Muslims underrepresented in most European countries

preview_player
Показать описание
A study has found that Muslims are underrepresented in most European countries with France being the country with the least representation although having the biggest population of Muslims in Europe.

#Muslim #Islam #Muslims #IslamChannel

Watch your favourite Islam Channel shows on-demand:
Stay up to date on our social media channels:

MORE FROM ISLAM CHANNEL:

► HOW TO BE MENTALLY PREPARED FOR RAMADAN | RAMADAN READY

► THE POWER OF SAYING 'SUBHANALLAH' | SMALL DEEDS MASSIVE REWARDS

► THE POWER OF DUA | RAMADAN READY

► MUSLIM COMEDIAN SAVE CHAPELLE FOUND ISLAM AT A PIZZA SHOP

► HALIMA ADEN: FIRST HIJAB-WEARING SUPERMODEL QUITS THE FASHION INDUSTRY

► ELIZABETH GILBERT TELLS OPRAH WINFREY HER 'FACE OF ISLAM'

► MUSLIM BAKER TOLD HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 'BOMBINGS'

► HIJABI COMEDIAN 'SMASHING STEREOTYPES' THROUGH STAND UP

► AWARD-WINNING MUSLIM SURGEON CREATES DISPOSABLE HIJAB

► LIAM NEESON: MAYBE ISLAM THE IS ANSWER

► 70-YEAR-OLD MUSLIM MAN BECOMES VIRAL TIKTOK SENSATION

►CANADIAN WOMAN'S UNPROVOKED ISLAMOPHOBIC RANT AT MUSLIMS

► MEET THE VIRAL MUSLIM BAKER WHO TURNS ANYTHING INTO CAKE

► MUSLIM CHEF NADIYA HUSSAIN SHOCKS MARIAH CAREY
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

i wonder if christians and atheists are represented in islamic countries?

sasukeuchihaa
Автор

This video is actually quite rubbish. It's like those feminists asking for equality everywhere even if they're simply not good enough to be in a certain position. Most of the muslim migrants in Europe are from a poor background doing jobs below the middle class level. E.g: barber shop, halal butcher, cornershops, taxi drivers, kebab shop etc. Unlike in Canada and USA there are mostly muslims from educated families with excellent degrees from some of the top universities. So ofc that's gonna be the state of muslim representation. It's nothing to do with Islamophobia and I'm a muslim myself

maazmustafa
Автор

The Qur’an identifies the ruler of Egypt as “Pharaoh” sixty-five times, but only in the story of Moses (peace be upon him). Not a single time is Egypt’s earlier king during the time of Joseph (peace be upon him), called a “Pharaoh” in the Qur’an. This differs from the Old Testament which uses the label for both of these rulers (see: Genesis 40:7, 41:15/31/46, 50:7), though it has since been established that the term “Pharaoh” was first coined during the reign of Thutmose III (d. 1436 BC), the 18th dynasty of ancient Egypt.[16] Historians have further discovered that during the era of Joseph, the 15th to 17th dynasties of Egypt were an invading force from Palestine, and hence they were called the Hyksos (literally: foreign kings). Since “Pharaoh” meant “great house” or “elite bloodline, ” and since the Hyksos were occupiers and not indigenous rulers, they were naturally ineligible for the honorific title—had it even existed.[17] Dr. Bucaille writes,

I must confess that when the Qur’an was first being conveyed to people, the ancient Egyptian language had vanished from the collective memory of humanity for over two centuries, and remained that way until the nineteenth century. Therefore, it was impossible for us to know that the king of Egypt should be called anything other than the title mentioned in the Holy Bible. The subtle word choice of the Qur’an on this matter is thought-provoking.[18]

The historical accuracy of the Qur’an is not just confirmed by recent archeological excavation; it astonished many early Jews and Christians just the same. The fact that Muhammad ﷺ could simply speak of personalities across different cultures like Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, Dhū al-Qarnayn, and others, with such detail was inexplicable. Similarly, the fact that he ﷺ could extensively illustrate scenes from the hereafter just as their earlier scriptures did was unbelievable for them, as Allah said, “Over it (Hellfire) are nineteen. And We have not made the keepers of the Hellfire but angels, and We have not made their number except as a trial for those who disbelieve (i.e., will they mock nineteen as few?), and so that those who were given the Scripture [prior] would be certain...” (74:31).

