Klee Irwin - The Quasicrystalline Nature of Consciousness In the Universe

preview_player
Показать описание

Klee Irwin's presentation from The Science of Consciousness conference (slightly modified for general audiences) in April, 2016.

Klee is the director of Quantum Gravity Research, a Los Angeles-based group of theoretical physicists working to discover a new quantum gravity theory, or a first principle theory of everything.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm so glad that QGR exists. I strongly believe this group will successfully achieve the Theory of Everything and that will open up the door to a new level of Human Consciousness and awareness, the likes of which mankind has never seen.

TendoTheDude
Автор

Rooting for the QGR team! Hopefully your research opens up a new scientific way of understanding consciousness and our physical reality. Youre opening the doors for the new generation of scientists

candelariast.patrick
Автор

I’m very happy to have discovered your work.. aside from my own experience of life, it is the ultimate validation of my own personal understanding of ‘how everything works’.. It makes me feel much better knowing that there are already people in the world working hard to scientifically legitimize the truth.. I’ll be following your work closely. Thanks again.

matthaney
Автор

梦开始的地方
the begining of Stroies, the great idea to understand everything

晚风故事
Автор

I have two questions

1- how entropy works or changes in quasicrystals ?

because i noticed that there are entropy units in black hole so what does that means

2- how could you describe the geometric structure for example a electron by the ( dynamic animation ) that you showed us

خالدالعيد-قذ
Автор

This is awesome. I know exactly what is missing from their ideas. My 2003 book basically says this same theory. I have been developing those core ideas and transcending them ever since. I know why the Golden ratio is important. All the concepts and paradoxes I thought of in my background in neuroscience, psychology, languages, computers, cultures, memes, and evolution are relevant. It’s frustrating that I do not have a direct voice or career, because every time I come up with an idea or set of ideas like the paradox of what we see in neuroscience vs what we see in both psychology or experience which some years later was named the “Binding Problem” for example, eventually is named and recognized. There is no doubt that I am on the right path and I know exactly what to do and where to look. I see clearly what is missing in this theory too. It’s beyond beautiful and I love it, it’s just not the whole picture. ❤️❤️❤️❤️ I rate this 4 hearts!!

spiralsun
Автор

Yes life is energy towards information is the fuel of life

GearsinMotionGraphics
Автор

Keep your eyes peeled for our new E8 documentary - coming soon!

QuantumGravityResearch
Автор

Nice video guys, thank you for sharing your knowledge with us.

virusoiul
Автор

Por definición, si A1, A2, A3, … An, son elementos de una sucesión de Fibonacci entonces Ar + Ar+1 = Ar+2. Considerando que el concepto de “sucesión” involucra a un “antes” y un “después”, observamos que al generalizar tal concepto para una sucesión de Fibonacci tenemos que: Pasado + Presente = Futuro.
¿Representa la Relación Aurea un óptimo para la tasa evolutiva?

guillermobrand
Автор

So what kind of experiment could test this theory? What predictions can it make?

LeviConquersAll
Автор

Would there be then something like the conservation of consiousness? Regarding to if something can happen it will happen over time, does this also mean that if something has happened it will happen again?

rdrumk
Автор

I looked up drawing dimensions. It's connecting the lines between a doubling of points where one point is 0 dimensions, 2 points gives a one dimensional line, four a 2-d square, 8 a 3-d cube, 16 a 4-d whatcha macallit etc. to the 8-dimensional which I'm not sure if that gives the quasi chrystal you refer to. Y'all seem to be on to something though so I'm going to continue to investigate as part of my journey to attempt to help in the creation of a self sustaining ZPE Vortex which I believe is the key to our evolution and makes my life interesting in any case. 🤓

imaginaryuniverse
Автор

I think it's fantastic ! And best wishes to you ! And a lot of the major scientific discoveries over the years are due to people who think outside the box !

MadderMel
Автор

To be consciously emergent in YouTube media stream, it would be progressive to put the video under creative commons licensing.

I am very happy that there are people who are like minded sharing our present state of being. I am willing to help explore possibilities for the tremendous amount of healing our species, and home, desperately need. Like the microscopic fields making macroscopic fields in ordered phases of magnitude, this often takes what we perceive as a long time. This is the nature of life we are part of. When we reflect in self awareness, we soon might come to a point were we realise we are all the same, expressing different geometries of self realization. The feed back loop as stated in the video.

In the actions my words and in the words my being. Thought into form is conscious energy. 😉

consciousenergies
Автор

Thank you for your essential exploration. Given the seven clues noted along with quantum entanglement, does it follow that due to our many interactions over an average life with other conscious beings that our consciousness persists in some form after physiological expiration as a result? Moreover, could some amount of information garnered over a lifetime survive the postulated survival of consciousness?

ahrmiller
Автор

I have made a discovery involving the fibonacci sequence in radial geometry that I think relates to this. I know that this is a rediscovery of something that once was known, and I'm not sure if it is still understood, even by the group that once must have known of it. I can't see (exactly) how yet, but it must relate to your work.

chrisbova
Автор

Computational Geometry of Space/Time

The glass onion is a model of the probability space where the tree of
the knowledge (our material reality) is growing, each layer gets
progressively thinner, so that, like a fractal it never completely fills
space, the space is not infinite. The boundary conditions display edge
of criticality in each layer, at each iteration. The physical
manifestation (the structure of our reality), could be thought of as a
tree like structure, growing in this probability space. At the ends, the
filaments are very fine, in fact infinitely fine. All of the
information is stored as relationships and as the finest projections are
created or computed you have the greatest number of possible outcomes,
so that the earliest versions of this structure had few possible
outcomes (less degrees of freedom). This structure could be called truth
at it's core (in the beginning) and chaos in the fine hair-like
projections (the end). This could also be described as making perfect
sense in the beginning and being complete nonsense at the end. The ever
present now, is our position in the computational geometry. Aspects of
this geometry include, Buridan's ass, deception, metastability,
dithering or self referential randomness. Fredkin's paradox would
describe the degrees of freedom at each boundary condition or iteration.

RickDelmonico
Автор

The E8 symmetry group is the unification of Charges, not spin or other observables. Therefore, the claim at 8:40 is false.

StephenPaulKing
Автор

Reality as a self-generating network. Nice!

StephenPaulKing