Here's why Defence lawyers hate Section 164 CrPC.

preview_player
Показать описание
I am a Delhi based lawyer.

I post regularly on:

7 THINGS MEN SHOULD KNOW BEFORE GETTING MARRIED: STORIES OF FALSE CASES AND LEGAL BATTLES IN INDIA:

#lawyer #law #court #lawstudent
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I am a Delhi based lawyer.
You can send me your stories at



AmishLegal
Автор

Imagine waiting 10-20 years just to get justice meanwhile the culprit is roaming freely and simply enjoying the life. Still the wait doesn't guarantee any justice. In case of property disputes this waiting period can last for generations. The defendant might die, the plaintiff might die, lawyers of both parties might die, the judge might die either and trust me, it won't be a wonder if you grand child would be fighting your case with defendant's grand child for 1000 sq. ft. plot.

DaysExile
Автор

This incompetence is what make india give it's bad reputation if only people do there job really well we won't be facing this issue.

tkdevlop
Автор

Due to delays in justice the courts even dismiss many petitions without examining them properly

grapeshott
Автор

"Justice delayed is Justice Denied"

PureRythm
Автор

Indian laws need to be updated to match the era,

NavinKumar-otmh
Автор

From an Advocate brother to another - it’s COERCION and not COERTION

sidvocate
Автор

In the Karnataka PSI recruitment Scam, IPS officer and ADGP Amrith Paul has been thrown in jail, and not given an opportunity to record his statement before a magistrate Under Section 164 of Cr.Pc. (Law Student S.D Karnataka)

caarsolutions
Автор

न्याय पेसो से मिलता है । बस इतना ही pta chalta hai

Opsibgj
Автор

Surprisingly, if this logic is taken as solemn truth, then all suit, private complaint must succeed as the same was made before court under affidavit.
Time to take into english consideration of apprehension of death at the time of making statement, else in general, we all are in habit of making statement in ones favour.

sayasargam
Автор

Sir, what if the witness statement is used against the witness and he is made accused based on 164 statement?

aseemkhan
Автор

Sec 27 IEA may interpret as a contradiction to Sec 25 IEA.

utkarshsingh
Автор

These shorts inspire me to leave India

I Hate the useless judiciary system here

quahogfamily
Автор

pricy info vakil saab regards from bangalore adv.Hamsa

hamsalatha
Автор

Under 164, the word "Magistrate" refers to which magistrate? Executive magistrate or judicial magistrate???

MrSensex
Автор

My man doesn't even reply to comment in case it is held against him later

ajaypatil
Автор

Sir mere bhai ko uski wife pareshan karti hai uske bhai mre bhai ki property lena chahte hain wo divorce chahte hain day 1 se pehle dowry aur domestic violence ke case se darted the ab bache le lenge issue drate hain

gangarammemorialmotherandc
Автор

Lawmakers vakil or judge nhi chahte bharat me ki nyay mile, Indian judiciary system murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad murdabad

jatinkushwaha
Автор

Can you speak in Hindi, all can't understand ... no use 😊

kirankaur
Автор

I don't like your content anymore. maybe I'll resubscribe when I have some legal problem in my life. that may be never.

ashishbarick