Atheist Debates - DebateCon 3.1 Debate reviews

preview_player
Показать описание
I attended and participated in DebateCon 3.1 and while I don't typically post reviews of other people's debates - I decided to briefly address the 3 other debates that took place at this event.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

'Going to debate Daniel so no one else ever has to.'
Gotta love Matt's confidence. And he's justified for it. This will be a cerebral smackdown for the ages!

dfm
Автор

I'm both excited for and dreading your upcoming debate with Daniel.

the_Hermanoid
Автор

My Uncle died of cancer, and the last time I spoke to him was me explaining who you were and speaking about your debates and how interesting they are. I’ll always remember him and you fondly. Even if it’s sappy and silly, you mean a lot to me Matt. Ignoring all the good content you produce, it’ll always be a treasured memory. Seems stupid, now that I think about it, to talk about the possibility of there being no afterlife with a dying man. Thank you, Matt.

BootupProcess
Автор

The debate with Daniel was sickening. I couldn’t even finish it. I almost think the police need to confiscate the dudes PREDATOR laptop. I almost suspect they will find some heinous illegal shit stored on it.

eqprog
Автор

It is such a power move to publish your opening statement so early, Matt. The idea of putting consent as the main focus is going to be what makes Daniel fail to justify his position.

Agent.
Автор

I think it's a pity that Daniel isn't under serious scrutiny by authorities.

pamigreenway
Автор

Matt Dillahunty you are my hero, you are an inspirational force for the progress of humanity. Thank you.

skepticsinister
Автор

I would say that the word is not just "consent", but consent from a mind developed enough to know what it is that it's consenting to. That it is aware of all its implications, socially, physically, and the impact to his/her future. Because you can get a child to "yes" even when their inner self doesn't want or is aware of why.

xelasomar
Автор

Matt: "I'm about to end this man's career"

rachelfey
Автор

1:45

My heart was broke when you left the ACA as a host. You, Forrest, Dr.Ben, and Katie are my favorites. I still watch for the latter, but it hasnt been the same without the Dillahunty.

I am SUPER happy to see you have a YT channel with hundreds of videos. I intend to watch all of them because you are, hands down, my favorite secular advocate. Cheers Matt!

YourSooFakeSauce
Автор

Ra and Tjump are some of my favourite debaters and are very smart! I just thought it was a really bad discussion! It sounded like two theists arguing whose religion is better!

haactgaming
Автор

Daniel rivals Jordan Peterson on his dishonesty and slippery nature. If there's anyone that can handle that kind of shit, it's Mr. Dillahunty.

Thanks so much for everything you continue to do, Matt. From an ex-muslim.

Orbsaladin
Автор

Hope Matt has a good time at Debatcon.

patrickboyle
Автор

"I'll have a debate with him, so nobody else have to"

Doing the "lords" work Matt😅

ShutUpWesley
Автор

Hope you see this. Daniel posted a review of his debate in which he had a fake doctor going trough the studies shown by IP and misrapresented and lied about those studies to support his pdfile position.
I hope there will be large channels pushing back on the sickness advocated by these child predators for the sake of children.
I have a 9 years old child and this HORRIFIES ME!

Cognitivebluess
Автор

So glad to see ads popping up on your videos now. I’m planning to go back and binge watch your older videos to make a small ‘contribution’ to the amazing work you have done and continue to do. You helped me get through an extremely severe case of religious trauma syndrome and I continue to follow you for the lols. 😄🤪

lyricduo
Автор

I love you Matt! Thanks for everything you do. You helped me see the flaws in religion

letswatchutube
Автор

Impressive, Matt, you truly have the ability to get to the core of an issue. The key concept in these matters is undoubtedly consent. However, I suggest adding the word "mature" to it, thus forming the phrase "mature consent." It's plausible that a 9-year-old could give consent, but it's important to consider the maturity level required for valid consent, as well as the potential for indoctrination of children into certain ideologies. This is particularly relevant when it comes to controversial topics and beliefs that children may be exposed to, which could influence their ability to give informed and unbiased consent.

paul
Автор

You know why there was no mentioning of male children married off? Because under Islam older men marry little girls and not vice versa.
You do not see old women marrying little boys, or little boys married to little girls.
It is mostly adult males with female children because the old male is considered the provider in the family.
It is all disgisting, but you know why.

xsi
Автор

9:35 yeah, someone asked this question, and Kenny said he would accept it

skeptic_Todd