Su-57 5th generation fighter jet | How it Works #jets #fighterjet #planes

Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video.

During registration use the code BRAVO to get some exclusive rewards.

This video was made in Blender.

This is the 5th generation Sukoi 57 or some called this the T 50 pak fighter jet which is a Russian internal designation.
What is a 5th-generation fighter jet?
On paper, the Russian Engineers define a fifth generation fighter jet as
One that can do all of these.
Go 80 p% supersonic cruise without using afterburner.

It should Have Stealth or Low-probability-of-intercept radar.
It should have A high degree of maneuverability to counter Air to air combat.

Advanced avionics systems and Network or data fusion capabilities to track 100 targets and engage more than 10 targets.

The 5th gen aircraft should be able to carry a number of projectiles in the Internal Weapon bay as well as an auto cannon.

and last but not the least it should be able to land and take off on short Runways.

Find us on Facebook

Support us in Buy Me a Coffee

Instagram

Twitter

We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe

Peace Out

As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.

Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)

This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers.

[Aitelly]

Thank you World of Warships for sponsoring this video.

During registration use the code BRAVO to get some exclusive rewards.

[Brian-qjkk]

You forgot to mention that the Su57 has 2 types of radar, on the nose for the X-band radar, on the wing for the L-band radar. l band radar is very effective for detecting stealth aircraft.

[faris.Djunaidi]

No politic, just admire the engineering. Btw, some of your explanations are not accurate. For example, that's not how cobra pughachev maneuver work, etc

[keysersoze_]

The wing loading is same for both F22 and Su-57. It is rated at +9/-3 Gs.

[eky]

One of few or maybe only channel that has most detailed explanation of every component shown on 3D model. Pros/cons regardless of origin country. Quality informative content!

[Issavibe]

A lotta people would be more and better informed if there was more unbiased videos like this, just learning the best engineering from both sides

[novosib]

man this is so cool, no politics, no hate or sarcasm. Just information and 3D images.
Here in Australia they are saying the F35 is a bad investment due to its extremely overcomplicated software.

[keith]

It's so refreshing to see a video talk facts and keep its biases to itself.

[agentepolaris]

I simply adore the sound this makes when flying, it's a scary yet really awesome sound

[NotnSaturn]

Your videos only get more and more informative and better with each one! Keep it up aitelly

[MrZlocktar]

Russia have a very different mindset about aviation and how it suppose to perform, and especially about this fuss about stealth in general. So engineers are not fixed on idea of stealth by any cost (like you would pay for stealth by limiting thrust vectors on F-22), but rather compromising on stealth capability to have unmatched maneuverability instead. That mean, the Su-57 is about as stealth as it can be, but only if you scan it by radar from front or from side. It's RCS is just the same as it is with F-22 or F-35, no difference there. However, if you look at RCS from a rear.. In this case it's only more stealthy than any current gen 4 or gen 4+ jet, but definitely not on F-22 territory.

So if you scan it front or side - it's F-22 or F-35, but if you scan it from rear where engines are, then it is a different story. This compromise resulted in a very unique and so far unmatched decision that helps to compensate for bigger RCS from rear, which is not common to what is considered to be 5 gen fighter.

Which is why it's the first fighter to mount a DIRCM system, with one turret mounted behind the canopy and another mounted under the cockpit providing jet with yet another layer of protection to compensate for rear RCS. If opposing radar would detect engine signature from rear this layer of protection will give it additional edge and combined with extra maneuverability and ability to change thrust vectoring on fly, it suppose to effectively mitigate the threat because once jet is turned forward and flying backward, the missile can't lock onto it anymore and IRST and DIRCM only making it worse for missile trying to find it's signature and for radar to keep it.

However, there is more to it. There was another reasoning behind it, and it's because Russia believes that stealth technology will not live for long because radars are much more ahead of their time already, and it's going to be even more effective with years with new weapons as well. Since Russia can't afford just wasting money to create a dedicated stealth jet because it is inevitably will be obsolete later, they instead created jet that can withstand time, in order so there wouldn't be any need to create new jet to compensate for it. This fighter will be effective as it is at least 2 generations. Even when stealth will no longer be effective and radar technology will nullify it's use, this fighter jet will be ready for it with DIRCM and unmatched maneuverability while others would need to create completely new designs to keep up with time. Most likely mirroring the design of Su-57 and especially DIRCM capability.

Essentially it's one jet for 2 generations ahead without any need to waste more money on new one later. Ingenious decision.

Peak engineering. I am a big fan of this beauty.

[GeeLove]

What I always liked about Russian Aircraft is the control stick is higher. As soon as you move your hand forward the stick is right there. You don’t have to reach down. The stick on the right-hand console is the perfect place to have it on fighter aircraft. When I saw that on the F-16 back in the I was impressed. A fly-by-wire stick that is not obstructing the view of the instruments. They’re placing the control stick on the right and left consoles on newer passenger aircraft too.

[jop]

I absolutely love that you say "speculation or speculative" and don't just throw out BS talking points. Subscriber forever here

[_Hangman]

Fantastic channel, love the explanations, simple but informative, the use of visual aids is brilliant too...

The R-77/M has a much farther range than that also the Felon has multiple radars.

[googleplex]

At the minute 3:46 this actually is 101ks-o Directional infrared countermeasures. This shine lasers into heat seeker of the missiles like the stinger and aim 9x and thus blinding them giving them no guidance.

[redname]

J-20 program was based on data extracted from microsoft windows computers located in lockhead martin.

[BaSiC]

All politics aside, this is a great fighter jet. The main problem is just the production capacity. It is very limited compared to Soviet Union.

[definitelyfrank]

Excellent unbiased explanation. That's what most "explanation channels" as I like to call them, lack -- especially when talking about Russian or Chinese technology. Videos like this don't usually mention what the thought process of the engineers were when designing said entity, and why those design choices were made.

[Darkosa]

Great content, please keep making it!