FTDX10 vs IC-7300 CW Shootout CQWWDX CW Contest

preview_player
Показать описание
A comparison between the two radios during a contest.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The Icom bandpass filter is set to 300Hz (FIL3), not 500Hz like the Yaesu. Half of the video the Icom has the squelch closed, and it is clearly seen that you have the Icom Noise Reduction very high, to the maximum, in CW it is not recommended to exceed NR=3-4. The Yaesu AGC is in AUTO, and the ICOM is in FAST, this also influences the result, which should be practically identical, because the distance that separates these two transceivers in the Sherwood list is not possible to appreciate with the human ear. Greetings

Автор

Great video Scott! Very informative. I just purchased an FTDX-10 so I am watching YouTube videos to speed up my learning curve.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Paul
WQ4A

WQA
Автор

Ftdx10 is a much better cw rig - quieter receiver and 10x better noise reduction- has apf which the 7300 does not have… not even close with weak signals. With weak signals the 7300 does not keep up. In tight conditions the dx10 way more selective. I had the dx10 and it compares favorably to an ftdx5000mp and ftdx101mp. I’d recommend you check out videos from N4HNH for tips on how to run your dx10 to get the most out of it, but keep having fun in the process! Oh BTW dx10 much preferred on SSB as well with- superior NR and more audio tailoring- built in 3 band rx eq! Even the 101 does not have the rx eq. Icom not bad but dx10 excellent.

neoretrophoto
Автор

The DX10 audio sounds much better to me.

alanpfahler
Автор

Great video ! I’m considering buying the Icom 7300 so this was a good comparison. New subscriber as well. 73 W4ZTX North Alabama

DaydreamAboutNiceThings
Автор

Roofing! = bpf. Also make left/right comparison on yt. The only way to listen to the same signals

RoelandJansen
Автор

How you can decently compare receivers with the DNR in the circuit is a mistery to me.
I'm always surprized how difficult it seems to be to operate a receiver.

brunobeckers
Автор

At the beginning the 7300 had the squelch on, so the reception was degraded. Very similar receptions because clicks and phase noise of CW signals don't allow to hear the better results of the 10 measured in laboratory. The 7300 is general coverage when the 10 is not because its IF is inside the HF spectrum and the 7300 is not plagued with images rejection problems. 7300 is modern technology when 10 is sixties technology.

fdfzgeorges
Автор

The tuners on top of the speakers probably influence things. 73, K8AG

johnpawlicki
Автор

ICOM IC-7300 beats the yaesu hands down 💯👌

vkjajay
Автор

Faltou a tradução para língua, afinal ninguém é obrigado a saber essa lingua chata chamada "Ingles"...

jamilsouzagodoisouzagodoy