Rigid Body Baking Speed 2.79 vs 2.8 #Blender

In this comparison I tested the baking/simulation speed of the rigid body physics engine in Blender 2.79 and Blender 2.8 to see which one was quicker and by how much.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Background Music:
(N/A) by (N/A)
Available free to use and monetize without credit from the YouTube Music Library.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FIND ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

Facebook

BitChute

BlendSwap

Blender Rookie URL:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DONATE:

SubscribeStar

Paypal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Software I Use:

Live Streaming: OBS(freeware)

3D Editor: Blender 3D (freeware)

Video Editor: Cyberlink PowerDirector14 (payware)

MP4 Encoder: HandBrake (freeware)

Audio Editor: Audacity (freeware)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My Hardware:

Desktop
Motherboard: Asrock B350
CPU: Ryzen 5 1600X
2X - GPU: Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB
RAM: 32GB GSkill Ripjaws 4 X 8GB
500GB NVME Western Digital Black
COOLING: Arctic Freezer 240mm AIO

Laptop
HP Envy Laptop (model# 15-k253ca)
CPU i7-4720hq
No GPU
16GB RAM (Crucial)
240 GB SSD (Western Digital)
1 TB HDD (Toshiba)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Keywords & Hashtags:

#BlenderRender #Blender3D #Freeware #Animation #CGI #VFX #Simulation #ComputerGenerated #Mischief #PowerDirector #Cyberlink #VideoEditor #ParticleFluids #ParticleSystem #BulletTime #GPU #CPU #TimeLapse #SpeedModeling #BlenderRookie #Ryzen #ArcticFreezer #GTX1060
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I am a Blender rookie teaching myself how to use Blender. I am posting my animations on this channels for people to see and critique.

[infotoons]

One of the big deals the blender foundation was talking about with 2.8 was how much faster it would be. At least they fixed the mouse button settings so you can use left select. Muscle memory is my big hang up.

[GaryParris]

another interesting thing would be to see how another computer with exactly the same setups would calculate it side by side comparisons of the resulting frames not the speed. with measurement markers in all axis to see what the spreads and debris radius etc, chances are the calculations between sources is affected by slight differences in precision and other factors that are not evident on face value, even a simple misplacement of any object even by a fraction could be changing it, but the speed improvement is still evident and positive :O)

[jeffg]

Was just thinking about the difference - I don't know anything about the underlying engine, but wondered if any settings in the physics have any random-based values that caused the diff?