Consumer Law: Presented by The People's Lawyer Richard Alderman

Consumer Law: Presented by The People's Lawyer Richard Alderman

[PrudenceRitchie]

Recently I bought a 2004 Ford F150 Truck. It was "AS IS. NO WARRANTY." Doesn't the law require the seller to incorporate 30 day warranty where the seller is responsible to repair all problems found on the vehicle?

[goodguy]

Th was a very informative video for Texas residents. Richard Alderman is helping a lot of people in his community. Thank you!

[leliahood]

Thank you for sharing this information. Even though I live in Florida I found out so e great info. As a consumer as well as an ecommerce reseller this is so important.

[bonniej]

Was usually only warranty for 30 days after that you got to go to the manufacturer and they say the same thing that they're not if I didn't buy one a warranty cuz usually you have to buy one then it's only work good for like 6 months

[dealstogo]

Great lecture. I hope this law professor gives more lectures online.

[ericpham]

3 levels of consumers laws 1) government, 2) management 3) consumers as individual

[CrinManole]

Problem with the law is that if the person who sold you a car that has problems, if the person has a P.O. Box and no address, the courts will not have jurisdiction.

[keithb]

I noticed something about this. I understand the consumer laws related to this. This guy had a 750 credit score. That’s good, and a few people on YouTube done the same thing to get a car using the law with a 700 credit score. Yes he didn’t get approved at first but I believe your 700+ helped you in the long end. You didn’t walk in with a 500 or 550 credit score. I need someone who has done it with a low credit score using these laws.

[CornelConstantin-hb]

Great information..will this law apply to NC

[pbat]

Is this worldwide or just america im in the uk an cant afford to pay for my car

[Beautiful]

He got a LMAO out of me a minute in! “You gotta ask for it first”

[bodhivistaproductions]

Considering the 1933 US bankruptcy, fiat banking, de facto usurpation of the de jure Republican form or government and other Color of Law schemes of the legalese society, perhaps do a lecture on how to find true remedy aka discharge of debt whereas the only valuable consideration given is the signature of the true creditors, we, the people. Whereas all property vests in the state and whereas all debt is an obligation of the UNITED STATES, perhaps be honest and teach truth. Perhaps how one can be in the Private and handle all affairs in Equity.

[mercyvinson]

Ran across your vedio any conversation will be appreciated

[williammaldonado]

Interesting. On two occasions I received a call from India... saying the same thing! I caught it
quick! Busted!

[bonniej]

If you are sovereign can you kick them out without going to court? Massachusetts Banks can file foreclosure without the going to court.

[MrThemosthayted]

If you are coming to view this video to clear about Consumer Law and how to apply it regarding your Consumer Report…

YOU’RE WASTING YOUR TIME.

[patriotroadwarrior]

Lawful rights. Legal is maritime. Common law is law of the land

[bonniej]

One time I ended up a payment with somebody and I changed my credit card and there's a dialer or some kind of app that will update the credit card and tell them what the new number is and then they let it go through and I'm like you know that's why I changed my card so that they wouldn't use it and the chime representative told me that.

[LuxeprivaeMedia]

MARITIME JURISDICTION


Van Deurzen v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USA, 276 Wis. 2d 815 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004)


....🔑 Dicta


Maritime law is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction. In 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1), Congress gave federal district courts exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over civil cases of admiralty and maritime  jurisdiction, except that state courts retained concurrent jurisdiction to the extent that they would otherwise have provided a remedy for the suitor. Thus, unless Little Lake Butte des Morts was a navigable waterway for purposes of maritime law, this case involved no maritime tort. The trial court therefore had no concurrent maritime jurisdiction and had no authority to apply maritime substantive law to this case, even if the parties so requested.

[runfayalife]

That check might have been an old lady being scammed by people that told her she was accidentally over paid and they're going to lose their job.

There's a guy on youtube that gives those guys grief.