Are BIGFOOT sightings REAL?

Bob Gimley took the iconic “Bigfoot” video. But is he a hoaxer? Let’s listen to a recent interview to find out.

► DISCLAIMER: This channel does not promote or encourage any illegal activities. All content provided by this channel is meant for educational purposes only.

► FAIR USE DISCLAIMER: Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made “Fair Use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair Use is a use permitted by copyright statute that otherwise might be infringing.

#bigfoot #paranormal #hoax

[DANFORTHPAPE]

There have been a lot of analyses of the film by biological experts over the years. Slowed footage shows the huge muscle mass shaking as it walked, it had very long strides that are longer than what is humanly possible, and the 'animal' swings briefly to look at them and as it does so its breasts swing (showing it to be a female). The animal clearly also has a very broad body width, and it was agreed by experts to be virtually impossible to fake a body suit that looked like a real big animal.

[doncavanagh]

He just gave it away right there “ we created “ that’s an admission of the hoax

[zwxq]

Just found this channel, became incredibly interested in the psychology behind obvious signs.
I've developed an open mindset so I always assume every story presented to me as being real.

You do a really good job explaining the science behind the hoax phenomenon. Fascinating.
Subscribed.

Also please complete the analysis of Bob Lazar

[kathleenkline]

Came to this channel after hearing Pat Brown mention it and am very interested in what you have to say. On this one however, the fact that there is a film that no one has been able to refute is a huge factor here. Not sure when this interview was done, but presumably it was decades after the event and he has been interviewed on it countless times. Isn't it possible that some of what you attribute to red flags, i.e. lack of emotion, are just the result of time and retelling the story so many times?

[jcqlnr]

There's a guy named Bob Heironimous (doubt I spelled that right) that claims he was the guy wearing the bigfoot suit in the Patterson Gimlin film. There's videos on Youtube of him talking about it. I'd love to see you analyse his statements about that.

[ruthann]

Just found your channel and I am power watching! Are you familiar with the West Memphis Three? I would love to hear your thoughts! Thank you!

[lanazak]

Please do one on Neil Armstrong discussing the moon landing. He sounded like an disinterested textbook instead of a somewhat thrilled (like most humans would be) eyewitness.

[bestestname]

Sounds like Bob was watching Rodger more than the "Bigfoot". Kinda weird I wouldn't have taken my eyes off it for a second, think about it.

[ErikTheCueist]

You should do an episode on Travis Walton

[Canary-qy]

I can't believe this guy couldn't come up with a better story than this. I grew up in the Kentucky hills and i remember a neighbor boy telling me that a bigfoot came to the door of his grandma's trailer and she shooed the bigfoot away with a broom.

[dominikcernelic]

Looks like a cover-up story for a brokeback mountain type scenario.

[lizgander]

Are you suggesting this might have been a month long Brokeback Mountain kind of camping trip?? 😂😂😂 Yea, his wife might have been suspicious if he didn’t come back with a Bigfoot sighting 😂

[okster]

Great analysis of Gimlin, still doesnt change the fact they couldn't make a gorilla suit that sophisticated in the 60s and still cant now. Ntm even if they did, why make it female

[bud]

It's a bummer you didn't watch the P&G footage before making this. It's a film not a photo. He says she because it has breasts. Love your videos and I respect your opinion but I think you got this one wrong. The P&G film was shot in 1967 and it's still considered some of the best evidence of Bigfoots existence. Muscle movement under the skin, limb, torso and joint proportions, and the mechanics of her movement are the things that convinced me. Keep making awesome videos! Take care.

[tugbankert]

DD, I have been binging your videos while I detail cars. The benefit has been that when one of my sons starts to tell me a story, I have been able to instantly detect deception. All of these red flags kept going up, and it was super amazing, and I called him out...in a loving, fatherly way, of course.

[kevindrew]

14:19 "I can't speak for Roger" dude you just spent two minutes doing exactly that, you even told us what Roger was thinking and worrying about.

[TerminalM]

I would have the HARDEST time carrying just a casual conversation with you. Even though I know I'm being genuine and honest I would be constantly thinking you're in full analyzing mode and would mess my head up bad.

[legendary.super.shannon]

@00:22 _"Bob Gimlan, who alleges to have a picture of a bigfoot..."_

He doesn't
_✌🏻allege✌🏻_ to have a _"picture"_ of a sasquatch, he *_has_* a professionally fimed full-on video, originally shot for a nature documentary, where he stumbled upon an unknown creature, was lucky enough to catch it on film, which depicts the very 1st sightings of an American sasquatch ever captured on film. It's famously known as the _"Patterson & Gimlan footage"._ There've been many others captured on film since then, but so far this remains the clearest, most interesting pieces of video to ever exist, which shows a full-body shot of a bi-pedal man-like ape walking upright w/its back turned to the camera, looking back several times, for a solid 30 to 60 seconds.

