PROOF NOAH’S ARK ACTUALLY HAPPENED!!! 😳😱🤯#bible #noahsark #supernatural #god #christian #shorts

[CCold_Dude]

Amen thank you god and jesus amen yes 🙏

[hgkboom]

Continental drift is the hypothesis that the Earth's continents have moved over geologic time relative to each other, thus appearing to have "drifted" across the ocean bed.[1] The idea of continental drift has been subsumed into the science of plate tectonics, which studies the movement of the continents as they ride on plates of the Earth's lithosphere.[2]
The speculation that continents might have 'drifted' was first put forward by Abraham Ortelius in 1596. A pioneer of the modern view of mobilism was the Austrian geologist Otto Ampferer.[3][4] The concept was independently and more fully developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912, but at that time the hypothesis was rejected by many for lack of any motive mechanism. The English geologist Arthur Holmes later proposed mantle convection for that mechanism.
History
Further information: Timeline of the development of tectonophysics (before 1954)
Early history
See also: Early modern Netherlandish cartography and geography

Abraham Ortelius by Peter Paul Rubens, 1633
Abraham Ortelius (Ortelius 1596), [5] Theodor Christoph Lilienthal (1756), [6] Alexander von Humboldt (1801 and 1845), [6] Antonio Snider-Pellegrini (Snider-Pellegrini 1858), and others had noted earlier that the shapes of continents on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean (most notably, Africa and South America) seem to fit together.[7] W. J. Kious described Ortelius' thoughts in this way:[8]
Abraham Ortelius in his work Thesaurus Geographicus ... suggested that the Americas were "torn away from Europe and Africa ... by earthquakes and floods" and went on to say: "The vestiges of the rupture reveal themselves if someone brings forward a map of the world and considers carefully the coasts of the three [continents]."
In 1889, Alfred Russel Wallace remarked, "It was formerly a very general belief, even amongst geologists, that the great features of the earth's surface, no less than the smaller ones, were subject to continual mutations, and that during the course of known geological time the continents and great oceans had, again and again, changed places with each other."[9] He quotes Charles Lyell as saying, "Continents, therefore, although permanent for whole geological epochs, shift their positions entirely in the course of ages."[10] and claims that the first to throw doubt on this was James Dwight Dana in 1849.

Antonio Snider-Pellegrini's Illustration of the closed and opened Atlantic Ocean (1858)[11]
In his Manual of Geology (1863), Dana wrote, "The continents and oceans had their general outline or form defined in earliest time. This has been proved with regard to North America from the position and distribution of the first beds of the Lower Silurian, – those of the Potsdam epoch. The facts indicate that the continent of North America had its surface near tide-level, part above and part below it (p.196); and this will probably be proved to be the condition in Primordial time of the other continents also. And, if the outlines of the continents were marked out, it follows that the outlines of the oceans were no less so".[12] Dana was enormously influential in America—his Manual of Mineralogy is still in print in revised form—and the theory became known as the Permanence theory.[13]
This appeared to be confirmed by the exploration of the deep sea beds conducted by the Challenger expedition, 1872–1876, which showed that contrary to expectation, land debris brought down by rivers to the ocean is deposited comparatively close to the shore on what is now known as the continental shelf. This suggested that the oceans were a permanent feature of the Earth's surface, rather than them having "changed places" with the continents.[9]
Eduard Suess had proposed a supercontinent Gondwana in 1885[14] and the Tethys Ocean in 1893, [15] assuming a land-bridge between the present continents submerged in the form of a geosyncline, and John Perry had written an 1895 paper proposing that the earth's interior was fluid, and disagreeing with Lord Kelvin on the age of the earth.[16]

[JayDee-shkt]

They dispute the bible to the public so people will join them misery loves company but the leaders of the world know the bible is very real if something is not true you don't have to spend so much time disputing it

[cbdwarfer]

It is 2023, does anyone actually believe the Noah's ark story actually happened? To try to justify the story is concordant with reality is ludicrous. Take moral lessons/comfort in such allegorical tales by all means, but it is foolhardy try to insist they actually happened without evidence. No offence intended.

[HozanMzere]

Kurdistan 😠😠 turkia terorest. Kurdistan kurdistan .not turkya terorest

[Adroyo]

Boat made out of soil and rock huh? Come on man.