Putin would lose a war against Nato in three days | Bill Browder

“Ukraine may be able to get the upper hand if they can start hitting military planning centres and fuel depots and, and weapons depots further into Russia.”

The only move Putin has left is to use nuclear weapons which would cause a “devastating conventional response from Nato” and the loss of India and China as allies, says Bill Browder.

Join this channel to get access to perks -

[drlarryjohnson]

This guy's analysis falls apart at the "Devastating conventional attack" on Russia by NATO if Russia uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine, part. That comment is as much a bluff, as anything Putin has said. What does he think a "devastating conventional" attack will elicit from a nation with more than 1000 Strategic ICBMs each holding maybe ten nuclear warheads on it? Do you think that "devastating conventional attack" by NATO will not elicit against America-UK, a punishing strategic nuclear attack? That's the gamble, isn't it? That's the bluff? You think Russia won't do that, because your response will be "We have nukes too." But if your bluff is called, and the West responds with what you call, "a devastating conventional attack" as Russian radar sees this "devastating attack" coming, and Russia gets off its strategic nukes (use them or lose them), then we will let fly our Western nukes. What's result of that? Russia will lose this war in 3 days. America would lose that war in 3 days; UK would lose it in 3 days. Because there won't be anything left to "win" of our two countries. You warmongers are nuts! What we need is a peace agreement to stop this war, not another way to get closer to unleashing Mushroom clouds and firestorms in our respective countries. Because Ukraine's case might be "existential" doesn't mean we have to make our case existential! Ukraine cannot "win" this war on the terms it wants. And the West can't win by forcing Russia into a corner.

[oberleutnant]

Russia would never fight a conventional war against Nato.

[flanker]

NATO barely did any damage to poorly equiped Serbian forces during 78 day long bombing campaign and tens of thousands of laser guided bombs fired from hundreds of best fighter jets and bombers… and they think they could do any better against modern Russian army…

[Samayil_]

Americans talking about mentally Disturbed leaders is hilarious 😂😂😂

[donrhine]

He’s already fighting a proxy war with nato. This war would have been over a long time ago if it wasn’t for nato support.

[kennedymatongo]

russia is not iraq or libya it has friends too very powerful friends

[gr]

This is how the US lost the war in Vietnam. They have not learned from the experience. Pathetic.

[shtBlock]

American general Milley said that Kiev would fall in 3 days. Yugoslavia didn't lose against NATO in 3 days. This is a joke.

[davereynolds]

in 3 days ? is Bill a military expert ? why follow anything this guy says ?

[randydawson]

Part of the agreement to get Ukraine to agree to give up their Nuclear Missiles under the 1994 Budapest Agreement was that Nato would help to protect them in the future, now they are being let down once again like the first time putin invaded Ukraine and took over Crimea. Thousands of lives and Billions of pounds could have been saved...Remember putin is watching all this...God Bless Ukraine from the UK.

[pm]

You cant be serious? The world would lose in 3 hours with Russia unleashing all its nukes!

[manovoid]

3 days huh? that's nice! May be they should try to go remove Taliban or something!

[TommyBaby]

Napoleon and the nazis didn’t have much luck in Russia. If I were nato and the west I would be leaving Russia well enough alone.

[wildhog]

Russia has a lot of money outside of Russia, this should be seized to rebuild Ukraine. You would not stop this war, but you'll prevent future wars.

[telumatramenti]

We would all "lose the war" "against NATO" in far shorter time than 3 days. I reckon roughly 30 minutes. How far is your shelter by the way?

[morbid]

Let's assume if Nato can defeat Russia in three days, that would leave Russia with only one choice and that's using the 6000 nukes that it possess.
What would Nato do then ? Counterstrike with nukes and everyone die in the end ?

[Stilicho]

This conflict will end when Ukraine and Russia agree to stop fighting. In the meantime NATO members can independently help either side. NATO was originally a defensive alliance, but in the 1990s it got involved in the former Yugoslavia, and this discussion today is about Ukraine. I myself do not want to see NATO boots-on-the-ground fighting for a non-member country. Untold death and destruction would follow.

[Dybbouk]

I think the truth is that the US is happy to see the war grind on

[primafacie]

Europe has the opportunity to not repeat the disastrous policy of appeasement in the 1930's by stopping the 21st murderous dictator invading other nations sooner rather than later. The USA has to continue and expand it's support and vote to keep Putin's American enabler out of the presidency in 2024.

[jimineycrickit]

Ukraine needs the aid promised to them.