LIVE: MA v. Karen Read, Motions to Dismiss | Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial

preview_player
Показать описание
LIVE: MA v. Karen Read - Motion to Dismiss - Defendant Karen Read returns to court hoping to get her case dismissed after the Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial ended in a mistrial.

Read is accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, by hitting him with her car and leaving him to die in the snow. The judge declared a mistrial after a hung jury but some jurors are coming forward saying they acquitted Read of murder.

*TRIAL NOTES:*
00:30:51 Karen Read in Court
00:39:03 ON THE RECORD: Judge Beverly Cannone
00:40:07 Defense Argument - Martin Weinberg
01:16:05 Commonwealth Argument - DA Adam Lally
01:34:17 Defense Reply
01:43:22 Judge Cannone Response

Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:

FOLLOW THE CASE:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

*TRIAL NOTES:*
00:30:51 Karen Read in Court
00:39:03 ON THE RECORD: Judge Beverly Cannone
00:40:07 Defense Argument - Martin Weinberg
01:16:05 Commonwealth Argument - DA Adam Lally
01:34:17 Defense Reply
01:43:22 Judge Cannone's Response

CourtTV
Автор

The fact bev told the jury you must come to a unanimous decision on ALL counts, and not ask if they came to a unanimous decision on ANY count, shows how truly incompetent she is as a judge.

adamb
Автор

Get better microphones. The audio is too weak!

joeschermann
Автор

What an embarrassment for Massachusetts DA and Justice System

debrashawcross
Автор

If i was Paul's wife i would be worried about his obvious obsession with Karen. He stares at her constantly.
Hey Paul did you ever pay her back when she baileed you out on that DUI where a guy was seriously injured? $10, 000!

There seems to be an extremely pervasive drunk drive culture in that town!

Truth
Автор

What is the point to televise this when we can't hear the arguments? There's 50 different mics in courtroom, and they can't move ONE to where they're talking?
I understand it's for those in the court to hear but that brings me back to my question.. why bother showing it on TV when we can't hear them? Making me angry.

Sfoxey
Автор

It’s clear that Judge Bev respects Attorney Weinberg because she has let him speak without interruption and has listened intently on what he has said occasionally nodding in agreement.

IAM-AU
Автор

I like the first lawyer. He’s speaking earnestly, respectfully, and in an even tone.

debschwartz
Автор

In my humble opinion,
I believe that Judge Cannoli cares far more for her close family friends than she does for the rule of law or justice for the innocent.
In my opinion, I wholeheartedly believe that Auntie Bev would shoot herself in the foot in order to protect her friends.
That's what I think.

PJTYLER
Автор

Why is she still on the bench? What a joke.

elainet
Автор

When Karen is acquitted, I very much look forward to them hunting down the corruption and just how silent everyone blaming her will go.

Raymond-Gibb
Автор

“Form is not to be exalted over substance”. Chef’s Kiss. The bottomline is the TRUTH… anything less would be corruption or judicial misconduct

CaliforniaKim
Автор

The defense and the papers - sheesh. Stop it!! Yanetti was not going to coming up with a fake story to get Karen off. The other attorney came up with a story as an alternative as to what could have happened with the cover up and all that BS. You don't need an alternative story when you tell the truth. This is a circus. Look how Karen treats her own mother if you want to know her character. Says it all!

jane
Автор

Yeah, very EASY. SHES GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS, PUT HER BEHIND BARS ALREADY

gm-lboe
Автор

She's acting like she's a celebrity she should be behind bars

kimhelbok
Автор

She totally did it. Only thing that makes sense. Listen to her crazy voice mails. An absolute nightmare to deal with. Got drubk, mad and hit him and left. Felt bad later and knew exactly where to find him. Guilty.

by
Автор

Lally is a terrible attorney. Not only does he lie, his interpretation of the law and rules shows his incompetence. He comes off super arrogant and I think that's to hide how bad he is at lawyering.

Mr. Weinberg gave a masterclass today. This should be required viewing for all law students. Now that dude? He can lawyer.

Do the right thing, Beverly.

WatchTashi
Автор

And still regardless of how interesting this case is I have to fast forward through Lally because it’s like nails on a chalkboard listening to him. A huge jumbled joke this whole thing is 🙄 I really hope the CW comes to their senses and does not waste additional tax dollars down the drain just to spare the prosecution their blushes.

lisap
Автор

I watched the entire trial and I’m my opinion the judges instructions were the problem. Read’s attorney tried to get the instruction changed. He wanted a guilty and not guilty with each charge and she only had a not guilty at the bottom of the three charges. In my opinion the jury didn’t know they could find her not guilty of each individual charge. The not guilty was at the bottom and could only be check if she was not guilty of all three charges. That is my understanding. Wish we could see the instructing the jury received.

doreenhuston
Автор

This judge is a joke dismiss this case Karen didn’t do this. This is crazy.. free read

gidgetruiz