A Philosophical Argument for Universal Salvation

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Universal Reconciliation is the correct term.
As for the people who reject Christ in this life, they will NOT be saved from the WRATH of God...remember to be saved means saved from the WRATH of God which is coming..AND that wrath is NOT the unbelievers will be judged according to THEIR WORKS but believers will not go be condemned for their works.... Having said that, God will ultimately RECONCILE ALL to Himself and there will be no more death, pain, suffering and anything that causes one to sin. God will be ALL in ALL. Amen.

thestream
Автор

All will be saved n reconciled eventually. For God never fails.

simthiam
Автор

Your videos are exceptional! So glad you are sharing this with the world! Thank you :)

jasonegeland
Автор

Everybody who is not saved by trusting in Jesus Christ while alive goes to hell forever. There is an abundance of scripture to support this. I used to be in the faith, but now I hate God and I'm also dying, I know that I will go to hell forever when I die, and I know I have a demonic Spirit living in me because every time I hear true theology, I get very angry and it's like something lives in me that makes me angry at the thought of eternity in hell being true because whatever lives in me is taking me there with it.

Those who have faith in Jesus will inherit the Kingdom regardless of their doctrinal error because faith is what saves you, but most people will not be saved.

There are very few bible verses to support universal salvation, especially when measured against other verses that's the otherwise. I am damned, I know I'm going to hell and though it sucks there's nothing I can do about it because I don't know how to trust in God anymore. My mother went to hell, my brother will go to hell, and so will my oldest brother. None of us love God.

I have tried many times to believe that universalism is true, but after being I believer for 25 years prior to my fall from grace and turning my heart against God, I remember every scripture, and it haunts me day and night, because I know for sure it says I'm going to hell forever. I guess the bright side of it is that I will see my mom and two brothers there, and that's all I can hope for. 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Although, I'm pretty sure God will not even allow us to see our loved ones in hell, and if we do we will be in too much pain to even enjoy seeing one another.
I really wish my mom would have aborted me before she ever allowed me to be born, so that there is no chance of me going to hell forever, but there's nothing she can do now because here I am at 41 years old and going to hell any day now. I was supposed to be dead a year ago because I'm terminal, and even though I don't seek medical intervention, I'm somehow still here just to be tormented in my soul day and night.

My experience alone proves to me that God hates me, and that he has no love for me at all. Those who believe God loves everyone refuse to see in scripture that God even laughs at the wicked sometimes, that he only loves those who love him, and that he will take pleasure in torturing the wicked.

JesusIsAboveAllOtherNames
Автор

This video demonstrates the "cats lie."

bobbysmith
Автор

One part I wasn't so clear on...were you saying that universal reconciliation isn't compatible with open theism at all? Or did you mean that it can be compatible, but it can also be used to dismantle u.r. philosophically?

keithjacoby
Автор

I have an issue with your premises; none of them relate to one another and thus cannot prove or disprove one another.

God is omniscient (let's say that = O).
some people are unsavable (= ~S).
unsavable will never respond (R) to provision of grace(P) (= (~S > (~R * P)) ).
a provision of grace towards someone implies person is savable (= ((P > S)) ). [Illogical reasoning. Does not address how responding to a provision makes someone savable as is argued in the premise above. If you are to somehow add R, how can you reconcile having a premise with three positive propositions that counters the premise with two ~ propositions?]
A universal provision of grace entails that all who are included in such a provision are savable (= G)
if universal atonement is true (A), then universal salvation is true (US) (= (A > US) )
Thus you conclude:
Universal salvation is true (US)

US is not mentioned by any of your other premises. It depends on not one of your other premises being true or false. If O is found to actually be ~O, then US would be unaffected. Same with G and P-- you fail to establish a premise that relates G to P and how that would affect S and ~S. I see where you are going with your argument, but it needs a lot of fine-tuning. If you cannot connect each of your propositions to your conclusion, your argument fails to meet proper logic conditions and thus will collapse under any close analysis. There are a few issues in logic here that need some revisiting before you can prove your conclusion. I could be misunderstanding how you wanted your premises to be interpreted when it comes to specifics, but even if I was incorrect in my exact analysis, it's unreconcilable to say that US or A or G has any connection to your previous premises.

Perhaps you prove my concerns wrong in your argument. That would still require you to revisit and correct your premises. If your premises alone do not support your conclusion, your premises are insufficient. If you need to include arguments that you make later in the video to back your premise, it is actually a proposition, not a defense, and must be listed in your premises.

cuTiecaTnSINGER
Автор

Everything nonsenseical is shrodingers cat.

bobbysmith
Автор

The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.
Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.

1 Timothy 4:1-2 NIV

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.
They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths.

2 Timothy 4:3-4 NIV

DavidPaul