This McDonald's Toy FILM Camera actually works...

Показать описание

redefining budget film photography

LongFurbyFam Links:

LongFurbyFam

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

the mcdonald's film camera's photos look really appealing to me for some reason, they look like they'd be included in some weirdcore/dreamcore thing

IMPofTHEGASsTATION

I love how the pictures look like old memories

themindlessconsumer

The shot of you staring straight faced into the mirror as the puddle slowly grows in size… priceless.

johnwanke

Bruh when I found out my favorite Instagram and tiktok account had a YouTube account I thought it would did a bunch of furby stuff but I was pleasantly surprised lol this is strangely educational and entertaining

Sewer.dwelling.rat.

Idk how I found this video but I'm glad I did.

HipyoTech

this was so entertaining, i checked the view count at the end expecting this vid to have like 500k views and tbh idk why it doesnt, great quality

BPro-pjer

The choice of background music was extra bonus...LOL!!

VedZed

Bro this guy deserves at least 1 million subscribers

Christopherstudiosrodriguez

the dream-like quality is great i wanna try this out!!!

SquiddoSquidHead

Heh. I remember what a "step forward" 110 was over 126 (the cameras were half the size of an Instamatic, and drug store prints were almost identical), and I (just barely) remember when 126 came out (though I wasn't yet allowed to handle my parents' 127 and 620 cameras at that time). When I started doing photography beyond point and shoot, fixed-everything cameras, you could still buy 116/616 and 122 film (bigger than 120), 127 was still everywhere, and 120/620 was still a consumer format. Polaroid film still came in (dual) rolls (packs of peel-apart film had just been introduced). It cost less than half as much to shoot black and white compared to color, with much of the difference in the cost of processing.

Film cameras and film are not at all hard to find -- but they're mostly an online industry now; unless you live in a major city (Charlotte or Seattle at a minimum) there probably isn't a local store where you can walk in and buy 120 film or "professional" 35 mm stocks (which category seems to include all Kodak, Ilford, and Fuji black and white), never mind drop it off for processing and be confident the work will be done by employees of the shop (even if at another location -- the lab in the back is well and truly gone), or that you'll get your negatives back and be able to talk to someone knowledgable about what went wrong with them.

I would like to add that Lomography Tiger, if in-date and used in a quality camera, is a very capable film, comparable to Kodak Gold 200 (it might actually *be* Gold 200). Your image quality is a combination of a plastic meniscus lens (the kind you find on a Holga, or any other toy camera since WWII -- older ones had a glass meniscus) and outdated film that's gotten a little fog from age. In fact, that Spy Kids camera is actually better than a lot of the really cheap 110 cameras from the 1980s and 1990s; as you say, some of the images are "almost" in focus (FWIW, best focus with one of those is probably between 8 and 12 feet, selected so anything past four feet is "acceptable").

SilntObsvr