The Philosophy of Liberty (Mirrored)

the best explanation ive ever seen on the topic. this is a mirrored video. there are a couple versions of this on youtube that are either low quality or half of the information is cropped out so you can't see all of the words in their entirety. beautiful video. please share.

[tooge]

Excellent presentation !
It's a shame such fundamental principles, something some of us clearly understand, have to be taught to most Amerkans.

[brettolson]

This is the video that turned me into a Libertarian.

[DVincentW]

James Freeman shared thanks for this. Been subbed since way back.

[shadfurman]

Thank god. Now I can stop fretting about me never making this video and I can just share it.

[korbyn]

Senator Mike Green in Michigan has introduced a bill to eliminate Pistol Free Zones from the list of prohibited places to carry a firearm. You must pay a $20 exemption fee and are not allowed to carry openly in those places. This is a step forward for Michigan carry rights! It is Senate bill 0442 and is currently in the Judiciary Committee.

[SeanRyno]

Would have liked the video more with narration instead of background music.

[MrEarthling]

Succinct, to the point and utterly irrefutable.

[joseiriarte]

What your are doing is great, make accountable of their offered service, From a comment below, I wrote this.-

I find out Libertarians also have some flaws on their phylosophy, can be as authoritarians when they want others agree to their views, style or wishfullness of freedom; example, they want more freedom to create wealth, lower taxes, less regulations, but only their solutions are the working ones. However, no every country is prepared for it. They shun gov. rules and regulations, but they want the best service they can obtain for a penny given, in order to get their property respected. Freedom is not freedom if it attemps on the liberty of others, and libertarians are not saints, sometimes they commit wrongdoing or they get utilized by groups. Example, they want everybody to be responsable from their own safety, health and goods, plus everyone should be able to choose the provider that gives them the best service. Buy many a times the provider may incurr in slavery practice, fraud, deceiving other out of ther goods through planned double edge language, in order to compete in the industry where there are another buch of hungry dare-to-anything money makers. And just there they claim gov or police should, or will be there to stop it from happening. So they want less weight for more quality, and there comes the DILEMMA, up to what extent is any behavior good or allowed, who will make those rules, and why no this other group, where is the thin line that makes the starting point of ilegal behavior appear faily ok. If you are going to buy land, how much is the max possible even though you may, because the land belongs to the goverment, which at the same time, government belongs to the people that comform, finance and ratifies its existence.

Where there is society, there is always the risk of people thinking different, and of course having different wants conficting in a group create chaos, Ups!! there comes rules. Corruption may as well be a practice of libertarianism, avoiding taxes, lobbying in-favor rules and regulations, and thieving other group of people out of their belongings. And there comes another issue, public institutions, which they think suck, and even though libertarians may be right in some aspects, they call for the right to choose where to be treated of any sickness, also where to get schooled at, infrastructre financed by privates which in turn they could inflate and hit the poorest . They assume everybody will start at the same point, everyone will relate to their values or motives, everyone will want and demand more freedom, when sometimes, they only want the minimal service. Being in implicite agreement of nation, demans understanding that there is a need of rules and regulations to keep the weel safelly turning, and how much or how many rules and regulations will depend on the current status of the nation, being economy and education of its members.

[LiberLam]

The fundamental issue with this is that its deontological. This deontological maneuver allows something like the term "liberty" to be subsumed into phenomenological interface itself. "Now" is only fixed in time, space, identity, mental formation, and cause when one reduces such into a necessity. My point is not to drag you down with philosophical rhetoric, but to suggest that a greater freedom may exist apart from articulation and mental formation; needing no producing in mind. Description is inadequate in pointing this out, but breaking off from rigid philosophy is something that can help to open the gate to subtle modes of being. I think the important factor is recognizing current modes as crude and responsible for the dissatisfaction experienced within them

[underduress]

This philosophy has one major flaw in the beginning. People do own their children and children do not and cannot be the decision makers for themselves until they enter adulthood. And there is such thing as "indentured servitude" which people do ignorantly enter into and many see herded into

[heartsky]

Sorry to have discovered your channel so late, missed the party, you don't seem to be around here any more.

[DVincentW]

Intellectual sloth is rampant in today's society.

[emmashipe]

This all seems kind of obvious but also extremely vague in a way. "two people who exchange property are both better off or they wouldn't do it" - That's just stupid. What if they made a bet or someone just felt like being nice and exchanging property with someone even though they don't necessarily care for what they're getting in exchange. There are a few exceptions to this statement.
Also the fact that you use a lot of subjective terms to describe people - like good and evil. Who I think of as a good person or an evil person could be completely different from yours.
I just don't find this video that enlightening.

[asapketo]

I agree with this philosophy for the most part, however, what we all want is EQUAL opportunities and UNEQUAL outcomes... that is a meritocracy. To ensure equal opportunities, there must be one rule... Wealth cannot be transferred to the next generation through inheritance. There must be a 100% inheritance tax with the money reinvested back into society likely eliminating the need for any other tax collection methods