filmov
tv
5 Differences Between 'OLD MONEY' and Rich People
Показать описание
Today, we shall discuss a topic that has long been a source of fascination and intrigue for many — the differences between old money and the nouveau riche.
In the world of wealth and privilege, one’s social status is often defined by the source and history of one’s wealth.
With its deep roots and centuries-old legacies, old money has always held a certain mystique and allure, while the newly minted rich, often associated with flash and extravagance, can provoke both envy and disdain.
So, what are the key differences between these two worlds of wealth?
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 Introduction
0:49 Difference #1: Inheritance vs. Self-Made
4:02 Difference #2: Values and Lifestyle
6:55 Difference #3 Attitude Towards Money
9:36 Difference #4: Social Circles and Networks
11:08 Difference #5: Living Locations
------------------------------
The first difference between old money and the nouveau riche lies in the very origins of their wealth.
As the name suggests, old money is wealth passed down through generations, often in the form of inherited estates, trusts, and investments.
This form of wealth is deeply entrenched in history and often carries a sense of tradition and aristocratic privilege.
Think of the Rockefellers, the Astors, or the Rothschilds - families that have been wealthy for centuries, with wealth that has been preserved and multiplied through generations.
In contrast, the nouveau riche are often self-made, having amassed their fortunes through entrepreneurial ventures, technological innovations, or other means of hard work and determination.
This type of wealth can be both a source of pride and a point of contention, as the newly wealthy often face scrutiny and criticism from those who view their wealth as unearned or vulgar.
Let us remember that the line between old and new money can be fluid, with families crossing over from one category to another over time.
Indeed, families that were once considered nouveau riche can become firmly entrenched in the world of old money through the right mix of social connections, philanthropy, and cultural capital.
Take, for example, the Vanderbilts of New York, who in the late 19th century were regarded with suspicion and disdain by the old guard of New York society as they began building their lavish mansions and throwing extravagant parties.
Yet, over time, through strategic marriages, charitable giving, and cultural patronage, the Vanderbilts became accepted into the old money circle, with their wealth and social status firmly established for generations.
On the other hand, while not originally old money, the Kennedy family has also played the game of social climbing with remarkable success.
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., the patriarch of the Kennedy clan, made his fortune in bootlegging and other business ventures, hardly the stuff of aristocracy.
Yet through shrewd intermarriage with families such as Joseph himself marrying into the Cabot-Lodges and his son, future President John F. Kenndy, marrying into the Bouviers, as well as through political power (Joseph served as ambassador to the UK), the Kennedys have risen to the upper echelons of American society.
However, one cannot simply become 'old money' within one generation, no matter how powerful or wealthy someone is.
Examples of self-made millionaires and billionaires abound, from tech titans like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk to media moguls like Oprah Winfrey and The Kardashians.
Their wealth is often seen as a testament to their entrepreneurial ingenuity and drive rather than their family lineage or "taste."
In conclusion, the first key difference between old money and the nouveau riche lies in the origin of their wealth - one inherited, the other earned.
But as we have seen, the distinction between old and new money is not just a matter of wealth or lineage - it is also about values, lifestyle, and cultural capital.
In the world of wealth and privilege, one’s social status is often defined by the source and history of one’s wealth.
With its deep roots and centuries-old legacies, old money has always held a certain mystique and allure, while the newly minted rich, often associated with flash and extravagance, can provoke both envy and disdain.
So, what are the key differences between these two worlds of wealth?
------------------------------
------------------------------
------------------------------
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 Introduction
0:49 Difference #1: Inheritance vs. Self-Made
4:02 Difference #2: Values and Lifestyle
6:55 Difference #3 Attitude Towards Money
9:36 Difference #4: Social Circles and Networks
11:08 Difference #5: Living Locations
------------------------------
The first difference between old money and the nouveau riche lies in the very origins of their wealth.
As the name suggests, old money is wealth passed down through generations, often in the form of inherited estates, trusts, and investments.
This form of wealth is deeply entrenched in history and often carries a sense of tradition and aristocratic privilege.
Think of the Rockefellers, the Astors, or the Rothschilds - families that have been wealthy for centuries, with wealth that has been preserved and multiplied through generations.
In contrast, the nouveau riche are often self-made, having amassed their fortunes through entrepreneurial ventures, technological innovations, or other means of hard work and determination.
This type of wealth can be both a source of pride and a point of contention, as the newly wealthy often face scrutiny and criticism from those who view their wealth as unearned or vulgar.
Let us remember that the line between old and new money can be fluid, with families crossing over from one category to another over time.
Indeed, families that were once considered nouveau riche can become firmly entrenched in the world of old money through the right mix of social connections, philanthropy, and cultural capital.
Take, for example, the Vanderbilts of New York, who in the late 19th century were regarded with suspicion and disdain by the old guard of New York society as they began building their lavish mansions and throwing extravagant parties.
Yet, over time, through strategic marriages, charitable giving, and cultural patronage, the Vanderbilts became accepted into the old money circle, with their wealth and social status firmly established for generations.
On the other hand, while not originally old money, the Kennedy family has also played the game of social climbing with remarkable success.
Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., the patriarch of the Kennedy clan, made his fortune in bootlegging and other business ventures, hardly the stuff of aristocracy.
Yet through shrewd intermarriage with families such as Joseph himself marrying into the Cabot-Lodges and his son, future President John F. Kenndy, marrying into the Bouviers, as well as through political power (Joseph served as ambassador to the UK), the Kennedys have risen to the upper echelons of American society.
However, one cannot simply become 'old money' within one generation, no matter how powerful or wealthy someone is.
Examples of self-made millionaires and billionaires abound, from tech titans like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk to media moguls like Oprah Winfrey and The Kardashians.
Their wealth is often seen as a testament to their entrepreneurial ingenuity and drive rather than their family lineage or "taste."
In conclusion, the first key difference between old money and the nouveau riche lies in the origin of their wealth - one inherited, the other earned.
But as we have seen, the distinction between old and new money is not just a matter of wealth or lineage - it is also about values, lifestyle, and cultural capital.
Комментарии