Trinity refuted in 30 sec

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Tell me you don’t understand the Trinity without telling me you don’t understand the Trinity. 💀

MilesChristianus-txwd
Автор

Sam Shamoun already destroyed this argument..

Dragn
Автор

bro learned the trinity from mcdonalds bathroom

nguyenlethuy
Автор

Bro read the Bible... Jesus is God!!! SMH you literally just refuted, buried and destroyed your own argument 🤣

jugg_a_lw
Автор

I am Christian After watching dis i will be more Christian now ..

jesuslv-zpqn
Автор

They accuse us of insulting Jesus, but they don't realize that they are insulting God, the One that we and Jesus submit to.

strifelord
Автор

The Godhead do not depend on each other for their existence. Rather, the existence of the three persons is a result of God's willing himself to exist as three persons. This is a necessary act of God's nature, which results in the three persons of the Godhead and their respective processions.

Christi_Bellator
Автор

Many scholars over 2k years debate the issue.

Random bafoon: Well i can do it in 30 secinds

kishredbird
Автор

God does not need to come down on earth as human avatar to teach lessons. God is king. lord of the worlds. God send human prophets and messengers so they can teach us how to pray god and lives our lives and how to prepare ourselves for hereafter.

Soothingaquasound
Автор

The Father knows more than Jesus so clearly 1 is more powerful than the other and equality is thrown out the window.

gunnaway
Автор

Dude is always talking alone. I would like to see you debate some apologists.

tayedibesa
Автор

How to debunk 1 room of a house. Length, width, height=3 rooms right?🤔

OscarLopez-gism
Автор

So far no one knows the answer and I read all the 500 comments 😂😂😂😂😂

suleeqo
Автор

Don’t worry they will change it in the next update. Edit : reply to some idiots the Quran wasn’t changed it is 99.999% same as it was when it was revealed University of Birmingham has old Quran and it is the same way as it is right now and the uni is not a Muslim uni and the country uk isn’t a Muslim country so clearly they can’t be bias so it means Quran is the same and source : University of Birmingham

umerwaqar
Автор

This guy is about 1/10th of how smart he thinks he is. His flawed logic takes into account many assumptions that are just not true

jtmann
Автор

He created dependant and independent definitions and limited God to it.. bravo..

DelwinChowhan
Автор

This why its is written that "don't lean on your understanding" god capability and attributes is beyond a human can imagine

SirexGod
Автор

Muslims use 1+1+1
Christians use 1x1x1
Question answered 😎

SamLeoNav
Автор

It's a typical false dilemma fallacy that assumes that the Lord Yeshua is either 'independent' or 'dependent' on GOD the Father.
Such a fallacy, limits and leaves you with only two options, A or B, when in fact neither options are considered to be limitations of Christ!
The only two options it gives are:
1.If he's independent
Then there are two gods.
And
2. If he's dependent, then he's not god.
Completely ignoring the fact that the Lord Yeshua is not independent (John 10:30) nor is he currently dependent to GOD the father, since the father judges no one but depends on his word our Lord Yeshua for judgment, whom he calls and is also GOD:

John 5:22.
For the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son.

And as we all know, only GOD can judge (James 4:12)
That is why the first person of Trinity, the Father, calls the son 'GOD', because he is GOD:

Hebrews 1:8-9
But to the Son He says: 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; Therefore GOD, Your GOD, has anointed You With the oil of gladness more than Your companions.'

And it has been that way since the beginning, as it's also hinted in the old Testament.
Psalms 110:1
The Lord said to my Lord, 'Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool.'

edmundmichel
Автор

His “debunking” of the trinity was no where near as clever as he probably thinks it is.

fckickboxer