Papacy Debate Between a Catholic and an Orthodox

preview_player
Показать описание
#catholic #orthodox #debate #theology

Papacy Debate Between a Catholic and an Orthodox (Fr. Patrick and Erick Ybarra)

Erick’s Opening Statement 2:58
Fr. Patrick’s Opening Statement 26:45
Cross Examination 45:30

Viewer Questions
1:50:44 If Rome stands above as exemplar of the Petrine sees, how can Rome be separated for church for 1000 years?

1:53:33 For Fr. Patrick: Is authority ultimately about Synods for the EO church?

1:55:41 For Fr. Patrick: The fathers of the church say that St. Peter was set out as head so that divisions don’t happen in the church. How does this apply to your 3-4 headed Petrine ecclesiology?

1:58:54 For Erick: If the Pope is the head, why even have ecumenical councils?

2:03:00 What level of development (within the Papacy) is acceptable?

2:08:18 How can this statement be compatible with the belief that the Pope alone can speak for the Church via Ex-Cathedra decrees?

2:15:20 Question for both: Strongest argument for the other side?
___________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: Any view expressed by a host, contributor or guest is not necessarily reflective of the views of other hosts, contributors or guests.

🔴PLEASE HELP THIS CHANNEL GROW🔴

Disclaimer: Any view expressed by a host, contributor or guest is not necessarily reflective of the views of other hosts, contributors or guests.

🔴SUPPORT

🔴VISIT

🔴LISTEN

🔴READ
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Michael, your setup is looking awesome!

pintswithaquinas
Автор

*Timestamps*

Erick’s Opening Statement 2:58
Fr. Patrick’s Opening Statement 26:45
Cross Examination 45:30

Viewer Questions
1:50:44 If Rome stands above as exemplar of the Petrine sees, how can Rome be separated for church for 1000 years?

1:53:33 For Fr. Patrick: Is authority ultimately about Synods for the EO church?

1:55:41 For Fr. Patrick: The fathers of the church say that St. Peter was set out as head so that divisions don’t happen in the church. How does this apply to your 3-4 headed Petrine ecclesiology?

1:58:54 For Erick: If the Pope is the head, why even have ecumenical councils?

2:03:00 What level of development (within the Papacy) is acceptable?

2:08:18 How can this statement be compatible with the belief that the Pope alone can speak for the Church via Ex-Cathedra decrees?

2:15:20 Question for both: Strongest argument for the other side?

thenopasslook
Автор

Referring to around 1:57:08 and on... If 3-4 Petrine sees are there simply so "someone" keeps the faith, who is it? Because Moscow has essentially become another Rome, and Constantinople and Moscow are currently not in communion with one another.

jeremiahzimmerman
Автор

Excellent discussion/extended debate! Thanks!

yup
Автор

I wonder if it’s important that Jesus gave all the apostles the authority to bind and loose (Matthew 18:18), but Peter was uniquely given the keys to the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 16:19), like Eliakim was given the keys to the house of David, which was a perpetual office (Isaiah 22:22). Peter himself is a bishop just like the other apostles, so the bishops have authority over their own district, but Peter is the prime apostle who’s word is final.

killianmiller
Автор

Ortho: The Papacy, as understood by Catholics, is an inovation. Also Ortho: Constantinople is the new Rome.

princeofthekylineskyline
Автор

I just realized the intro video is of Dallas, TX - I used to work in one of those buildings

Coins
Автор

Have you read Keys over the Christian World, Michael?

stefanfouche
Автор

Erick cross Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice 2021. 🇻🇦🏅

Quoprimunitus
Автор

I think that Orthodox theology and interpretation of scripture is far more superior than that of Roman Catholicism.

Jordan-
Автор

Erick looks like a sigma male with his coat on

connorestelle
welcome to shbcf.ru