Dot Product (1 of 2: Geometric interpretation)

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Beautiful explanation of the dot product - thank you so much for your visualization of the concept and overall passion for teaching!! I finally understand this.

karunyaiyappan
Автор

We live in a time where the internet is full of videos anout mathematics to find at our discretion, and for some reason this is the one that best helped me understand the dot product of vectors. I am grateful for this video and the fact that I can search through the internet until I find the teacher that helps it make sense to me 😊

stevedoetsch
Автор

At 14:50, Eddie casually makes the quadratic formula make sense in about 10 seconds, and suddenly the thing becomes intuitive...

hanss
Автор

I've been thinking of dot product as simply the product of one vector's magnitude with the component of another vector that is in the first vector's direction. Functionally, this is what the |a||b|cos(theta) expression does. I really like this thought process, because it shows why if we tried to use the dot product with 1 dimensional vectors, it would still work just like multiplication that we're used to. In 1 dimension, all vectors are parallel, so the cosine of the angle between them will always be 1 or -1.
Unfortunately, the same reasoning doesn't quite seem to apply to cross product, so maybe I'm wrong about the relationship between vector multiplication and scalar multiplication.

It did not occur to me to think of the cosine of theta as representing how much the two vectors are "working together", as if they were both force vectors. That's a nice way to think about it.

skrdman
Автор

Please do cross product I am begging you please

kidusmulat
Автор

Now I actually know what a dot product means, this is great

Qaos
Автор

Which app you are using for this tutorials, Is that Goodnote?

MasterA
Автор

That “independent” thing is kinda sketchy, some might confuse it with linear independence.

Bazf
Автор

I see nonstandard notation here that makes me wonder whether or not this is pedagogically wise. If these students arrived next year in a physics class using the Geometric Algebra notation developed by David Hestenes et al., would they pick up the new multivector notation quickly or feel confused by the polyglot? I've never seen tilde used to denote a vector before.
Why no mention of the projection definition of the dot product?

BlueGiant
Автор

But what does Dot Product represent? And what problem does it solve?

ucLe-rtrz
Автор

Hello, I ❤ your teaching by the way, do you have a phd in math?

aslamsaja
Автор

Great video but I still don't get why they are only scalers.

SimonFearn
Автор

Are you with me Doctor Woo ?
Are you really just a shadow of the man that I once knew ?
Are you crazy..are you high ?
Or just an ordinary guy.
Have they really got to you ?
Are you with me Doctor ?

johnnytoobad
Автор

No offense but having the student speak adds zero value to the lesson

MikhailFederov
Автор

I was always taught that the dot product a•b is the component of a in the direction of b. Basically, the magnitude of the vector projection of a onto b.

WowUrFcknHxC