SAMSUNG QN90D VS HISENSE U8N Quantum Dot Mini-Led Battle!

Today is the battle of two amazing Quantum Dot Mini-Leds! The SAMSUNG QN90D NEO QLED MINI LED VS the HISENSE U8N ULED MINI-LED. It's the legend VS the new contender! You tell me who you think wins. Thank you for watching!

The Samsung QN90D was sent to me for an extended review by Samsung .

The Hisense U8N was sent to me for an extended review by Hisense.

Special thanks to the Amazing Jennifer Gala and her second channel HDR SUPER CHANNEL for all her incredible work seen within this video.

#SamaungQN90D #HisenseU8N #besttv

[cpukiller]

Just had my 65" U8N fail after only 6 months of owning it and 9 months since manufacture. Hisense was quick to "address" the issue, but cannot give me a replacement as they are "out of stock", so waiting on a refund now.

This video has convinced me to go ahead and replace it with a QN90D -- thanks Brian!

[Coronado-nzwu]

They both look great, but I feel the processing is better on the Samsung.

[mordimeshita]

I like Hisense tv U8N is more sharpness more detail and I like the color more good job Hisense

[davidrubec]

Love the color and darker blacks of the Samsung. The hisense reminds me of how lg darkens details. The dark areas in the bubbles above the pickel are stellar

[iceman]

Nice review...and thank you.
However, it is distracting and hard to get a good side by side comparision when the TV's are not at the same height.
Please use two tables that are the same for a better comparision overview.

[MeltinSnowflakes]

After seeing this, I'm glad I pulled the trigger on the Hisense U8N 55". I know the 55" U8N has less brightness and local dimming than the 65" U8N, but they both share the same updated HI View Engine Pro processor, and for $699, I couldn't resist. Great content, really enjoy your videos.

[Goatex]

For the price difference, I’d go for the Hisense, to me, I really don’t see much difference in picture quality.

[drugemp]

Great comparison Brian. There is no doubt the Samsung looked better in practically every scene. I really noticed it in the Statue of Liberty shot at 12:56. I was actually giving great consideration to purchasing a Hisense until I watched a video made by a tv technician/repairman who took the back off a Hisense tv and pointed out how flimsy the components are. He said if you're OK with only expecting a couple of years or so out of your tv, then by all means go for the Hisense. He made a very convincing case. Unfortunately, I don't think we discuss the importance of reliability and build quality enough.

[cadefoster]

love these comparisons between bargain brands/pricing vs established leaders!

[KrunalsinhRana-bj]

Hello Brian, do this Samsung TV play HDR, HDR10 or HDR10+ video via USB (HDD or SDD) ?

[caramasta]

I see much finer detail on the Hisense. Look at the details in the trees, hair, and clouds. Samsung's colors appear oversaturated, merging some hues in the color band and resulting in a loss of detail

[stephenpatterson]

It's good to see Samsung improving their local dimming hardware and processing. I had a QN90A and the local dimming was pretty bad on it. Upgraded to an S90C and couldn't be happier. Their C and up models do a great job of allowing a wide range of flexibility between accuracy and pop whereas older models basically always forced the user to deal with some level of inaccuracy.

[skyweezynU]

Had a hisense model since 2014 not one issue

[sumit]

Samsung is definitely better but very pricey

[bumpnpowder]

That glossy screen on the U8N is only on the 75 inch ADS Pro panel. I have had the 85 inch for several weeks now and it is not glossy at all - reflection handling is spectacular and probably this TVs greatest virtue. Unfortunately upscaling is very poor on a lot of the broadcast TV content including sports (probably made more noticeable because of the 85 inch size) and the rendering of medium to lighter skin tones especially faces is often extremely poor: blotchy, blocky and waxy looking across a lot of the content. Also both SDR and HDR content frequently has a hazy overcast to it. In contradiction to all the reviews HDR is frequently not as bright as I would like in settings that retain any semblance of fidelity to creator intent. Had high hopes for the U8N but will probably be returning but in this size and price range everything is a trade-off: 85 inch QN90D on Samsung website is a screaming deal at $1, 830 but no Dolby vision; 85 inch Sony Bravia 7 reportedly has the best upscaling which I think is very important on the larger screens but seems overpriced a $2, 499 and has has a ridiculously reflective screen to boot; 85 inch TCL QM 851G has dropped to $1, 999 and and like the U8N promises a lot of bells and whistles for the price but one has to wonder if one is going to encounter similar problems seeing as most reviewers say they are very similar .

[Jay-s]

Hey Brian, the new setup is looking nice, bro! Was just checking out the 75 QN90D, stunning picture and viewing angles!
However, in our market, it's the double the price at $3400!

[charlesmyers]

Does the Samsung qn90d need professional calibration? I prefer the Samsung OS because the Hisense may be too bright, despite in this video the Samsung looks overbrightened.

[Niles-Guy]

Always enjoyed your content . Ever thought about expanding and doing gaming monitor reviews?

[marct]

The Hisense is superior in fine details, as the Samsung gets too bright and blurs the details. This is quite noticeable in the scene of the fields of grain. The Samsung is blowing out the whites in several scenes, while the Hisense doesn't do that, so you can still see some detail there.

[Zhaadum]

After watching so many videos from 3-4 reviewers and I still don't know which one to get (if one at all). Family Room TV is currently 59" Samsung Plasma PN51D550. I was considering 75" U7N / QM7 ($700-900). If great deal a possible 65" OLED, but those are right away $1k for last years model. Too many choices and wife's words in my ear that the plasma is fine. I do watch lots of sports, streamed movies and shows.