Cessna 182 vs Cherokee 235

Cessna 182 vs Cherokee 235 #shorts
Check out full videos on each aircraft:

[davidgolden]

Love this idea for short comparisons! One thing though, looks like the journey time is 2 minutes longer for the 182 instead of 3 minutes shorter?

Anyway, love the channel!

[FencerPTS]

The graphic shows the Cherokee showing up 2 minutes earlier than the 182, but the green and the voice shows 3 minutes earlier for the 182... is there a mistake in the times?

[mafpw]

I’ve owned both. The Cherokee was better as a family station wagon. The Cessna is nice and roomy and easier to get in. Fuel burn is a little high for both of them for the speed you get. I’d much rather have an experimental these days without all the hassle getting very expensive parts. The Cherokee even used an old tin can as its brake fluid reservoir. I loved the manual flaps on the Cherokee over the electric with Cessna.

[buttonmonkey]

Good idea doing the comparisons, maybe you could do them regularly and always with a 300mile trip then we could do comparisons from other vids 😀👋🇬🇧

[mattym]

Some say the Piper Dakota 236 is the closer comparison.

[coasternut]

Cherokee for me. I don't really like high wings

[virgilio]

Yeah, buut, the 235 looks cooler because it has a low wing.

[matt_b...]

Oh he's doing battle royales now!

[wp]

Nice comparison, how about the C150 to the M20C on a 500 mile trip. My Mooney will burn 6.9GPH at 10K and doing 140knots.

[stonedzebra]

The 182 is just better sorry dont care what anyone says. Cessna makes the most beautiful small planes on the market.

[alfaranha]

Mas não troco o 182 pelo 235 de jeito nenhum!