Soft Natural vs Theatrical Romantic

preview_player
Показать описание
Soft Natural vs Theatrical Romantic
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

As a photographer, her photo is taken from the top down while scarlets is hip height. Then Kim and Sydney are wearing floor length dresses hiding their feet while Florence has a mid calf hem cutting the vertical line short. Camera angle and styling affect the optics.

Lizxmichele
Автор

There is no way that Florence is a Theatrical Romantic. She does not have any of the sharpness of a TR and does not look great with overly glamorous looks like every other verified TR.

BbGun-lwvi
Автор

Yesss. I was so confused. To me she looks more like a gamine

ascha
Автор

She doesn’t have wide shoulders but she’s definitely a soft natural because she’s overall very wide. Clothing has to accommodate for her width also her muscle is predominant.

SongofBeauty
Автор

You don't need to have width in your features to have width in your Kibbe line is what I've learned. I'm a Soft Natural and as soon as I started dressing my small shoulders with width everything came together!

laurenwild
Автор

She is totally a soft gamine. What I see people missing about soft gamine which I think causes a lot of mistyping of SG, is that SG have a fuller look while still have a petite frame and short proportions. Vanessa Hudgens, I would argue, is also a SG - she has a petite frame with short proportions whilst also having a softer, fuller look.

annasiegler
Автор

soft naturals can look short !!!! she is a soft natural she has blunt bones i've been studying kibbe for over 7years please stop confusing people by giving out misinformation

fairykittenxx
Автор

She is a SN. Florence is 5'4. That is considered petite. SNs can be 5'4. Britney Spears is a SN and is 5'4. Florence does have width in her shoulders. She looks sporty. She is not a TR or a SG. What you are seeing in Florence is her essence. That is what's confusing you. She has a combined essence of gamine, ingenue, and dramatic. The red outfit doesn't look bad on her, due to the bit of dramatic essence she has. However, it is not her best look. SNs can have short limbs. Britney spears and Jessica Simpson are both SNs and have short limbs. The body types are not a monolith. Not everyone within a particular body will be exactly the same. Kibbe has stated himself that one should not compare. It will only lead to confusion. There are variations within each of the types. In other words, one SN will not look EXTACTLY like another SN. One dramatic will not look exactly like another dramatic. For example, Tilda Swinton and Taylor Swift are both dramatics. Yet, their bodies are not the same. Also, their essences are different. Tilda is a D with an ethereal essence and Taylor is a D with an ingenue and gamine essence. Checkout McJimsey's essence system. It helped me a lot.

jewelryboxballerina
Автор

You have all the heights wrong. Scarlett, Florence, and Sweeney are 5’3.” Kim is 5’2.”
And the photo you used for Scarlett is shot at an angle that makes it look like she has a long vertical line. What makes Florence look so short is that she has a short neck.
There is no way that Florence is a Theatrical Romantic. She does not have any of the sharpness of a TR and does not look great with overly glamorous looks like every other verified TR.

BbGun-lwvi
Автор

Florence face is very yang, i totally agree with you

joi
Автор

The heights in the video are wrong. Kim is 157 cm, Florence is 159 cm, Scarlett is 160 cm, and Sydney is 161 cm.

English.Nazmeen
Автор

Florence looks like me. I'm a soft gamine so I'd guess she's probably that. Soft gamines can have shoulders that are quite squarish/ boxy which she definitely has

brunettemouse
Автор

I would say also that some SN have small frame but wide hips and shoulder and look i little taller than other shorter types.

melannydayrethratliff
Автор

TBC vertical is just elongation, straightness (no interruption from curve) found between shoulders and knees or length (automatic). It doesn’t depend on how good you are at estimating height.

yesme
Автор

Sg and TR look similar, I agree that Alexa Demie is a TR because although she looks very petite she is not as sharp or squareish ins shoulder as a sg . Alexa looks mores soft rounded and delicate. Florence on the other hand does look to me like a SG, she looks more squareish in shoulder and body and maybe that’s why people may think that she’s a SN, confusing squareish features with shoulder Kibbe width. Also if you watch the movie Hello darling, she’s seems too look really good with more short and crisp lines.

colochossalvajes
Автор

Florence and Alexa looks more SG to me. First thing i see from them is petite, and then some curve, and lastly sharpness in their body.
With TR first thing i notice is curves, and then petite, and lastly some sharpness. Both are pretty similar!

ramenudoll
Автор

no cause Florence always seemed like such a gamine to me

melissaanthonyxb
Автор

But isn’t Alexa a soft gamine? How is she a theatrical romantic instead?

winxclubstellamusa
Автор

She could be a dramatic classic. That's like SN, but with more hip, slightly less shoulder

carolineloop
Автор

You're making the mistake of thinking vertical has anything to do with your perceived height. That's not the case. Vertical is the absence of curve

ang