Review: Washington's War from GMT Games - The Players' Aid

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

My one piece of advice is next time shuffle the deck a bit more . :-)

markherman
Автор

I have not played this solo, but Stuka Joe has put up specific solo rules for his solo system on BGG

davidheath
Автор

Great review. I’m long to return to the hobby this is getting me in the mood. Thanks

eriknpf
Автор

You guys gotta give For the People a run. It's the US Civil War based on Mark Herman's Washington's War/We the People CDG War game.

TheWaveofbabies
Автор

Do you think it’s possible to play this game over Skype? Not sure with common card deck. Thx

jamesvaughan
Автор

I think you are missing the GMT player aid card. it has an abbreviated sequence of play. Those player aid cards you have are from BGG not GMT and they probably don't have the sequence of play because the GMT aid card did

SaxonChronicles
Автор

As  a fan of the game, that was a fun video to watch!  I have a few comments:

1) Regarding the drawing of four "War Ends" cards like you did... well it looks like Mark already commented on that, above! Seriously, I've never heard of it being an issue in all the years since the game has been out.


3) When you guys were rattling off other CDGs to be in your top three... am a little surprised that 'For The People' didn't spurt out instinctively!

4) Regarding your comment about playing the game solo, I'm sure you've heard of Stuka Joes' Solo CDG method? He's recently streamlined the system so is on version 2, now. The documentation can be found in the files library section for "Paths of Glory' on BGG.

5) At the very end, you said to expect a review of Washington's War to be posted [soon after this video]. Yet the title of this video says, "Review". So did you abandon the review attempt mentioned in this video to let this video be it? (I hope that makes sense!)

Anyway, this was a good video. Thanks!

bgm-
Автор

3:55 have you ever played 1775?


How does it compare (if you have)?

misomiso