Who’s Winning the Trade War?

May.24 -- The U.S. and China are going toe-to-toe in their fight over trade. In one corner, President Donald Trump is swinging away with tariffs and blacklisting Huawei Technologies, and in the other, President Xi Jinping is promising retaliation from Beijing. So who’s winning? Bloomberg’s Dani Burger reports on “Bloomberg Daybreak: Europe.”

[sst]

Soon Guys Soon you will see everything will be so damn expensive in US

[afunguynamedkawhi]

I have to agree it's a pretty idiotic segment. Just shows how small minded the US is becoming.

[dailydata]

Putting factories in Cambodia and Vietnam is winning?

[MicroMacroTech]

God Bless America. GOD SPEED PRESIDENT TRUMP. defeat communism

[chfgbp]

Wrong question surely. No one could Tell at this stage. The side claiming victory IS the side feeling nervous.

[FortunePathVenerable]

In a trade war there’s no winners, the only loser are the customers lol.

[tomlin]

Well, I feel I am losing, I probably won't buy any unnecessary 'overpriced' product till this thing sets down.

[jasonlee]

Had the same Bloomberg analysts also done a report on America's win on the Vietnam war?

[HarsonoNg]

War has no winner, just who suffer the most.

[ismeeiger]

the only thing i know is we will avoid using services from US company if there is an alternative.

[pangtak]

It is not about trade deficit, its all about suppressing upcoming power.

[LongNguyen-bvll]

If possible, stay calm and "work together to make sense, to protect righteousness together". Having the same requirements or decisions that are suitable for both parties, rather than fighting and being hurt. Instead of living in a stressful mind, worry towards simplicity, calmness and alertness.

[tigerw]

China is losing for now till the A share moves up!

[asterisk]

The US has an overall trade deficit, with the China one the biggest component by far. At the end of the day, the trade deficit means that US consumers are getting more than they are actually producing. This is easy to solve: on average, US consumers just need to learn to make do with less. It's not like the USA can force other countries to consume more.

[zilun]

U.S. consumer price hike is a win for U.S. of A Americans don't pay more to China, they paid less. Price hike doesn't result in higher income to pay more overall, it result in buying less products but spending the same overall. Which means less import. Which means, of money Americans paid for Chinese goods, money supporting CCP is less than the past, and those "lesser amount" goes to Uncle Sam.

[NangongReng]

Lol.Are u playing hockey match? This is life and death issue, silly!

[ycs]

The people of US are losing but US gov are winning, for big companies the profit got lowered but they still making hell lot of profits from production in china.

[GLOBALALLIANCE]

What’s she doing? A play by play analysis of a five or perhaps 15 years long trade war?

[pgtan]

US overall trade deficits will forever be huge whether it buys from China, Vietnam or Timbaktoo. Why? Becos it's no longer economic to produce them inside US anymore.But, if the goods are from smaller countries, eg Vietnam, even better. U can be surethey'll be bullied more than China, although they did tried so hard w China. RememberToshiba when Japan was much smaller !

[ellengran]

US is he richest country in the world. Their problem has nothing to do with to little money.