How Do You Weigh Things in Space?

preview_player
Показать описание
Astronauts need to know their mass while in orbit, but a normal scale would be free-falling around the Earth with them. So how do they measure their mass without gravity?

Hosted by: Michael Aranda
----------
----------
Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters: KSam Lutfi, Kevin Knupp, Nicholas Smith, Inerri, D.A. Noe, alexander wadsworth,
سلطان الخليفي, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Bella Nash, Charles Southerland, Bader AlGhamdi, James Harshaw, Patrick Merrithew, Patrick D. Ashmore, Candy, Tim Curwick, charles george, Saul, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Viraansh Bhanushali, Kevin Bealer, Philippe von Bergen, Chris Peters, Fatima Iqbal, Justin Lentz
----------
Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
----------
Sources:
----------
Images:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm using "spriginess" instead of spring constant from now on.

BEP
Автор

I like how you correctly mentioned the astronauts are not floating but are actually in free fall. So many people even scientist get that fact wrong from time to tome. Good on yah 👍

garypalmer
Автор

The title should have said. How to measure mass in space.

OdysseyWorks
Автор

Astronaut 1: How much do I weigh? I feel fat :(
Astronaut 2: No weigh! You matter.

Master_Therion
Автор

Thanks, Patreon patron Peter, for patronizing the Patreon. I too patronize the Patreon, becoming a Patreon patron, pledging a pittance compared to Peter the Patreon patron, so Patreon patron Peter takes priority for proposed ponderings!

I spent way too long working this out… :D

ExtraAmpersand
Автор

Space never ceases to be cool the more you learn about it

OneUpdateataTime
Автор

Cool I just learned a real-world application for the calculus subject I just finished. It was exactly what yall are talking about

TheStackeddeck
Автор

You'd think over time that spring would change in height due to compression and decompression, just like a spring on your vehicle's suspension.

electronicsNmore
Автор

learned about this in physics class, awesome

milky_wayan
Автор

Note to self: Apply to NASA for acronym thinker-upper job. Spring Loaded Universal Reciprocating Mass Equivalence Decider, or "SLURMED". First draft. Needs work.

JiveDadson
Автор

While they both register the same thing (oscillation frequency), if the U.S. solution uses a high-speed camera, it's not very elegant. All you need is an optical switch attached to a timer: when the beam is uninterrupted (because the plunger leaves on its out-bound path), the timer starts. When the beam is interrupted again (because the plunger returns from a full oscillation), it switches the timer off ... "precisely" measuring one oscillation without any human human error. I don't know how many oscillations the Russians measure, but attaching this kind of "on/off" measurement to a computer would let you record any number of oscillations without need for anything so sophisticated as a high-speed camera (or any need for human interpretation of the images). It would also be much easier to get micro-second accuracy than using a high-speed camera would.

danielbudney
Автор

Cmon and SLAMMD, and welcome to the JAMMD!

YourBuddyDinec
Автор

What about how scientists determine the mass and density of planets and other large bodies in space?

adlockhungry
Автор

Interesting, never thought about it, it is a smart way of doing it. Makes sense...

F=ma, F is the spring force, m is the mass of the astronaut, a is the acceleration of said mass.
F is an elastic force, so F=kx, where k is a known spring constant and x is the displacement of the end point of the spring to its equilibrium position, where F is 0.

plugging the second into the first equation:
kx = ma

k is known, x and a can be measured. In the end:
m = kx/a.

it is not that simple since they also have to subtract the friction force, but including it and some statistical mumbo jumbo later to get the average of the measurements over many oscillations and include errors, we get the m result! :)

minutegameplays
Автор

So instead of measuring the astronauts’ gravitational mass, it measures their inertial mass. Einstein saves the day again!

PumatSol
Автор

Well since space isn’t real, I guess we’ll never know.

zupmeoff
Автор

Fun Fact: The SLAMM algorithm that NASA developed for markerless tracking is the basis of most modern camera Augmented Reality systems like ARCore & ARKit

EvilKimau
Автор

But wait, do they need to keep a duplicate spring as a metrology standard for calibration? The one they use should eventually stray in accuracy as the metal fatigues from repeated use, right?

mixiekins
Автор

This sounds like the algebra I learned in school. useless to me. But a great presentation that I could fully understand.

GOD-help-us-all
Автор

I still want to know what space smells like.

SkyChady