@03:50 _"he could've seen a deer, or a Buffalo..."_

Bro, again, there's *video footage* of the creature he's referring to 🤷🏼 Did you research this at-all? It couldn't have been those things, because if you have eyes & can see, you can watch the footage yourself... It's clearly not any of those things you listed.🤨 How on earth could it be _"made up"_ when there's a literal video...?

I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt & say you aren't completely brain-dead *(Edit:* upon further review, i was mistaken...), so i guess you're implying it was a hoax perpetrated guy in a gorilla-suit? Because you should probly mention/be aware of the fact that the footage has been endlessly analyzed by experts (much more qualified & thorough than yourself) in video-editing, special-effects, anatomy, biology - most notably by M.K. Davis. & Then you have guys like _Bigfoot Tony, ThinkerThunker, Bob Gymlan_ (no relation) here on YT, & it's been proven based on comparing the specific, apparent structure of human bodies, we are all composed of the same overall structure, no matter your height or weight - your bones, joints, muscle structure etc. will fit w/every other human on the planet when compared. When examining & comparing Patty (which is the moniker applied to creature depicted in their footage) the length of the arms, the placement of the hips, knees, & joints are completely different, which given the limitations of the era this took-place, make it impossible that it's just a man w/a big hairy rack in a suit. Much more intelligent & thoughtful people have broken down every single frame of this video, & it's yet to be disproven, & as a result, the more That's uncovered w/modern technology have only *added* to its credibility. What are _your_ qualifications again...?

@21:54 _"I dont know anything about the guy..."_

Obviously. Seeing as you think it's a photo they're referring to... You talk about
_✌🏻leakage✌🏻_ while Analyzing every word of a man in his late-70s, talking about something that happened 50+ yrs ago - you ever consider his details & memory could be somewhat skewed or fuzzy...? I guess that's impossible, as you're pretty confident in calling him a liar numerous times throughout.🙄 He's passed multiple polygraphs as well, just fyi.

@35:15 _"Is he claiming it's a female. That's strange, he refers to it as 'her'..."_

Bro, this is well-known, easily verifiable information you should already be aware of. The creature they filmed has very obvious visible breasts, which is why they say it's a female... There's even specific frames that possibly suggests there may've been a child clinging to her fur in the video as-well. It's extraordinary difficult to say for sure, given it's totally camouflaged & this footage was shot in the 70s (therfore low frame-rate & resolution).

So, just so we're clear; You... You haven't even watched the footage, have you...? 🤣 Wow. Brother -this could possibly be- *This **_is_** the* laziest, least researched, most garbage _✌🏻analysis✌🏻_ I think I've ever f'n seen. I *_WAS_* enjoying a few of your videos prior to this 1, but this is straight-up nonsense. Why would anyone lie about this? You think there's a ton of money in the bigfoot hoax game? Because there's no money in it. The opposite in fact. There may've been an exchange or 2 when they were showing the footage in theaters, but nothing life-changing nor long-term. Now he's just an old man, & all he gets now is endless scrutiny from oblivious know-it-alls like yourself. His story has never changed over the years, & many others have gone back to the site over the years & recorded inhumanly loud, drawn out howls & witnessed strange happenings all throughout the area, to this day. There are still many reports from locals claiming they've seen them, as-well as hours of footage possibly depicting them. Everything you point out your so-called _"analization"_ is just so weak, low frequency, void of rational thought, & it's all completely misunderstood conjecture on your part. I honestly don't understand how you could possibly suggest this is _"proof"_ of anything. I mean, the arrogance 1 would need to make the claim that *you've* _✌🏻debunked✌🏻_ *the* _Patterson/Gimlan footage, _ based on a single interview w/an elderly man, while you're also completely oblivious to the existence of the most infamous footage of a cryptid ever captured, you're very clearly biased, stating that you've _"never been wrong so-far"_ which is nothing short of laughable. I can't watch anymore of this, so i'll just say have a great day. I award you no points, & may G0d have mercy on your soul. ✌🏻🐵

[onethreeify]

48:44 i actually laughed out loud here while i was cooking and listening to this part. in just a handful of videos over this weekend alone, you've taught me a million lessons in statement analysis, and rule number one seems to be "unncessary details are lies". and in 50 minutes of analysis you've cracked that the biggest and best (and only) evidence for bigfoot that exists was really two guys drinking beer in the woods for a month and fearing what their wives would say. and the very first thing that comes out of bob's mouth when you start rolling again is: "she was 7 foot 3 and 3 quarters inches tall."

p.s. i'm still undecided on whether or not how much you've helped me with all of your videos is payment enough for destroying bigfoot for me.

[jessalou]

I’m only a few mins in and the guy said “there one stood”
This is typical language for country boys. My stepdad sounded just like this when he spoke…