Check Wayland Protocol Support In 1 Easy Step!

preview_player
Показать описание
Ages back this little app called Waycheck and I was supposed to look at it back then but I honestly completely forgot but it's still a great app to use.

==========Support The Channel==========

==========Resources==========

=========Video Platforms==========

==========Social Media==========

==========Credits==========
🎨 Channel Art:
Profile Picture:

#Linux #Wayland #OpenSource #FOSS

🎵 Ending music
Track: Debris & Jonth - Game Time [NCS Release]
Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.

DISCLOSURE: Wherever possible I use referral links, which means if you click one of the links in this video or description and make a purchase I may receive a small commission or other compensation.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

these bots love Wayland a little too much

destiny_
Автор

The "Unknown" category seems to list all protocols supported by the current compositor that Waycheck doesn't know about.

TheFerdi
Автор

what I love about those wayland protocol probers is, that - due to how wayland works - these are in some form forward-compatible

serecano
Автор

Some nice ideas at the end for extending the app - I know they'd be accepted and not too difficult to implement. I helped improve the UI of this app - early versions had shading for disabled rows, no searching and no filtering!

oliverbeard
Автор

5:29 "Another thing missing is the Cosmic stuff ... I'd be very suprised if this was not added"

I just installed version 1.3.1 on Fedora and there is a Cosmic Tab!

christopherwise
Автор

From giving waycheck a run on river it does look like it lists the extra protocols supported by river. They get put under the "unknown" section. I think it makes sense that they don't list every protocol by default just because there's no central repository for all these extra one-off protocols. So to list them, they'd have to track them all down manually and then have a nightmare of trying to ensure they're all up to date.

It also looks like they've added COSMIC since you've recorded :)

thialfi
Автор

this man is living in my walls. just a while ago I found out about this same thing.

serecano
Автор

9:30 that tool already exists, it's called wlprobe, it outputs json and it is how the wayland explorer gets the compositor support

mrchnng
Автор

Brodie records these videos the same way anyone else releasing content habitually on a per-week basis does; he sits in front of his computer and _either_ makes a "Master roll" of episodes, then cuts from that and releases them periodically, _or_ makes a bunch of separate episodes which relieves the step of cutting content up.

bluephreakr
Автор

One off protocols
Those protocols specific to a certain software makes sense to be listed too. Why? Because others can implement it.

thingsiplay
Автор

It seems that Waycheck detects what WMs/DEs are installed, because there is a COSMIC tab present on my install (v1.3.1-1 arch). Edit: should have watched the rest first :D

sen
Автор

also you can make custom wayland protocol, then the list can't be perfect.
and already having wayland-info for checks supported protocols.

atbjyk
Автор

Me awaiting Action binder protocol.
(Merge request 216)

Triro
Автор

So GNOME has no GNOME specific protocol and only implements the default ones (most of them btw)? Or they just were not listed here?

softwarelivre
Автор

9:30 pretty sure that already exists, it's how wayland explorer's data is generated

fuseteam
Автор

Its nice, but what about those silly "partial supported" things for protocols?

genstian
Автор

A fragmented ecosystem where every desktop environment has a different API that apps have to support. This is sounding very "tower of Babel".

ToyKeeper
Автор

half of the comments are already bots lmfao

catdotjs
Автор

So which protocols exactly should I look for to know if I can fully migrate? Given all I do right now is work, use Discord Web, sometimes screenshot and record my screen (with audio, very important) and play Steam games, but also planning on using OBS for possibly streaming in the future. Maybe there's one or another really obscure edge case I'm forgetting right now but this is like 95% of my daily usage.

supremesonicbrazil
Автор

Question: What protocol(s) are needed for remote desktop clients to work properly? Last time I tried it, it didn't work that well since ut wouldn't properly send key presses to the machine you were logging into. E.g. if I clicked the meta key, that never got sent and instead my normal machine reacted to it. Since I like playing with VMs, this was kind of annoying.

Note: I only tried this on Pop OS 22.04, so it's very possible it works on Gnome or KDE or even on newer Pop OS. It might just have been a bit experimental at that point. Wouldn't notice because I just yse X11 for VM stuff after that. Either way, it would be good to know what protocols are needed for this.

the-answer-is-
welcome to shbcf.ru