and then apply that to this question

[anyabureau]

Cancel with the numerator at Uncle Chuck’s Cabin Rental

[devonpulley]

goes from english to mathenese real quick

[slamfire]

That mine as well be chicken scratch to me