Jack Sarfatti - Quantum Entanglement, Non-Locality & The Nobel Prize

Dr. Jack Sarfatti provides a detailed history of quantum entanglement & non-locality, offers insights into the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, and describes how Susskind & Maldecena's ER=EPR conjecture explains UAP flight performance and Elizondo's "5 Observables".

ER = EPR is a conjecture in physics stating that two entangled particles (a so-called Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen or EPR pair) are connected by a wormhole (or Einstein–Rosen bridge) and may be a basis for unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics into a theory of everything.

Dr. Jack Sarfatti has proposed the use of gravitational metamaterials to create a low-power warp-drive based on established principles of relativity theory. His model warp-drive propulsion explains the reported flight performance of UAPs as described in the US Navy Nimitz encounters.

Jack Sarfatti has a Ph.D. in physics from the University of California, taught physics at San Diego State University, worked with David Bohm at the University of London's Birkbeck College and with Abdus Salam at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, Italy.

Jack was the basis of the memorable time-travelling Dr. Emmett Brown in the Back to the Future trilogy, and the author of Super Cosmos (2005), Destiny Matrix (2002), Space: Time And Beyond II (2002), and the coauthor with Fred Alan Wolf and Bob Toben of Space-Time and Beyond: Toward an Explanation of the Unexplainable (1982).

[JackSarfatti]

I am using the white board live drawing for several reasons. One to slow me down. I think and talk much faster than most humans maybe because my brain was supercharged in 1953 by the time-traveling conscious AI on a "Tic Tac from the future"? ;-) These are physics lectures for serious people. The content is difficult.

[UFOUAPFirstContact]

I do not understand why Tims shows arent getting thousands of views, these interviews he does are some of the best out there. I really despise YouTubes algorithms.

[TulseLuper]

Absolutely the best Jack interview, Tim congrats on this and just letting Jack riff, far and away the best interview he has given in many years.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

Professor Basil J. Hiley is working on a new paper based on the information I sent him regarding noncommutativity. Penrose also now relies on noncommutativity. So I don't think Jack is up to speed on Penrose. The Protoconsciousness enables paranormal perception according to Penrose - before the collapse of the wavefunction as typical consciousness.

[zachmorgan]

I love these interviews with Jack Sarfatti.

[Bassotronics]

Amazing. I’m bad at math but love learning about quantum mechanics and anything related to it.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

Hi Jack - if you're reading this - did you know Herbert J. Bernstein? He was my QM Prof at Hampshire College and he was at San Diego also the same time you were! 1967.

[Devesh]

Thank you Tim for hosting Dr.Sarfatti. Others think of him as senile and sarcastic person due to his eccentric nature and don’t invite him on. You’re extremely respectful and a great interviewer. Much respect and appreciation for you. Plz have Dr. Sarfatti on again, he is a good educator on this topic.

[frun]

I firmly believe, *space is a fractal*. 2:00:00 The resolving power depends on the observer, so Lp squared is a limitation for a *particular class of observers*. This is clearly seen from the hydrodynamic quantum analog point of view on qm. Say in a lattice, one can't excite sound waves smaller, than the distance, between the neighboring lattice sites.

[BarefootBill]

Hey Tim,
Thank You so much for not interrupting!
I love listening to Jack "Ramble On'.
Keep up the great work!

[carlton]

Tim you get a prize along with Dr.JackS.
These talks are infinitely valuable - your collected interviews and I'm saying here now about your Jack Sarfattis interviews- being the absolute best thing, ever.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

That was riveting! thanks. I would just add that Olivier Costa de Beauregard's big point is that the retrocausality is just in TIME and not spacetime - and therefore you can have signalling from the future. This is from Costa de Beauregard's mentor Louis de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony that de Broglie (pronounced de Broy) called his "greatest discovery." Costa de Beauregard realized this explained the paranormal and spiritual but de Broglie would not let Costa de Beauregard publish this concept. It was only after Feynman argued from the similar reverse time effects that de Broglie allowed Costa de Beauregard to go public with this concept. What's hilarious is that the Wiki page on Costa de Beauregard makes NO mention of the paranormal but if you read Costa de Beauregard's published papers most of them focus on the paranormal!! Also his book "Time: a physical magnitude" goes into the paranormal as well. And the CIA did "classify" and underline the paranormal research of Costa de Beauregard - so maybe that was Jack doing that underlining of Costa de Beauregard!! thanks again.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

