Astronomers Shocked! JWST Discovers Galaxies Challenging Dark Matter Theory

Explore how the James Webb Space Telescope’s latest discoveries challenge our understanding of galaxy formation and dark matter, raising interest in alternative theories like Modified Newtonian Dynamics. This could reshape our view of the cosmos!

Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:

Follow us

Join this channel to get access to these perks:

#NSN #NASA #Astronomy#JamesWebbSpaceTelescope #DarkMatter #ModifiedNewtonianDynamics #Galaxies #Astronomy #Space #Cosmology #MOND #GalacticFormation #JWST #AlternativeGravity #Physics #CosmicMystery #SpaceExploration #Astrophysics #Universe #GalacticEvolution #WebbDiscoveries #NewScience #SpaceResearch #ScientificBreakthrough #FutureOfCosmology #NASA #SpaceNews #EarlyUniverse #QuantumPhysics #SpaceScience #JamesWebbDiscoveries #AncientGalaxies #SpaceExplorationJourney

[ndrew.Vietnam]

That’s amazing, just shows how little we know. In my opinion we should be pushing more resources into space exploration instead of everyone worrying who has the most nukes. If we all lived in peace we would be able to learn so much more

[Klaus]

I wish had the million or so years left that it’s going to take for us to figure this stuff out. It’s so fascinating.

[philipfontaine]

Someone in that distant galaxy is looking at the milky way and thinking they’re seeing a early galaxy .

[MikeJones-wpmw]

It's not gravity that behaves differently, but light in the presence of gravity. It's not how far away these things are, James Webb sees far, it's when what we are seeing took place that is in question. If they couldn't have existed as far back as we think we are looking in time, they we aren't looking that far back in time, only distance. Time is just a concept, it is an illusion based on how light interacts with gravity.

[johnhagan]

I find this stuff truly amazing and interesting

[wanted_melon]

Who would've known that beings who don't even know everything about their own planet would constantly be wrong about how the universe works

[douglasstrother]

In any discussion of Unified Theories, Gravity, Electromagnetism, and the Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces are taken as the four fundamental forces of nature; the first two are part of our everyday, *macroscopic* experiences. It's curious that Electromagnetism has been uniquely excluded from Cosmology.
It makes sense to use *all* of the tools in the toolbox.

"Magnetohydrodynamics & Plasma Physics" is discussed in Chapter 10 of Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (2nd edition). Revisiting the concepts in "Cosmical Electrodynamics" by Alfvén & Fälthammar, and "Physics of the Plasma Universe" by Peratt deserves attention, especially in light of contemporary observations from JWST and other observatories.

[johnhagan]

The still image at the 10 second mark is unbelievable showing so many galaxies and stars all crowded together is unimaginable .kno that's a AI generational or CGI image but if it's actually anywhere close to looking like that it's INSANE

[OwnedEpicStyle]

It’s a weird feeling to remember that we don’t actually understand the reality we live in

[mataius]

It has to do with how we measure and determine the size of a galaxy based on it’s luminosity. There appears to be a couple reasons the could be responsible for the luminosity of theses galaxies.

[TheDandyMann]

The fundamental force in the universe is electro-magnetism, not gravity. Gravity itself is an electromagnetic phenomenon as well described as an electric dipole. Once scientists like Maxwell, Alfven, and Thornhill are actually listened to and respected we can actually have a Renaissance in cosmology.

[jimmyjuju]

What if...and stay with me....universal constants are actually fluid and dynamic. Maybe the speed of light a billion years ago was (relatively) faster than it is now. We use "now" numbers to calculate "then" phenomena. Maybe that's a mistake.

[kevinlawson]

Maybe there’s no beginning, no middle or no ending!

[Shyborg]

Maybe we only have the physical law assumptions we have because we happen to occupy this spot in the universe. If we’d started out somewhere else, maybe our astrophysical discoveries would be different.

[FarSeeker]

I think that each scientific revolution results from a change in perspective caused by a disruption of the current understanding of how the universe works.

We have to look at things differently.

[britthoward]

Go to the beach and look at the sand swirls. Same ocean. Same gravity. Same waves. Some swirls of sand are big. Some may be small with faster velocity.
Twirl a lasso. The rope in addition to centrifugal force, is connected and pulls on itself. What part of the lasso moves further and at first blush appears faster? The outer part.
Low gravity vs high gravity has an affect on velocity, but that isn't MOND. Variation in size or speed doesn't mean gravity behaves differently.

[robertphillips]

Perhaps the Laws of Physics that we have here don't apply in every Galaxy.

[parabellumgaming]

I always assumed larger galaxies formed more quickly early on bc matter, in general was contained in a smaller space

[ditchgator]

It's just a popular galaxy where many wanted to move to.
That why they're so large😉👍👍😊🤣

[Windprinc]

Could this be similar to the Ultraviolet Catastrophe that was ultimately resolved by Planck and his idea of quantization of photons?

Maybe the current Newtonian theory and MOND represent observations that are missing that sweet spot in the “middle, ” and a theory of quantum gravity would help unite the two, without the need for dark energy and/or dark matter…

Maybe???