Episode 1: Marxism-Leninism-Maoism with J. Moufawad-Paul

An interview with author and professor of philosophy J. Moufawad-Paul on his book Continuity and Rupture, which touches on the topic of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.

Follow us on:

[cardonag]

You deserve more subscribers. Us comrades must unite to promote work by other fellow revolutionaries

[xiaoyanzhang]

Really like your interview style, for each part, you kind of summarize it up so it becomes easier to understand and follow. Great job!

[MartialVillager]

Best explanation of MLM that i've heard, glad you've started this podcast.

[advancedspacesocialism]

This is beautiful. We need more comrades to make the theory accessible. Just in the first 5 mins and loving it. Thanks for putting in the effort with this one. Solidarity

[mariastilwell]

This was a really good listen !! Also please have some sort of a schedule and don't just disappear like KropoTse-Tung/Sober Senses. Good luck and I look forward to the next episode !!

[abrahamWeizfeldPhD]

Note that the British Embassy in HK translated the documents issued during the Cultural Revolution. These should still be available but my essay was lost. The Shangai commune was most important and those proclemations.

[abrahamWeizfeldPhD]

This is a ne dimension of the RCP that I know in Montréal. Congratulations. We are working with th e Panther C.O.D.E Maoist formation in AmeriKKKa together in the United Inter-National Communalist Convergence.

[Pasadena-]

Nice stuff nice stuff. Whats your opinion if you've have watched Jason Unruhe or Finnishbolshevik?

[MrNeverpeter]

Excellent stuff! How often are you hoping to make new episodes?

[luwewenn]

Long live Chairman Gonzalo! Long live Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, principally Maoism!

[nbn]

Hi, I'm a complete idiot and as a result every video I heard talking about this topic made no sense to me, your video help me understand however I stoped understanding after like 20m which is a shame, so I was hoping to ask some questions: right so am I right in thinking Maoism is an extention of Marxism-Lenism in which it modernized around china and tries to stick to a revolutionary outlook as apposed to reformist and that is were they differ from the soviets at the time also am I right in thinking they want the people to keep the party in check and be in control to stop capatilism and corruption getting back in. Am I also right in thinking leninism is an extention upon marxism and stalinism is an extention or leninism. Also whats the difference between what ever you want to call it and troskism, I remember reading that troskism was baised around reform or something or other and the other was about revolution but im honestly not shaw. Also is reformism were you want to take the current poitical system and mold it into socialism and then communism and want peace with everyone else and try the sway them to your point of view and revolutionarism is were you want to revolutionise the current system into a socialist state aimed on achieving communism and want to take everyone over and make them take on your views? What does the ism part of these names mean? Do these idiologise want to keep socialism or move onto communism eventually or does it differ between them?

Thank you so much if you actually went to the evort of reading all of this shite and an even bigger thanks if you are able to anwser any of my questions!

On a seperate note from my perspecitive the current chinese government seems pretty corrupt and not bent on trying to achieve the orgional goals of the party or do you think its just capatalist properganda?

[MystMusa]

good shit my g, I'm doing similar work

[abrahamWeizfeldPhD]

Do you know Jason Unruhe Maoist Rebel News..

[fun_ghoul]

This may be irrelevant three years on, but the music is very distracting. If you get to making more vids, or if someone else reads this who plans to, _please_ skip the soundtrack!

[wp]

Wouldn't it make more sense to refer to yourself as a member of the working class instead of adherimg to race?

[jeffmax]

I have put this on your Twitter page: Soviet Union 20 million, China (under Mao) 65 million, Vietnam 1 million, North Korea 2 million, Cambodia 2 million, Eastern Europe 1 million, Latin America 150, 000, Africa 1.7 million, Afghanistan 1.5 million. Guess what these numbers do not represent people that have voted for the shit you preach they are people that died because of it. Phew, had a real busy day, had to get Bruce Gilley's paper on Colonialism (ah, you know the one) copied to all my students. Strange, I'd never heard of the guy until you tried UNSUCESSFULLY to censor him. Thanks for that comrade Paul. Maybe someone should go to Change.org and give you a taste of the same medicine.

[d.incubus]

What was the name of the Chinese scholar and the work JMP cited at the end about the nature of class in China?