Whether 'Recovery Evidence' by itself is Substantive Evidence: Justice V Ramkumar

preview_player
Показать описание
Whether "Recovery Evidence" by itself is Substantive Evidence
by
Justice V. Ramkumar
Former Judge
Kerala High Court

#beyondlawclc #lawschool #highcourt #supremecourt #advocacy #evidenceact #recovery #accused
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Greatly beneficial content sir. Gratitude sir.

khirodpoudyal
Автор

Thanks My lord Ramkumar for enlighten the real concept under 27 of EV Act

vishnujaware
Автор

One of the best channels for Indian students.. We can only be so grateful to u... U re service to the fraternity is amazing.. I wish u the very best

gatul
Автор

Very nice lectures for enhancing knowledge and upliftment for new comers

abdulhakeem
Автор

Nobody can match the way in which Ramkumar Sir can explain a complex topic in such a easy way, his videos are to be treasured 😊

salmanlaw
Автор

Such a lucid and excellent explanation. Thanks to you Sir.

aviationuser
Автор

Respected sir very informative
As pertaining to my case pw1
Fabricated statment not relating to the case and section pw2 and pw3 falling under related witness also fabricated evidence without proof and not present at the scean of occurrence and mentioned wrong date and time and not at all present at the said spot and as police evidence not excepted thr pw3 accusing police vandalising the premises
And suggetion are welcome
Thank you sir

chrisreay