filmov
tv
Should You Train to Failure for Muscle Growth? (New Study)
Показать описание
Training to failure is one of the most debated topics in the fitness world. But what does the research say? Is training to failure essential for muscle growth?
A recent 2020 study by Lacerda et al. explored this. 10 untrained men had one leg assigned failure condition, while their other leg was assigned to non-failure condition. Both legs were trained with the unilateral leg extension for 3-4 sets with 50-60%1RM, 2-3 times per week for 14 weeks. As ecpected the failure leg trained each set to failure, while the non-failure leg kept roughly 3-2 reps in reserve on the first set, 1-2 reps in reserve on the second set, and 1-0 reps in reserve on the third or fourth set. Cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis was measured before and after.
What the researchers found was that both conditions similarly increases cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis. In other words, maintaining a few reps in reserve (around 3 or less) produced similar results to training to failure.
When looking at the rest of the research, the study detailed in this video seems to summarize it quite well. Keeping a few reps in reserve (3 or less) seems to produce similar results to training to failure. But keeping a higher number of reps in reserve (roughly 5 or more) seems to be inferior to training to failure.
However, a major problem with the current research is there isn't enough research looking at trained individuals. We already know the training responses differ between trained and untrained individuals. It's possible, trained individuals may on average respond similarly to maintain a few reps in reserve and training to failure. But it's also possible they respond better to training to failure or even maintain a few reps in reserve. We unfortunately just don't know at this moment.
Something that is important I mention is that a lot of people underestimate the number of reps they can perform. In other words, many aren't good at judging how close they are to actual failure.
A 2017 study by Hackett et al. demonstrated this very idea.
81 adults with varying training experience, performed 5 sets on the chest press with 70%1RM and 5 sets on the leg press with 80% 1RM. With these loads on these exercises, you can typically perform 20 reps or less. During each set, participants were stopped at the 10th rep and asked how many further reps they think they could achieve. Then the participants immediately went back to performing reps to failure.
Looking at the results for the chest press, it's clear to see that participants underestimated the number of reps they could perform. For example, it appears that it was common for individuals to feel they could only perform 5 or 6 more when in actual fact they could perform 10 more. This was the same story for the leg press.
This is important as if you were to train with a few reps in reserve, you might underestimate the actual number of reps you left in reserve. Given this, it might be a good idea to occasionally train to failure, so you consistently remind yourself of how it feels to go to failure. thereby helping to keep you more accountable when you do leave reps in reserve.
The context of the particular exercise you are performing may also play a role in determining how close you train to failure.
With multi-joint exercises, such as squats and bench presses, maintaining correct form is integral to not only minimize the risk of injury but to also efficiently train the intended muscles. For some, especially beginners, taking multi-joint movements to failure can result in the breakdown of form, mainly due to fatigue causing a lack of concentration and awareness. Therefore, it may be a good idea to maintain a few reps in reserve with such movements.
With single-joint exercises, such as bicep curls and tricep skull crushers, there isn’t as much of a skill component with them. Therefore, fatigue is likely to have minimal effects on form (unless deliberate swinging or cheating is involved), and so training to failure is viable with such movements.
-
-
Music: Ruck P - A Tribe Called Tenz
-
References:
A recent 2020 study by Lacerda et al. explored this. 10 untrained men had one leg assigned failure condition, while their other leg was assigned to non-failure condition. Both legs were trained with the unilateral leg extension for 3-4 sets with 50-60%1RM, 2-3 times per week for 14 weeks. As ecpected the failure leg trained each set to failure, while the non-failure leg kept roughly 3-2 reps in reserve on the first set, 1-2 reps in reserve on the second set, and 1-0 reps in reserve on the third or fourth set. Cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis was measured before and after.
What the researchers found was that both conditions similarly increases cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis. In other words, maintaining a few reps in reserve (around 3 or less) produced similar results to training to failure.
When looking at the rest of the research, the study detailed in this video seems to summarize it quite well. Keeping a few reps in reserve (3 or less) seems to produce similar results to training to failure. But keeping a higher number of reps in reserve (roughly 5 or more) seems to be inferior to training to failure.
However, a major problem with the current research is there isn't enough research looking at trained individuals. We already know the training responses differ between trained and untrained individuals. It's possible, trained individuals may on average respond similarly to maintain a few reps in reserve and training to failure. But it's also possible they respond better to training to failure or even maintain a few reps in reserve. We unfortunately just don't know at this moment.
Something that is important I mention is that a lot of people underestimate the number of reps they can perform. In other words, many aren't good at judging how close they are to actual failure.
A 2017 study by Hackett et al. demonstrated this very idea.
81 adults with varying training experience, performed 5 sets on the chest press with 70%1RM and 5 sets on the leg press with 80% 1RM. With these loads on these exercises, you can typically perform 20 reps or less. During each set, participants were stopped at the 10th rep and asked how many further reps they think they could achieve. Then the participants immediately went back to performing reps to failure.
Looking at the results for the chest press, it's clear to see that participants underestimated the number of reps they could perform. For example, it appears that it was common for individuals to feel they could only perform 5 or 6 more when in actual fact they could perform 10 more. This was the same story for the leg press.
This is important as if you were to train with a few reps in reserve, you might underestimate the actual number of reps you left in reserve. Given this, it might be a good idea to occasionally train to failure, so you consistently remind yourself of how it feels to go to failure. thereby helping to keep you more accountable when you do leave reps in reserve.
The context of the particular exercise you are performing may also play a role in determining how close you train to failure.
With multi-joint exercises, such as squats and bench presses, maintaining correct form is integral to not only minimize the risk of injury but to also efficiently train the intended muscles. For some, especially beginners, taking multi-joint movements to failure can result in the breakdown of form, mainly due to fatigue causing a lack of concentration and awareness. Therefore, it may be a good idea to maintain a few reps in reserve with such movements.
With single-joint exercises, such as bicep curls and tricep skull crushers, there isn’t as much of a skill component with them. Therefore, fatigue is likely to have minimal effects on form (unless deliberate swinging or cheating is involved), and so training to failure is viable with such movements.
-
-
Music: Ruck P - A Tribe Called Tenz
-
References:
Комментарии