Some Jews in Madīnah conceded that Muhammad ﷺ was, in fact, a true prophet,  then resisted his message under the indefensible claim that it only applied to the Arabs. This was due to their inability to contest its divine origin, for they knew there was no access to any semblance of this history in the Arabic language whatsoever. As Allah says, “That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this” (11:49). Some of the toughest critics of the Qur’an today, like William Tisdall, confirm this: “There seems to be no satisfactory proof that an Arabic version of the New Testament existed in Muhammad’s time.”[19] In a similar vein, Pope Tawadrus II of Alexandria writes, “The first Arabic translation surfaced towards the end of the eighth Gregorian century and more than one hundred years after Islam. It was done by Bishop John of Seville in Spain. It was a partial translation that did not include the entire book, and was insufficiently circulated.”[20] As for the Torah, there is near consensus among Orientalist scholars that even incomplete translations of the Old Testament into Arabic did not exist until the 10th century.[21]

Some detractors of Islam argue that none of this history is remarkable, let alone miraculous. They claim Muhammad ﷺ either learned these accounts directly from the mouths of his contemporaries or that he plagiarized them from manuscripts of the Bible that have since been lost. The accusation of being spoon-fed by others existed during the Prophet’s ﷺ life, but it quickly disappeared, and until today most serious Qur’an critics avoid citing such a ludicrous proposition because it risks their being perceived as desperate. First of all, this would be contrary to the historically indisputable integrity of Muhammad’s character. Secondly, the suggestions that Muhammad’s ﷺ knowledge of previous prophets and nations came from a Roman blacksmith in Mecca (a layman), or from a passing midday encounter with Baḥīrah the Monk, or to a single conversation with a dying Waraqah ibn Nawfal, are simply implausible. Sensible people realize that the bulk and veracity of what the Prophet ﷺ brought could only be attained with decades of apprenticeship that would be impossible for him to hide. “Say, ‘If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you,  for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?’” (10:16). As for the second accusation, that of plagiarism from the texts of Judeo-Christian scholars, only someone with a strong confirmation bias would consider this possibility, for two major reasons:

As shown earlier, the Qur’an escapes the Bible’s minefield of historical inaccuracies unscathed. Therefore, in order for the unique Qur’anic narrative to be plagiarized from an earlier scripture, this would necessitate that the Prophet ﷺ somehow had access to the accurate version from the thousands of variant manuscripts. Moreover, this version would have existed only in 7th-century Arabia of all places, in a foreign language Muhammad ﷺ secretly learned, then vanished without a trace, never to be recovered again.

Even if this bizarre hypothetical were true, it only accounts for the source of this incredible precision and ignores the miraculous nature of the end-product. The Qur’an responds to this notion, asserting,  “And We certainly know that they say, ‘It is only a human being who teaches him [the Prophet].’ The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, and this Qur’an is [in] a clear Arabic language” (16:103

halalmode
Автор

I invite everyone for quran recitation thank you 💔💔🌷🌹

voiceofpeace
Автор

It is the way it is, we still stay positive and peacefull, i am not going to hate and i wont teach my kids to hate no mater if i live in Germany or a Muslim country

sandboxaccountz.zy.
Автор

The best way to represent ourselves even more, is to reason with others to spread awareness on Islam. And remember, quality > quantity.

😊👍

yellowbeez
Автор

Good video!! Very attractive from start to finish. However, the wisest thing that should be on every smart individuals list is to invest in different streams of income that are not dependent on the government to generate money

ben-esez
Автор

Let’s talk about Christian, Jewish and Hindu representation in Muslim-majority countries while we’re at it. Respect is a two-way street after all.

