Unreal Space Objects that actually Exist - How?

Just imagine a ravioli-shaped moon, a galaxy with another one inside, a planet with foam-like density, and, finally, a huge nebula made up of dead star’s remnants. In this video, we’ve picked out the most unusual and strange objects found in the universe. We'll have a few stops along the way to see how far the universe’s imagination goes. And our first stop will be one of Saturn’s satellites.
This is unreal space objects that actually exist.

Timecode:
00:00 Intro
00:34 Pan - Saturn's moon or cosmic ravioli
02:48 What is the Sombrero galaxy hiding?
05:09 KELT-11b — giant foam planet
06:47 Reflection Witch Head Nebula
09:44 Raspberry-flavor and rum-scented dust cloud
11:25 Conclusion

#spacefacts #space #reYOUniverse

[ryv]

Our cameraman again did the dangerous job of flying past all these objects to video them for you. It deserves a "like", doesn't it?)

[TheLastStarfighter]

Thank you for covering the incredible Sombrero Galaxy, this is by far one of my favourites! Space is truly fascinating and I enjoy your videos very much 👍

[Swede__DJT]

Love This playlist!
I will put a like on every video when I wake up.

[AmarAlgadi]

man it is like telling a story to a kid your voice made me sleep like a baby.. great video

[destinkane]

The fact that we know any of this is wild to me

[ninjatek]

You do such a great job! I can’t wait to see your channel grow!

[SweetLilWren]

Did anyone know that we do not live on the Sagittarius arm of the galaxy, we are now on the Orion arm in the middle of the Milky Way 🤷

[sidviciousness]

I am continually in awe of God's power.
Our very existence is just so fleeting yet we are growing, slowly-in knowledge and hard fought human appreciation!
May our God's blessing never cease.
Amen.

[faridbenali]

How is M104 discovered in 1781 while Edwin Hubble discovered the very first galaxy ( andromeda) in 1930? So who is the one who discovered another galaxy than ours? The Frenchman or Hubble? Something just doesn't add up here folks!

[christopherwood]

There's no such thing as being any number of "times" (×) smaller.
" Twice less massive" is impossible. Sometimes grammar counts. Especially in science.

[raymantis]

Is it 451.8 times smaller....hmmm not sure ?