CIVITAI BANNED STABLE DIFFUSION 3

Показать описание

Civitai just banned SD3, what is going on?

Sebastian Kamph

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

SD3 licensing is ridiculous. I'm not surprised CivitAI decided to ban it (temporarily)

dariusz.

Civitai decision is completely normal and i support it. SD3 licencing and model is horrible and it's not just that but they also deliberately destroyed the medium model on purpose which was publicly released and was intended to fail. Some of their best engineers already left SAI so i'm not sure what's going to happen next. Very bad moves, SAI.

BoyanOrion

not surprising. good for CivitAI. best place for pretty much everything. would not want them in some stupid lawfare. The worst part from what I understand is if any work is considered commercial, not only do you need a licence, but you must pay FOREVER for anything anywhere you ever produced! from models to images!

cyberprompt

Thank you Civitai, good move, from what I've seen so far is that the licencing is extreme. Definitely more information required.

potusuk

yeah good for them. the license for SD3 is insane and spooky. similar to the Unity fiasco last year, and now the Adobe fiasco. everybody say it again: giant techbro corporations are NOT your friend, even if they pretend to be long enough to get value from you. FOSS (free open source software) is what deserves our time. The value of these tools goes beyond any techbro corporation's desire for quick profits.

westingtyler

From what I've heard from some other AI YouTubers, there are some major issues with the wording of the license. If you use SD3 to create your own model, and you stop paying for your license, you are expected to destroy all copies of any derivative works (models, etc.). That is totally absurd for many creators. Olivio Sarikas did a breakdown of it the other day.

mattelder

Nothing has been blown out of proportion. The license is unreasonable. You can hardly even call it an open release

figs

From my limited experience with SD3, I'd say it looks like it will go the way of SD2, censorship and all. At the moment I'm not getting anything from SD3 that I can't create better in SDXL.

TheColonelJJ

Love it, that new CEO has to be fired from stability AI and some board members as well. It is easy to copy what Blender does, just open a donation platform, and I'm sure many of us will be donating, of course after they apologize and remove the dirt from the company.

adrianmunevar

It doesn't matter what opinions surround their license on its meaning or intent. Even if StabilityAI releases a statement saying it would only be used for xyz scenarios and such, it also doesn't matter. All that matters is what they can and can't do legally, and until the license is changed, what it can mean is what could legally be attempted.

omegahunter

👏👏👏

Clarification honestly means nothing without license changes.

Nocare

This is welcome. Stability will need to decide if they want the community or not. They can't have the community all tied up and caged.

ojikutu

I may not use AI anymore to make art, but Civitai is so real for this.

shadowdemonaer

100% with them. There is no way for CIVITAI to know if any outputs are properly licensed by the creators of the models and it can possibly let them in trouble for that for sharing the outputs. SAI need to make a clear and fair difference between their Enterprise API usage vs Open Source local use. If not the community will let this model rot like this others that had similar licensing problems.

baddealrage

Id only pay if it was perfected. Like 0 flaws, 100% on prompt and still uncensored and unlimited. That has value. But all these models even the new ones still have too many issues to be asking for anything.

TheCynicalNihilist