DaddyZhong.
Автор

I publish the Qur’an, so is there a fan? May God reward you with good…

thehealingpowerofthequran
Автор

All Muslims must wake up and spread the teachings of Quran.

adfned
Автор

Bro Islam is a political system it needs reform.

harrisa
Автор

We need to be represented more it's not fair pls spread the news.

tasnimbettayeb
Автор

Scientific disaster in Hindu Books:

As we have already seen under the article ‘beliefs’, the Hindus believe that the moon is the husband of all the stars. They fail to realize the reality in comparison. Here, in the Gita, we find Krishna boasting about himself, saying…

Gita 10:21 “Of Adityas, I am Vishnu, of lights I am the radiant sun, of the Maruts, I am Marici, and among the stars, I am moon.” The ancient Hindus fail to realize the fact that, the moon, no doubt appears to be very big from the earth, but, it remains just a satellite. It is much smaller than the earth also. Further, the earth itself is very small in comparison to the sun about 400 times, roughly. Then, the sun is just a mediocre star. Then, logically, saying, ‘I am moon among the stars’ is like saying, ‘I am ant among elephants!’

halalmode
Автор

Muslims need to increase their representation. That is the only way to fight against Islamophobia.

afsanakhan
Автор

Islam is not a religion, but a complete barbaric civilization. Islam has a position or rule for every aspect of life. It is a religion, culture and political system, a complete way of life. If Islam were only a religion, it would be of no concern. As an example, Buddhism is a religion, how much media and political space is concerned about Buddhism? Buddhism makes no demands on a civilization. Islam makes demands on every facet of society.
Totalitarianism is a political system of absolute power where the state has no limit to its authority and regulates most aspects of public and private life. There are no competing political parties since they would balance and limit authority. The critical element of totalitarianism is absolute power striving to rule in as many areas of life as possible.
Totalitarianism in Islamic Doctrine
Totalitarianism is found in the very name, Islam. Islam means submission, submission to the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. We see the basis for absolute power in Mohammed’s life. After he went to Medina, he became a jihadist and attacked his neighbors. When he arrived in Medina, it was half Jewish. In two years, there were no more Jews left in Medina. They were exiled, assassinated, enslaved and executed. Mohammed attacked the pagans of Arabia and the Jews. After Arabia submitted to Islam, Mohammed turned to Syria and attacked the Christians.
In the end, Political Islam will not tolerate opposition. After Mohammed died, Abu Bakr, his closest companion, became caliph. His first order was to attack and crush the Muslims who wanted to leave Islam. Everyone must submit to Islam and once a Muslim, you must remain a Muslim, or you can be punished.
The next companion of Mohammed who became caliph was Umar. His ten year rule was spent in jihad conquest of the Christian and Zoroastrian Kafirs.
Turkey used to be called Anatolia or Asia Minor and was a Christian civilization. Today Turkey is over 95% Muslim. North Africa, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon used to be Christian. Afghanistan was Buddhist; Pakistan and Malaysia used to be Hindu. Today they are more than 95% Muslim. Islam does not reach a balance point with the native civilization; it dominates and annihilates the indigenous culture over time.

This process of total civilizational domination is the Law of Islamic Saturation. The doctrine calls for jihad to never cease until the native population submits to the Sharia. As time goes on, the Sharia brings about submission to Islam. The doctrine is totalitarian, so the result is totalitarian.

Islam is the most successful totalitarian system in history. There are post-Communist societies and post-Nazi societies but, there are no post Islamic societies.

johnvican
Автор

Everybody wants to be the president of the country but nobody wants to be a president of the local council or the parent teacher association or the community center, If you expect that somebody's gonna grab your hand and walk you to the representation you are seriously mistaken, Some of us are NOT willing to give up that tradition of tribalism or nationalism, where if somebody that's from (Pakistan) is running for office every Muslim not from that country will not vote for them or support them. And you expect the non muslims to support you or to vote for you, Need to wake up you have been sleeping for way too long

myopinion
Автор

Wow to be presented in the that's not theirs

aintongmah
Автор

I want this background music as my phone ringtone. How to get?

usaidhpunk
Автор

Please try and recite once a day for huge

 

SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi, Subhan-Allahi 'l-`adheem (Glory be to Allah, and Praise, Glory be to Allah, the Supreme)


Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Two words are light on the tongue, weigh heavily in the balance, they are loved by the Most Merciful One." [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:67, Sahih Muslim, #4:2071]

islamtube
Автор

We need the Real Islam and not a Fake Islam from the Umayyads!!!

The Prophet has a Family with difficult history for the Islam!!!

The world must now what happend in kerbela, after that we can understand the Islam.

cembenk