Breaking the rules of math

preview_player
Показать описание
This viral post is one the most requested topics from viewers. There is a popular false proof that 2 + 2 = 5. Where is the mistake? #math #maths #mathematics #shorts

Send me suggestions by email (address at end of many videos). I may not reply but I do consider all ideas!

If you purchase through these links, I may be compensated for purchases made on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not affect the price you pay.

Book ratings are from January 2022.

My Books (worldwide links)

My Books (US links)
Mind Your Decisions: Five Book Compilation
A collection of 5 books:
"The Joy of Game Theory" rated 4.2/5 stars on 224 reviews
"The Irrationality Illusion: How To Make Smart Decisions And Overcome Bias" rated 4/5 stars on 24 reviews
"40 Paradoxes in Logic, Probability, and Game Theory" rated 4.1/5 stars on 38 reviews
"The Best Mental Math Tricks" rated 4.2/5 stars on 76 reviews
"Multiply Numbers By Drawing Lines" rated 4.3/5 stars on 30 reviews

Mind Your Puzzles: Collection Of Volumes 1 To 3
A collection of 3 books:
"Math Puzzles Volume 1" rated 4.4/5 stars on 87 reviews
"Math Puzzles Volume 2" rated 4.1/5 stars on 24 reviews
"Math Puzzles Volume 3" rated 4.2/5 stars on 22 reviews

2017 Shorty Awards Nominee. Mind Your Decisions was nominated in the STEM category (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) along with eventual winner Bill Nye; finalists Adam Savage, Dr. Sandra Lee, Simone Giertz, Tim Peake, Unbox Therapy; and other nominees Elon Musk, Gizmoslip, Hope Jahren, Life Noggin, and Nerdwriter.

My Blog

Twitter

Instagram

Merch

Patreon

Press
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

“And that is why 2+2 is not equal to 5” 😂 I love that sentence

diamondaforce
Автор

Bruh kindergarten looking hard as hell 💀

bobross
Автор

i'm imagining this guy teaching kindergarten like
"and that's why 2+2=4. got all that?"
"teacher whats a squa-"
"alright great moving on"

MrWestonO
Автор

It’s like starting with a = -b. Then squaring the equation and then taking the square root and saying that a = b.

kinshuksinghania
Автор

The basic mistake in the approach is that you simply cannot take the square root on both sides without adding the '+/-' sign.

imbisatazim
Автор

The mistake starts at the square removal.

When a² = b², it may not always imply a = b. There is another posibility that a = -b.

In this case, it should be
(4 - 9/2) = -(5 - 9/2)

homathgaming
Автор

Glad I'll never make that mistake.

SameAsAnyOtherStranger
Автор

My guy just started pulling numbers out of nowhere 💀

DividedFERGY
Автор

Give an applause to the people who understood everything

PixelCubics
Автор

A convoluted equation to hide the simple mistake of forgetting the absolute value operation.

Straigo
Автор

When you take a break from 13 hrs math to watch youtube:

malady-
Автор

Bro just explained the seven stages of mathematical greif

asafkarakus
Автор

I always expect a cleverly hidden divide by 0 in these things, this is the first time I've seen a negative hidden so well

teamcyeborg
Автор

The 150 page book Principia Mathematica devotes several pages to proving that 1=1 and it's criminally underrated

StillActuallyCharlie
Автор

“Sometimes it’s 3; sometimes it’s 5. Sometimes it’s all at once. It’s whatever the Party decides, Winston.”

Xeacons
Автор

The question they ask in 3rd grade math be like:

dylmmjs
Автор

Actually 2+2= 5 if you torture someone hard enough… this post was made by O’Brien

Ploxtifs_OldAndDeadAccountXD
Автор

"i like your funny words, magic man"

theman
Автор

Finally, one of these that isn't just using variable names to hide a division by zero!

Nulono
Автор

I know the other solution to this formula, but it also contains a forbiden action:

16-12-4=20-15-5

after takin' the common multiplier before the brackets, we get

4(4-3-1)=5(4-3-1)

now, we divide it by the brackets (that's forbiden, because we have 0 inside the brackets) and get:

4=5

If 4 can be presented as 2+2, then we have:

2+2=5.

Done, but with taking forbiden action - dividing by 0.

Without dividing by the brackets, we'd have:

4×0=5×0

that gives us:

0=0; L=R.

przemysawdata