A Quick and Easy Diophantine Equation

preview_player
Показать описание
This video is about solving an interesting Diophantine Equation
If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
#NumberTheoryProblems #DiophantineEquations

EXPLORE:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is a really underrated channel, I hope to see you blow up in the math community sometime. I've been watching your videos for a while, and only now noticed the number of subscribers after noticing that there were only 70 likes on this video. I'm telling you, you'll get at least 20k by March

TC
Автор

The substitution isn't really necessary in this problem. The given equation can be rewritten as (x + 1)(x - 1) = 2y^2. Because x is odd, 4 divides (x + 1)(x - 1), and it follows that 2 divides y. Given that y is prime, y = 2, etc.

richardryan
Автор

There is actually an infinite amount of integer solutions given by the general method of solving Pell Equations. I wonder if there are an infinite amount of infinite prime solutions as well.

infintiy_math
Автор

DO U DAILY WORK ON THIS STUFF IS INSANE FOR EVERYTHING

MelomaniacEarth
Автор

My approach:

We have x^2 - 1 = 2y^2, so x is odd (because if x is even, then x^2 is even, so x^2 - 1 is odd, a contradiction)

If we factor the left hand side we have

(x + 1)(x - 1) = 2y^2

Both (x + 1) and (x - 1) are even, so (x + 1)(x - 1) = 2y^2 is divisible by 4.

So y^2 is even, which implies that y is even.

As y is prime, y = 2. And from this we get x = 3.

Thank you for the video !! :D

joaquingutierrez
Автор

Just to get you started on the general case, where x must be odd and y must be even:
{ (1, 0), (3, 2), (17, 12), (99, 70), (577, 408) ... }
Obviously, the negative values are also solutions.

RexxSchneider
Автор

I saw the thumbnail and thought that we were meant to search for 1 unsigned integer solution. I rewrote the equation multiple times hoping to find such solution but only got these:
x^2 - 2(y^2) - 1 = 0

(xx - 1) / 2 = yy

x mod 2 = 1, therefore, xx mod 8 = 1

xx - 2yy = 1

(xx - 1)^(1/2) = 2^(1/2) * y

((xx - 1) / 2)^(1/2) = y

(xx - 1) / yy = 2
("lb" is binary log)
lb((xx - 1) / yy) = 1

lb(xx - 1) = 2 * lb(y) + 1

lb(xx - 1) = (lb(y) + 1/2) * 2

lb(xx - 1) / 2 = lb(y) + 1/2

I gave up so I used the brute force approach to find a trivial solution: x = 1, y = 0. But I wasn't satisfied so I found {3, 2} and stopped there. Then I saw the video and you said "primes" and I was like "bruh"

Rudxain
Автор

in (x, y) ordered pair the following are solutions :(3;2), (-3;2), (3;-2), (-3; -2), because the restriction are that the number must be integers, not only prime numbers.

cav
Автор

(1, 0) is also a solution. In fact, this équation have an infinity of solutions.

smailmoudoub
Автор

It is possible to reasoning starting by factoring the equation like this: (x+y)(x-y)=y^2+1. Thus (x+y)=(x-y)mod y^2 and consequently 2y=0 mod y^2. This means that 2y divides y^2, particularly 2 divides y^2. Since y is prime, it follows y=2.

danielvieira
Автор

I found out that if we consider that x and y can be any integers, than if some (x;y) is a solution, than (4y^2+1;2xy) will also be a solution. This actually shows that there are infinite integer solutions, pretty interesting

crazyhitman
Автор

best video! love it :)
very cool
i hope you get way more popular way faster

aashsyed
Автор

2y²=x²-1=(x-1)(x+1) (1)
2 divides 2y² then 2 divides (x-1)(x+1).
But that implies that 2 divides both x-1 and x+1 (since their parity is the same).
Then 4 divides 2y² then 2 divides y² then 2 divides y (for a similar reason).
Since we supposed that y is a prime number, that forces y=2 (2 is the only even prime member).
So we have: x²-8=1 and therefore x=3.

italixgaming
Автор

I thought the prime number limitation was unnecessary, but I was wrong. Eg 17^2-2×12^2=1
. Solutions of this type depend on finding triangular numbers "T" which are also square.
In this case, T=36.
y= 2×sqrt(T), 2y^2+1=289
36=(m)(m+1)/2 where m=8 and x=2m+1=17.
The given solution corresponds to T=1, m=1
Square, triangular numbers are rare. Here are the first few. 1, 36, 1225, 41616, 1413721, 48024900.

davidseed
Автор

A simpler way to solve is as follows:
x² - 2y² = 1 then (x² - 1)/2 = y²
Thus (x² - 1)/2 is a perfect squared integer, (x² - 1) is even hence x is an odd number. With these conditions then x = 3 as (3² - 1)/2 = 4 = 2² a perfect squared integer. Thus (x, y)=(3,4)

nasrullahhusnan
Автор

Fursly you can factor x*x-1 to get:
(x-1)*(x+1) = 2*y*y
If x = 2, then LHS is odd, but RHS is even.

If X > 2 - than X must be odd. Because of that, LHS whill be prodoct of 2 even numbers, and it means that LHS is divisible by 4.

But RHS can be divisible by 4 only if Y is 2. Then RHS is 8, and X is 3.

And this is all.

Ssilki_V_Profile
Автор

can you please answer me what is the solution for the other case when x^2-2y^2=-1 i found that 5 and 7 are solutions but i cant prove that it is the only solution

laifiyazid
Автор

The unity fundamental of Z[√2] is 1+√2 but (1+√2)*(1-√2)=-1. That's the Norm of 1+√2 is (-1) then "the unity fundamental" with Norm 1 is (1+√2)^2=3+2*√2.
Then the unities in Z[√2] with Norm 1 are the form +-(3+2*√2)^n with n\in Z.
But if x^2-2*y^2=1 then (x+y*√2)*(x-y*√2)=1. That is x+y*√2 is a unity of Z[√2] with Norm 1.
Then if and

Then (+-x_n, +-y_n) are solutions where n\in Z.

elkincampos
Автор

Thanks but how do you explain that 17²-2*12² = 1?? So (17;12) is another solution for the equation, isnt it ?? Maybe I made a mistake

alihachicha
Автор

(x-1)(x+1) = 2 y*y has a feasible solution for (x, y) in integral domain, for odd x only .
Writing x= 2n+1 one gets
n(n+1) = y*y .
This essentially means y*y lies in between two square numbers n^2 and (n+1)^2.
Hereby no feasible solution is there to x^2 -2*y^2 = 1 for integral (x, y)

ramaprasadghosh