Laplace Transforms: Partial Fractions (Imaginary Roots)

[hekk_tech]

my ears were bombarded with amplified cosine and sine waves thanks to the position of this guys microphone!

[YongWony]

Thank you for the video. May I suggest that you invest in a pop filter? You can also try talking to the side of the mic instead of directly at it.

[MarcoPeretto]

Thanks man, fix the mic a bit and the video is perfect!

[and.iswamkhize]

Was a bit lost @7:20, but then I understood it eventually. Thank you for breaking things down. You’ve made it a lot more easier to grasp the concept of using partial fractions to solve Laplace Transforms❤

[AJ-etvf]

Awesome example! Well-done and well -explained!

[thomashousley]

thank you for saving me from a 6-hour headache <3

[ck]

This is really helpful for my Vibrations and controls class, thanks.

[cameronharvey]

youre literally insane. craked out of your mind. GG's

[Bernoulli-szxf]

How did you get the s+2 in the numerator at (7:15)?

[binashbobby]

Can you go further how you came about the equation in 7:40?

[Broughtvulture]

Thanks man, I really like the Partial Fracitons method compared to using imaginary values and converting to time domain. Lovely video.

[TMan]

thanks buddy. Was searching a lot and trying hard, thanks a ton

[adaeji]

Why is there an s+2 in the numerator of B (7:15)

[futu]

This is the most helpful video on this topic by far. Thank you.

[zubaidahrusli]

Very helpful thanks! You guys who are complaining abt his mic. You guys shouldnt do that.. He is the one who give knowledge abt this and it is u guys who seek for his help (as u guys click his video).. You guys should matter the knowledge he wanted to share complaining abt his mic and so on. Its the value of the understanding that matters here not the mic or quality! Ppl nowadays ..

[fredlyraphael]

You did a very good job on explanation and choice of problems. I learned from this video

[zamp]

Thank you from Yonsei univ south korea.

[h.k]

And at 7.20. When he divides the numerator into two terms, how? Like how does he decide that, term A as 1 as a numerator, and term B has (s+2) as a numerator. This is exacly the same thing that profs. do! Whats the point of making an explanation, when the explanation is "there are a number of ways of doing xyz, i have chosen y" and then not explain what methods xyz are, and why method y is chosen or generally good or prefered in that situation. Somebody, @LearnChemE teach me teach'

[yarenkaya]

Fully informative practice
Thank you, sir

[zachd]

Thank you! you made this very plain and simple to understand :)