What’s Left of AI After Hype?

Why are hundreds of millions of dollars being invested in AI startups?
What does geopolitics and technological sovereignty have to do with it?
Has ChatGPT really evolved?
Why is Nvidia valued at $3 trillion?
How many people have already lost their jobs because of AI?
Should we be worried about a potential catastrophe?

===========================================

===========================================

===========================================

Navigation:
00:00 – Technological Revolution
04:43 – The Problem Isn't Just Memes
11:32 – The Evolution of the Child
15:19 – Why Nvidia's CEO Signs Breast Autographs
20:28 – Who's Actually Using This?
24:40 – It's Getting Smarter, My Lord
28:00 – When Will They Replace All the Humans?

#economics #technology #politics #ai #chatgpt #startups #usa #europe #china

[TheResearcherYT]

Check out our video on how countries are competing in another technological field – space:

[matrixpredator]

benefit to whole humanity? nope
free for all? nope
making money for greedy companies? yep

[blengi]

Putin talks about Sovereignty, while cosplaying in a anglo saxon suit and tie like he's the world's biggest fan girl of western originated modernity lol

[Ultravenom]

"AI" is spending tons of energy to perform jobs that simple algorithms can already perform better. It is honestly crazy how anyone believes these low efficiency machines are going to change the world.

[RaedanWulfe]

It's criminal that this channel is still so small. De heck youtube algorithm, do better.

[compaqmpplayer]

It’s a crime these videos don’t have more views.

[johndinsdale]

Hang on the EU banned Larna 3.2 open source models so I guess it 'not developed here syndrome?

[johnl.]

With rapidly aging (need alot more people caring for them) and declining populations around the developed (plus China…..) world. AI taking jobs will not be an issue.

[holdthetruthhostage]

It has started a Revolution that once it hits open source & can run a PC on Autopilot it will revolutionize affordable independent development

[ionutsj]

34:19 "we wouldn't have been able to make them without generative AI". We could make them without AI. We have the option to hire human artists/editors to make them.

[IntellectCorner]

*𝓣𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓼 𝓫𝔂 𝓘𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓒𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓻*

0:01 - OpenAI's Rise and the AI Revolution
5:17 - Technological Sovereignty and the Global AI Race
8:38 - Mistral: A European ChatGPT
11:59 - The Evolution of ChatGPT and Theory of Mind
13:11 - The Power of Parameters
15:37 - NVIDIA's Rise and the Importance of Computing Power
20:47 - ChatGPT's Diagnostic Capabilities
23:03 - AI's Impact on Jobs and Productivity
24:56 - Context Windows and AI's Understanding
27:24 - AI in Healthcare and Its Potential
29:09 - AI's Potential for Disinformation and Manipulation
30:40 - The Hype and Reality of AI Implementation

[Daniel-bny]

Brilliant! Thank you from Oslo, Norway.

[vlarion]

I've got a theory as to how the AI system will develop, and it will look almost like how feudalism unraveled. So first in the beginning, when the AIs are highly restricted, only the people of the lower-classes will be replaced, but as we all know, states and companies COMPETE TO SURVIVE and so they start REMOVING the different restrictions since the more restrictions, the less the power of that AI, and vice versa. The first entities (states and companies) to do so will gain a MASSIVE ADVANTAGE over the others simply because of AIs superintelligent nature. Then when others realize what's going on they will throw the rules in the bin and start removing restrictions on their system. Here, I'll refer back to how feudalism was destroyed in Europe and China during this time. In order to compete with fellow lords, the massive estate owners (kings and dukes) began to employ people not necessarily from the noble class and instead adopted MERITOCRACY as a means to keep their estate competitive, and so, the lower class nobles got essentially ELIMINATED and gave way to talented commoners, then the system unravels further as people in the higher positions also gets replaced because of the state's needs, and by the turn of the 20th century, the only lords that still have power are the emperors and kings of Europe, which after WW1, the absolute ones all disappeared in place for republics and constitutional monarchies. Now, we simply replace those talented commoners with AIs and replace the lords and estate owners with us humans and we get something eerily similar.

The solution of this problem is not to fight against the AIs but to make us into such a scenario where we can exist like the English nobility and monarchy where we can still keep our estates and instead leave the management to the AIs, because let's be honest, when their IQ is exponentially higher than ours, resistance is going to be futile. Fighting against the AIs would be like how the French nobility resisted and ended up getting executed to make way for the republic, which when you are the noble, is not very smart.

[GhostOnTheHalfShell]

Gimme my fix, just one more fix and the world will be better!

[normandduern]

Nice discussion. One quibble: the bit about the AI ‘realizing’ that it was being tested when asked about pizza toppings. Taken literally that would of course imply that the AI was somehow conscious, as ‘realizing’ anything is a quality of consciousness. I suggest an alternative explanation: the human programmers who designed this thing realized that someone would attempt to test it, and programmed it to respond to a clearly anomalous request like this one with the ‘This seems like a test’ response. A very neat and clever parlour trick, but nothing more.
It reminds of a 1970’s (I think) similar bit of hocus-pocus in which an AI had a ‘conversation’ with humans through a computer in which the AI responded to any question it couldn’t answer with another, defensive, question – which the programmers presented as an AI successfully imitating a severely paranoid human. I believe I first read about that in ‘Human Reason and Computer Power’ (1976) by Joseph Weizenbaum, still relevant. Quite a few people actually bought that hustle back then (Carl Sagan being one of them).

[andanssas]

Great presentation on the AI bosses. Now please research the AI piggybackers, like Poe (multi-model responses), Perplexity (real sources links) or Phind (free for devs, unlike copilot and cursor), will they have a chance against the final boss? 😂

[theconqueringram]

Sometimes I think technology is advancing faster than we humans can comprehend.

[GoronCityOfficial]

Don't beat yourself up or get mad about people being mad you use AI. AI is the future as you have laid out, generative AI is a tool, we have to use it, we have to adapt to it

[SimGunther]

With their realization that Ay Eyes are smarter than executive bloat, we'll end up in a Dune situation where this tech is removed entirely and we'll be left fending for scraps because the same executive bloat took everything valuable by force and abandoned Earth.

[tibiamademedoit]

There are some inaccuracies in here but also some minor.. off things. For exmaple elon as far as i know does ai via his other companies and is not at all involved in open ai for years. This is not fearmongering but its clearly not unbaiasd