"Sutherland formalized an intuitive action-reaction between waves and particles that I advocated in 1996 at the Tucson Conference (Stuart Hameroff). I got the idea from Bohm and Hiley’s book “Undivided Universe” where they mention “two way relationship” same idea Einstein used to get General Relativity in with the action of spacetime on the free fall of matter is compensated by the reaction of matter back on spacetime that is recognized as the “geometrodynamical field” with material sources. The only reason quantum entanglement is not a stand-alone keyless Command Control Communication Channel (C4) alternative to electromagnetic field signalling, is the violation the action-reaction principle. In Quantum Mechanics (QM) the waves have no sources and that is why we need a classical electromagnetic signal key to locally decrypt the message encoded in the quantum entanglement pattern that is beyond space-time. This changes in Post-Quantum-Mechanics (PQM) for room temperature non-equilibrium “superconductors” found in living matter pumped by metabolism. This was first realized by Herbert Frohlich with whom I had
contact in the 1960s and 1970s. Consciousness, telepathy, PK, precognition are all easily
understood as PQM phenomena." Jack Sarfatti

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

Actually Basil J. Hiley did expand Bohm to a relativistic model using Clifford noncommutative quantum algebra.

[edmondedwards]

it does seem as if there are two signals (mater waves) in an entangled particle situation, and that they are operating in a destructive fashion until the observer focuses on only one signal, and that has a shielding effect upon both signals, isolating them from one another's influence, ending the destructive effects, giving rise to what is called "collapse" of the wavefunction, which causes the materialization of what information is contained within both signals to become two material objects in their respective locations. The fact that they were destructive means that the resulting paticles will have opposite spins when realized as they were "out of phase'" in the original scenario.

[MarkDStrachan]

Tim, this is super interesting. You're doing a great job with these shows, and showing no fear of going deep. You remind me of Art Bell. I'm really enjoying this content.

Its really interesting to me to compare and contrast Jack's thinking with Wolfram--who was Feynman's grad student.. Wolfram has unidirectional time and GR=QM--they both follow the same geodesic math thru different coexisting mathemtatical spaces. Wolfram handles entanglement in 'branchial' space, and gravity in a spacetime graph. Branchial space is where the spacetime graph can connect via entanglement and multiple branches of the same patch of spacetime can coexist. Branchial space allows for something like many-world's style universe branching to be avoided, by creating locally limited branches of causality that you might think of like little hyperspace crystals that always merge every branch over a short range, where branching and merging balance is preserved by a mechanism called grothendieck completion--which looks to me like where a balance point of possible worlds exists - effectively allowing a form of 'free will to take place in causal resolution. There's no forcing one branch over another so pure determinism loses its grip, in that balance.

I think its far from likely either of these two guys will try to reconceive their theories of everything in light of the other's work. But I think it would be reallly interesting to see if Sarfatti's retrocausality could be formulated as closed time like curves opening up into -not ckosed- spirals thru branchial space, as seperate branch paths.

I wonder about this because Wolfram's ideas are so well formulated, and I'm wondering if Sarfatti holds the key to a deeper understanding of reality that could flourish in Wolfram's formalism. I think Wolfram's gptten so many things right and is so far ahead of everyone... but these features of retrocausality are fascinating, and its inreresting to consider history and fate in competition for causal determination... though instinct says to me that there is a third factor--the will of consciousness in the moment.

In Wolfram's universe its easy to see the progression and expansion of the universe from its first moment--that first node or singularity meeting the second with an edge or wormhole, and the process building into a web of expanding connection as the flow of flow of rule execution updates and grows the spacetime graph.

I don't know how to visualize a structure like that tied into a mirror causal stream of fate tho. My mind can't get that far...

[michaelperrone]

This may be one of the most important videos you have posted Tim. Especially once Sarfatti really gets going on the science about halfway through. Very instructive about the mathematical formalism with references to the key papers

[dutchdroomdenker]

Jack needs to go Rogan. So much history, knowledge wisdom and science here

[thomasspeer]

tim, you are doing this world a great favor

[Critter]

Mr. Sarfatti is a real character. Glad to see him.